📅 Original date posted:2012-10-20
📝 Original message:On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille at gmail.com> wrote:
> What do you think about these rules? If people want these rules,
> nothing would happen for now - just start try to find software that
> doesn't produce complying data. In a second step, these could be
> enabled as check similar to IsStandard() - making it hard for them to
> get into blocks, but still be accepted when they aren't standard.
> Finally, when no significant amount of non-standard transactions are
> seen anymore, we can write a BIP and start enforcing this as a network
> rule.
I strongly support heading down this path. Malleability has produced a
steady trickle of surprising outcomes. In addition to the problems we
already know about and expect there may be additional security or DOS
problems that arise from allowing these.
Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1f2…crwet
2023-06-07 12:36:42
in reply to nevent1q…4yz8
Author Public Key
npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwetSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 12:36:42Event JSON
{
"id": "0225d7f8f3e6edd56acf3d340d0a70162d998c95533ca9488b5e37b96bfcc07c",
"pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73",
"created_at": 1686134202,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"e6aa7fbaaa7e7d74d5666350a27b91ddee9c36dc79c3f6a87c5fb48a932331ef",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"cc2138ebeace11c93e70b4b56bcc2d34cb2af0986e8f26f27e7db95dd8e5c35b",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5cb21bf5d7f25a9d46879713cbd32433bbc10e40ef813a3c28fe7355f49854d6"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2012-10-20\n📝 Original message:On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Pieter Wuille \u003cpieter.wuille at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e What do you think about these rules? If people want these rules,\n\u003e nothing would happen for now - just start try to find software that\n\u003e doesn't produce complying data. In a second step, these could be\n\u003e enabled as check similar to IsStandard() - making it hard for them to\n\u003e get into blocks, but still be accepted when they aren't standard.\n\u003e Finally, when no significant amount of non-standard transactions are\n\u003e seen anymore, we can write a BIP and start enforcing this as a network\n\u003e rule.\n\nI strongly support heading down this path. Malleability has produced a\nsteady trickle of surprising outcomes. In addition to the problems we\nalready know about and expect there may be additional security or DOS\nproblems that arise from allowing these.",
"sig": "e824aed9dbbd0f222ed402980edd6f35a93ac33433ff39db2bc3cdd9240e827d59d37ad6ec0a8443e3a10ae9a19d42cf4c76f30bf05c2d67bd730f2faef6434e"
}