Appreciate the engagement and honesty. Going to mull this over.
In your opinion would this be correct:
Whirlpool > Wasabi 1.0
Wasabi 2.0 > Whirlpool
Or would it be fair to say Whirlpool prioritizes uniformity/pool size above any efficiency, cost, and speed gains. While Wasabi 2.0 protocol will take a big efficiency, cost, and speed gain for a small uniformity/pool size loss?