Women are hypergamous by nature. They want the biggest, baddest gigachad they can get, which is why they're only really interested in the top 5% with the next 15% being "alright" and the bottom 80% not even showing up on their radar. The good news is not every girl can get Brad Pitt and you just have to outdo the competition in your area, but you still have to put in the effort. They may seem cold and self-centered, but you have to understand that simply by virtue of being a female they've been inundated with male attention from their peers since the moment they hit the kindergarten playground, and they simply don't have enough damns to give for every guy that so much as flutters his eyelids at them.
So what do women want? Well there are two sides to this, which can be summed up as "alpha f###s and beta bucks", or more politely "alpha seed and beta need". In other words, they want a guy who's self-assured and capable, and exerts dominance in all that he does, yet at the same time they also want a good provider who will care for them and the kids. Which way they lean depends on things like their age/position in life or even just their menstrual cycles, but it should be noted that while they have some emotional need for the "beta" side of hypergamy once in a long-term relationship, it is only the alpha side that actually attracts them. YOU WILL NOT ATTRACT A WOMAN - I DON'T CARE HOW "DIFFERENT" SHE IS FROM OTHER GIRLS - BY BEING A "NICE GUY".
So what does that mean in practice? In short, just be a better man for your own sake, "build it and they will come" and all that, and don't be afraid to piss her off. Don't just sit there fawning over her every whim, intentionally don't take things seriously and playfully misinterpret what she says, don't always be available to be her emotional tampon whenever she wants, if married smack her on the ass, chicks love that stuff; have some basic self-respect in other words and she will respect you back for it. If you want to learn more, The Rational Male and Chateau Heartiste are goldmines, and both have book compilations of their blog posts available on Amazon if that's more your thing, and Dalrock is of particular interest for understanding wahmen in a Christian context. Speaking of which, I didn't really get into patriarchal headship but tl;dr God appointed Adam as Eve's head and there is no squaring modern "complementarian" notions of "co-equality" with everything Scripture has to say on the subject. See Stone Choir for that. stone-choir.com/on-women-scripture-and-ontology/
quotingSomeone red pill me on women
note1aru…xaw3