sebastix on Nostr: Best of Both Worlds: Thor Andre Gretland on Gutenberg (WYSIWYG content editor) and ...
Best of Both Worlds: Thor Andre Gretland on Gutenberg (WYSIWYG content editor) and Drupal's Synergy
“Drupal is a great fit for larger websites, and the open-source space can compete with the larger proprietary systems by simply being easier to use.
All complicated systems are difficult to use - because they are complex and because good UX is not an on/off parameter. It can always be improved and related to budgets, of course. But to be able to improve it with a good return on investment, you need a flexible platform. This is where Drupal shines.”
Interesting question in this interview:
“TDT [13]: With the emergence of various page builders for Drupal, could this lead to potential content interoperability or migration challenges in the future?”
My answer would be: use Nostr for the long form content for example. Seperate the content from the editor and/or CMS. For Nostr this means you just have to use an editor which supprts the Markdown format. Gutenberg has no support for Markdown formatted content (yet).
https://www.thedroptimes.com/interview/39790/best-both-worlds-thor-andre-gretland-gutenberg-and-drupals-synergy#Gutenberg #Drupal #WordPress #PHP
Published at
2024-05-05 21:44:03Event JSON
{
"id": "3cc7f8050bfb38fa729eeb21d1c099e050e178f1c20f3983f65c65ddb9a1cfe8",
"pubkey": "06639a386c9c1014217622ccbcf40908c4f1a0c33e23f8d6d68f4abf655f8f71",
"created_at": 1714938243,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"Gutenberg"
],
[
"t",
"gutenberg"
],
[
"t",
"Drupal"
],
[
"t",
"drupal"
],
[
"t",
"WordPress"
],
[
"t",
"wordpress"
],
[
"t",
"PHP"
],
[
"t",
"php"
],
[
"client",
"Nostur",
"31990:9be0be0fc079548233231614e4e1efc9f28b0db398011efeecf05fe570e5dd33:1685868693432"
]
],
"content": "Best of Both Worlds: Thor Andre Gretland on Gutenberg (WYSIWYG content editor) and Drupal's Synergy\n\n“Drupal is a great fit for larger websites, and the open-source space can compete with the larger proprietary systems by simply being easier to use. \nAll complicated systems are difficult to use - because they are complex and because good UX is not an on/off parameter. It can always be improved and related to budgets, of course. But to be able to improve it with a good return on investment, you need a flexible platform. This is where Drupal shines.”\n\nInteresting question in this interview:\n“TDT [13]: With the emergence of various page builders for Drupal, could this lead to potential content interoperability or migration challenges in the future?”\n\nMy answer would be: use Nostr for the long form content for example. Seperate the content from the editor and/or CMS. For Nostr this means you just have to use an editor which supprts the Markdown format. Gutenberg has no support for Markdown formatted content (yet).\n\nhttps://www.thedroptimes.com/interview/39790/best-both-worlds-thor-andre-gretland-gutenberg-and-drupals-synergy\n\n#Gutenberg #Drupal #WordPress #PHP",
"sig": "50ae0a4d4d7cff353ab13784a3ab10c048441f5ef66dbc158778765eba914c268daa76c11013cdb26172e4d9751290a34d5aac5413d666648b909c35f7376385"
}