š
Original date posted:2015-01-21
š Original message:On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 07:35:49PM -0500, Pieter Wuille wrote:
I read this and it's boring, now that all my objections have been met. :)
I'll try get a chance to actually test/review this in detail; in SF for
the next three weeks with some ugly deadlines and a slow laptop. :(
> Hello everyone,
>
> We've been aware of the risk of depending on OpenSSL for consensus
> rules for a while, and were trying to get rid of this as part of BIP
> 62 (malleability protection), which was however postponed due to
> unforeseen complexities. The recent evens (see the thread titled
> "OpenSSL 1.0.0p / 1.0.1k incompatible, causes blockchain rejection."
> on this mailing list) have made it clear that the problem is very
> real, however, and I would prefer to have a fundamental solution for
> it sooner rather than later.
>
> I therefore propose a softfork to make non-DER signatures illegal
> (they've been non-standard since v0.8.0). A draft BIP text can be
> found on:
>
> https://gist.github.com/sipa/5d12c343746dad376c80
>
> The document includes motivation and specification. In addition, an
> implementation (including unit tests derived from the BIP text) can be
> found on:
>
> https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/commit/bipstrictder
>
> Comments/criticisms are very welcome, but I'd prefer keeping the
> discussion here on the mailinglist (which is more accessible than on
> the gist).
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000001a5e1dc75b28e8445c6e8a5c35c76637e33a3e96d487b74c
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150121/39547316/attachment.sig>;
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2ā¦a2np2
2023-06-07 17:28:52
in reply to nevent1qā¦034h
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 17:28:52Event JSON
{
"id": "3db75dc428912097cf936f60e8c194eae3f11c085324d5e7c6c681f95f577797",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686151732,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"43498997aaf69cc28c108f60f2a0a9a1eeab544cf4e7f9ece35a133ac15cb4c1",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"049334e56e6362c3e271aed9297a108e549062734c75591ff5c59f037733216e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5cb21bf5d7f25a9d46879713cbd32433bbc10e40ef813a3c28fe7355f49854d6"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2015-01-21\nš Original message:On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 07:35:49PM -0500, Pieter Wuille wrote:\n\nI read this and it's boring, now that all my objections have been met. :)\n\nI'll try get a chance to actually test/review this in detail; in SF for\nthe next three weeks with some ugly deadlines and a slow laptop. :(\n\n\u003e Hello everyone,\n\u003e \n\u003e We've been aware of the risk of depending on OpenSSL for consensus\n\u003e rules for a while, and were trying to get rid of this as part of BIP\n\u003e 62 (malleability protection), which was however postponed due to\n\u003e unforeseen complexities. The recent evens (see the thread titled\n\u003e \"OpenSSL 1.0.0p / 1.0.1k incompatible, causes blockchain rejection.\"\n\u003e on this mailing list) have made it clear that the problem is very\n\u003e real, however, and I would prefer to have a fundamental solution for\n\u003e it sooner rather than later.\n\u003e \n\u003e I therefore propose a softfork to make non-DER signatures illegal\n\u003e (they've been non-standard since v0.8.0). A draft BIP text can be\n\u003e found on:\n\u003e \n\u003e https://gist.github.com/sipa/5d12c343746dad376c80\n\u003e \n\u003e The document includes motivation and specification. In addition, an\n\u003e implementation (including unit tests derived from the BIP text) can be\n\u003e found on:\n\u003e \n\u003e https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/commit/bipstrictder\n\u003e \n\u003e Comments/criticisms are very welcome, but I'd prefer keeping the\n\u003e discussion here on the mailinglist (which is more accessible than on\n\u003e the gist).\n\n-- \n'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n00000000000000001a5e1dc75b28e8445c6e8a5c35c76637e33a3e96d487b74c\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 650 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150121/39547316/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "7894cba6f26853cb5172fea3067d517c72601774a73c5d0f583d33167f233889471688ad026621b2ed92cc3617463f5632c3668067ddd708716766028ae6eb53"
}