pkt on Nostr: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2024-January/022308.html ...
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2024-January/022308.html
https://github.com/petertodd/bitcoin/tree/libre-relay-v26.0
tl;dr: I have a Libre Relay prototype available for testing. It does three things:
1. Removes the OP_Return limits.
2. Connects to an additional four Libre Relay nodes, to ensure transactions propagate.
2. Implements pure replace-by-fee-rate (RBFR) and full-rbf, to solve Rule #3 transaction pinning.
I'm already running it on a few mainnet and testnet nodes. The combination of #1 and #3 is interesting, because an objection to RBFR is it makes possible certain expensive DoS attacks. And #1 should piss off some people... So we'll see if the DoS attacks are serious enough that those pissed off people actually attack it. 😁
Background on RBFR: https://petertodd.org/2024/one-shot-replace-by-fee-rate
https://github.com/petertodd/bitcoin/tree/libre-relay-v26.0
tl;dr: I have a Libre Relay prototype available for testing. It does three things:
1. Removes the OP_Return limits.
2. Connects to an additional four Libre Relay nodes, to ensure transactions propagate.
2. Implements pure replace-by-fee-rate (RBFR) and full-rbf, to solve Rule #3 transaction pinning.
I'm already running it on a few mainnet and testnet nodes. The combination of #1 and #3 is interesting, because an objection to RBFR is it makes possible certain expensive DoS attacks. And #1 should piss off some people... So we'll see if the DoS attacks are serious enough that those pissed off people actually attack it. 😁
Background on RBFR: https://petertodd.org/2024/one-shot-replace-by-fee-rate