jimbocoin on Nostr: Courts tend to rule on things after the fact, not before. So the court could, say, ...
Courts tend to rule on things after the fact, not before. So the court could, say, rule that the electoral suspension was unconstitutional, but that wouldn’t stop it from having already occurred, IIUC.
Published at
2023-12-02 20:52:33Event JSON
{
"id": "bae81ad62736bd4bf5dcfa58356834df35edb8363a4a2e74fdcee6725b2a2a97",
"pubkey": "6140478c9ae12f1d0b540e7c57806649327a91b040b07f7ba3dedc357cab0da5",
"created_at": 1701546753,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"7e26ea9f721eb2afa402c5ac650f07a1e82c8cff71093d9a439dc465ae50e239"
],
[
"e",
"2f1fba8a77815960ef548ceecf9033003f40bfbcaa9a9d0402368addb12d4750"
],
[
"p",
"e7eb4e8f9cbf1e5cd26b81f73a95d065f94380e0d85842303d782fc67e59bcc9"
]
],
"content": "Courts tend to rule on things after the fact, not before. So the court could, say, rule that the electoral suspension was unconstitutional, but that wouldn’t stop it from having already occurred, IIUC.",
"sig": "bec11f8976013eec764a0ac27ddbf081342a27b1e090ce42f0a43af7d5797a68ac032545093da8988812d72600e48bd99b4ae8bbb7c02b6fdbc371ce0ce44b85"
}
