Event JSON
{
"id": "b697f65928dd493a3a9bda189e9b8d05099d14eac455be161a11a5a91a7e337f",
"pubkey": "75bf23531ae9f98c62995ba07191e488ead475975371d63d7dfd46bde1bfa895",
"created_at": 1702392518,
"kind": 9802,
"tags": [
[
"r",
"https://egodeath.capital/blog/fincen-may-be-violating-your-rights-bitcoin"
],
[
"context",
"Reporting Requirements: A Stark Overreach: The proposal's demand for banks and MSBs to report transactions involving convertible virtual currency (CVC) and legal tender digital assets (LTDA) is a stark overreach. The proposal cites the United States v. Miller, which considered bank records as outside the Fourth Amendment’s protection, FinCEN is attempting to justify its invasive practices. However, this proposal completely overlooks the significant shift in legal thinking marked by Carpenter v. United States, a case that recognized the sensitive nature of personal data. Here, the government’s desire to curb financial crimes does not, and should not, translate into unrestricted access to individual transaction data."
],
[
"title",
"Analysis of FinCEN Policy FINCEN-2023-0016: Overreach and Impact on Individual Rights — #jointheeclipse"
],
[
"alt",
"\"Reporting Requirements: A Stark Overreach: The proposal's demand for banks and MSBs to report transactions involving convertible virtual currency (CVC) and legal tender digital assets (LTDA) is a stark overreach. The proposal cites the United States v. Miller, which considered bank records as outside the Fourth Amendment’s protection, FinCEN is attempting to justify its invasive practices. However, this proposal completely overlooks the significant shift in legal thinking marked by Carpenter v. United States, a case that recognized the sensitive nature of personal data. Here, the government’s desire to curb financial crimes does not, and should not, translate into unrestricted access to individual transaction data.\"\n\nThis is a highlight created on https://highlighter.com"
]
],
"content": "Reporting Requirements: A Stark Overreach: The proposal's demand for banks and MSBs to report transactions involving convertible virtual currency (CVC) and legal tender digital assets (LTDA) is a stark overreach. The proposal cites the United States v. Miller, which considered bank records as outside the Fourth Amendment’s protection, FinCEN is attempting to justify its invasive practices. However, this proposal completely overlooks the significant shift in legal thinking marked by Carpenter v. United States, a case that recognized the sensitive nature of personal data. Here, the government’s desire to curb financial crimes does not, and should not, translate into unrestricted access to individual transaction data.",
"sig": "6a50441f2c096ce627bacdc2f741d452c1d7458647ee81a060c74eaa30fda19bcbd3afd5c1fa53c23a3d279692de186c4512285206ed4319fa7f78cd7132cf2a"
}