If ETH tx fees fees pay for stakers yield, does it mean unstaked ETH are more like credit than money? Usury built in? Also seems to incentivize taking out liquidity as opposed to lightning channels which reduce fees and add liquidity. Also where does 7% come from and relate to burn rate?
Idk but any ETH explanations leave me confused, it seems like technical obfuscation is the norm.
nico / Nico 🚨💀🚨
npub1w4…9quku
2023-01-18 12:07:23
Author Public Key
npub1w4yfhvlemcl6q3j3n9kvvcgtqreye28mkw6zwpgz7fn64sj3ph0sw9qukuPublished at
2023-01-18 12:07:23Event JSON
{
"id": "c577106a290b69cdc0cc71a543d7118fdc29f2100899cda5f146a5676daa9c5e",
"pubkey": "75489bb3f9de3fa04651996cc6610b00f24ca8fbb3b4270502f267aac2510ddf",
"created_at": 1674040043,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "If ETH tx fees fees pay for stakers yield, does it mean unstaked ETH are more like credit than money? Usury built in? Also seems to incentivize taking out liquidity as opposed to lightning channels which reduce fees and add liquidity. Also where does 7% come from and relate to burn rate?\n\nIdk but any ETH explanations leave me confused, it seems like technical obfuscation is the norm.",
"sig": "e0d9b77de735b1b16e38625b6551a5b56d75e833f319fe85e781e243c3ef21e9a8592b50adb0a31d1c4dcd87356e1041d54ed6891d3e2cbe3f64a20edd88f763"
}