📅 Original date posted:2015-06-28
📝 Original message:Your discussion is taking up a lot of room in my inbox and it doesn't
seem like either side is getting through to the other. Perhaps you could
create a document outlining all the failure modes possible due to the
current system, the current systems security assumptions and possible
solutions. Now it seems this is just a semantic debate and would
probably be better solved with you writing a BIP and having that
reviewed and critiqued.
-Andrew Lapp
On 06/28/2015 08:13 PM, Milly Bitcoin wrote:
> The concern with that is that any FAQ will be developed by the same
> small group that controls the github now so they will spin it in an
> unrealistic way. You see the problem now with the Bitcoin wiki.
> While the wiki has some valuable information, it also has a number of
> incorrect and cult-like claims about how Bitcoin works. Tim Swanson
> has made some good videos that describe some of the misinformation
> that often gets repeated on the Wiki and other places.
>
> I had suggested the info on the Wiki be reevaluated piece-by-piece and
> moved to Bitcoin.org but the developers didn't like that. Attempts to
> edit the Wiki often leads to the articles being defaced by the
> maintainers so that is a waste of time.
>
> Russ
>
>
>
> On 6/28/2015 5:00 PM, Adam Back wrote:
>> I think we need a second mailing list: bitcoin-process for people to
>> learn about bitcoin process.
>>
>> And someone to write a FAQ on it's sign up page so people interested
>> could at least discuss from a starting point of understanding how and
>> why it works the way it does!
>>
>> Adam
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
Andrew Lapp [ARCHIVE] /
npub1e5…uc2yw
2023-06-07 17:40:22
in reply to nevent1q…g5l4
Author Public Key
npub1e5chytzuvgung0mw5ct9m0z5t8u5s9pvf8rr2cd3sxqk4fvgy5zq4uc2ywPublished at
2023-06-07 17:40:22Event JSON
{
"id": "c49c36e31d52f844bae1dd2f5fd592d94e2341999f9d542e21ed9ce799440da3",
"pubkey": "cd31722c5c6239343f6ea6165dbc5459f948142c49c63561b181816aa5882504",
"created_at": 1686152422,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"3fe09b8bc3b13f27e42579b8ab63a325ab25d17e0571ce6b5f141d69b2abe4bf",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"7cd3eb6119cd368a0d75923718de152957b2e6b10f2d36f4ba40e04170c2feaa",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"1b29d94ee81e1ee0479f1db4bc4ac887407bd470a0d7060e76f8ab27fdd57e50"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-28\n📝 Original message:Your discussion is taking up a lot of room in my inbox and it doesn't \nseem like either side is getting through to the other. Perhaps you could \ncreate a document outlining all the failure modes possible due to the \ncurrent system, the current systems security assumptions and possible \nsolutions. Now it seems this is just a semantic debate and would \nprobably be better solved with you writing a BIP and having that \nreviewed and critiqued.\n\n-Andrew Lapp\n\nOn 06/28/2015 08:13 PM, Milly Bitcoin wrote:\n\u003e The concern with that is that any FAQ will be developed by the same \n\u003e small group that controls the github now so they will spin it in an \n\u003e unrealistic way. You see the problem now with the Bitcoin wiki. \n\u003e While the wiki has some valuable information, it also has a number of \n\u003e incorrect and cult-like claims about how Bitcoin works. Tim Swanson \n\u003e has made some good videos that describe some of the misinformation \n\u003e that often gets repeated on the Wiki and other places.\n\u003e\n\u003e I had suggested the info on the Wiki be reevaluated piece-by-piece and \n\u003e moved to Bitcoin.org but the developers didn't like that. Attempts to \n\u003e edit the Wiki often leads to the articles being defaced by the \n\u003e maintainers so that is a waste of time.\n\u003e\n\u003e Russ\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e On 6/28/2015 5:00 PM, Adam Back wrote:\n\u003e\u003e I think we need a second mailing list: bitcoin-process for people to\n\u003e\u003e learn about bitcoin process.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e And someone to write a FAQ on it's sign up page so people interested\n\u003e\u003e could at least discuss from a starting point of understanding how and\n\u003e\u003e why it works the way it does!\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Adam\n\u003e\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev",
"sig": "f94c0387f22cb4a7d96f75dad4fa1857a2d37e6c5cae01a601ff83b91051740241f10607c3449ec01b439c26f513a1b6fb90a25b61ee8195c919b53fb336ccce"
}