📅 Original date posted:2014-10-13
📝 Original message:FYI:
This is an issue I filed related to adding secp256k1 into Web Crypto API
which will be implemented natively in (some) web browsers.
If there is any feedback from crypto implementers, please feel free to add
comments to this thread:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24444
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <bugzilla at jessica.w3.org>
Date: 13 October 2014 09:18
Subject: [Bug 24444] Named Curve Registry (adding secp256k1)
To: melvincarvalho at gmail.com
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24444
Myron Davis <myrond at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
CC| |myrond at gmail.com
Resolution|NEEDSINFO |---
--- Comment #2 from Myron Davis <myrond at gmail.com> ---
Could this be looked at again?
Last response was waiting for feedback from crypto implementors.
Currently secp256k1 is supported in the following SSL/TLS libraries now
Botan
NSS
openssl
LibreSSL
PolarSSL
JSSE
The three other curves are all all have parameters which do not define how
they
were generated. secp256k1 curve has some great advantages in faster
signature
verification and how the values were determined for the curve. (i.e. not
random).
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4492
The curve has had a lot of eyes on it with lots of hardware and software
supporting this curve.
With discovery of backdoor's in NIST's random number generator
(https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/11/the_strange_sto.html ) I
would
like to see a determined parameter curve instead of a "random" curve option.
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You reported the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20141013/92a06c56/attachment.html>;
Melvin Carvalho [ARCHIVE] /
npub1uv…saxrt
2023-06-07 17:26:25
in reply to nevent1q…a43x
Author Public Key
npub1uvtfvcegcn9kds68r8he57emc480vqtx8t22kpsctxgjxae44gvsksaxrtPublished at
2023-06-07 17:26:25Event JSON
{
"id": "c486913292e2d94170d7294b9a36f3db48942a20fe95c1a96a153d7938ab627c",
"pubkey": "e316966328c4cb66c34719ef9a7b3bc54ef601663ad4ab06185991237735aa19",
"created_at": 1686151585,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6119596955585a89c0782840d3098b04d8ae1d7f2916897239a6ef3b6a641de9",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-10-13\n📝 Original message:FYI:\n\nThis is an issue I filed related to adding secp256k1 into Web Crypto API\nwhich will be implemented natively in (some) web browsers.\n\nIf there is any feedback from crypto implementers, please feel free to add\ncomments to this thread:\nhttps://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24444\n\n---------- Forwarded message ----------\nFrom: \u003cbugzilla at jessica.w3.org\u003e\nDate: 13 October 2014 09:18\nSubject: [Bug 24444] Named Curve Registry (adding secp256k1)\nTo: melvincarvalho at gmail.com\n\n\nhttps://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24444\n\nMyron Davis \u003cmyrond at gmail.com\u003e changed:\n\n What |Removed |Added\n----------------------------------------------------------------------------\n Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED\n CC| |myrond at gmail.com\n Resolution|NEEDSINFO |---\n\n--- Comment #2 from Myron Davis \u003cmyrond at gmail.com\u003e ---\nCould this be looked at again?\n\nLast response was waiting for feedback from crypto implementors.\n\nCurrently secp256k1 is supported in the following SSL/TLS libraries now\nBotan\nNSS\nopenssl\nLibreSSL\nPolarSSL\nJSSE\n\nThe three other curves are all all have parameters which do not define how\nthey\nwere generated. secp256k1 curve has some great advantages in faster\nsignature\nverification and how the values were determined for the curve. (i.e. not\nrandom).\n\nhttp://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4492\n\nThe curve has had a lot of eyes on it with lots of hardware and software\nsupporting this curve.\n\nWith discovery of backdoor's in NIST's random number generator\n(https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/11/the_strange_sto.html ) I\nwould\nlike to see a determined parameter curve instead of a \"random\" curve option.\n\nThanks\n\n--\nYou are receiving this mail because:\nYou reported the bug.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20141013/92a06c56/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "b8e2f7f6af155af4c9d29b680edd840a53794ef260114987cc79b3e7cce892eae0d299756e92533bca258be9a3b0d4da26f1c5a6fb9a325f38863b8528b884f0"
}