📅 Original date posted:2017-04-18
📝 Original message:Probably a bad idea for various reasons, but tagging (fee paying)
transactions with info about the capabilities of the node that created
it might be interesting? Might be useful to gauge economic support for
certain upgrades, especially if excluding long transaction chains,
etc. In the very least it would be a far better indicator than simply
counting reachable nodes.
On 17 April 2017 at 17:50, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> If users added a signal to OP_RETURN, might it be possible to tag all
> validated input addresses with that signal.
>
> Then a node can activate a new feature after the percentage of tagged input
> addresses reaches a certain level within a certain period of time?
>
> This could be used in addition to a flag day to trigger activation of a
> feature with some reassurance of user uptake.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
Marcel Jamin [ARCHIVE] /
npub14j…vk3rk
2023-06-07 20:00:28
in reply to nevent1q…nq9k
Author Public Key
npub14jegtpz2t9nfnefqqr0q4te9353e4k4x5y2528qf235ruluzsaes8vk3rkPublished at
2023-06-07 20:00:28Event JSON
{
"id": "c1d7d2013a0a0873af9bb936c68d87d7823b22eb22f6513815ad29fa7e7ec030",
"pubkey": "acb285844a596699e52000de0aaf258d239adaa6a115451c0954683e7f828773",
"created_at": 1686160828,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ef46a65e3ef5574153e8097f2411a07416ea21c28af0fbbb6a8c467d9c987588",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"b822c9047530e2b91597e36b94711baa700f9f74e951069d06b093ddab83306f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"22944ce1e29904e3826d25013a614e4665693ec514003efacc1b7586e8e5d0aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-04-18\n📝 Original message:Probably a bad idea for various reasons, but tagging (fee paying)\ntransactions with info about the capabilities of the node that created\nit might be interesting? Might be useful to gauge economic support for\ncertain upgrades, especially if excluding long transaction chains,\netc. In the very least it would be a far better indicator than simply\ncounting reachable nodes.\n\nOn 17 April 2017 at 17:50, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e If users added a signal to OP_RETURN, might it be possible to tag all\n\u003e validated input addresses with that signal.\n\u003e\n\u003e Then a node can activate a new feature after the percentage of tagged input\n\u003e addresses reaches a certain level within a certain period of time?\n\u003e\n\u003e This could be used in addition to a flag day to trigger activation of a\n\u003e feature with some reassurance of user uptake.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e",
"sig": "78cf01b998ffd8a2216fea7391d5d3162cfac37971d659bc3e8c3a259da9bee9156bda15994f7c4bac83d78fca36f650149b83f4133d7414e37e86d9865829af"
}