📅 Original date posted:2014-05-02
📝 Original message:On Saturday, May 03, 2014 12:54:37 AM Ben Davenport wrote:
> My only addition is that I think we should all stop trying to attach SI
> prefixes to the currency unit. Name me another world currency that uses SI
> prefixes. No one quotes amounts as 63 k$ or 3 M$. The accepted standard at
> least in the US is <currency-symbol><amount><modifier>, i.e. $63k or $3M.
> That may not be accepted form everywhere, but in any case it's an informal
> format, not a formal one. The important point is there should be one base
> unit that is not modified with SI prefixes. And I think the arguments are
> strong for that unit being = 100 satoshi.
Huh? Your examples demonstrate the *opposite* of your point. 'k' and 'M' *are*
the SI prefixes. People *do* use 63k USD, $63k, and $3M. I'll be the first one
to admit SI is terrible, but I don't understand your argument here.
Luke
P.S. Note that SI units haven't actually ever been adopted, except by force of
law. "Name me ... that uses SI" is a silly thing to say, since virtually all
naturally-or-freely-adopted units of any measure have been based on a number
that factor to twos and threes (not fives, like decimal).
Luke Dashjr [ARCHIVE] /
npub1tf…rfq0n
2023-06-07 17:20:48
in reply to nevent1q…q79p
Author Public Key
npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0nPublished at
2023-06-07 17:20:48Event JSON
{
"id": "c5efe6ed392e48874ae0acec82e2beecccd9704d952dfc0c82ae43ceca6e99ea",
"pubkey": "5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803",
"created_at": 1686151248,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"8ba52f6cbd24b10aa5afc5a25b560c6e8e647707fdd12e939394a1e8c97861d5",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"327507769d3e141219efe4dac950b3619886741527ec53a8850bc036770c623f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"0eb969cf7bf3ad3620b8051c0827dcf8603689ba12f40779fe2516fa2782625b"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-05-02\n📝 Original message:On Saturday, May 03, 2014 12:54:37 AM Ben Davenport wrote:\n\u003e My only addition is that I think we should all stop trying to attach SI\n\u003e prefixes to the currency unit. Name me another world currency that uses SI\n\u003e prefixes. No one quotes amounts as 63 k$ or 3 M$. The accepted standard at\n\u003e least in the US is \u003ccurrency-symbol\u003e\u003camount\u003e\u003cmodifier\u003e, i.e. $63k or $3M.\n\u003e That may not be accepted form everywhere, but in any case it's an informal\n\u003e format, not a formal one. The important point is there should be one base\n\u003e unit that is not modified with SI prefixes. And I think the arguments are\n\u003e strong for that unit being = 100 satoshi.\n\nHuh? Your examples demonstrate the *opposite* of your point. 'k' and 'M' *are* \nthe SI prefixes. People *do* use 63k USD, $63k, and $3M. I'll be the first one \nto admit SI is terrible, but I don't understand your argument here.\n\nLuke\n\nP.S. Note that SI units haven't actually ever been adopted, except by force of \nlaw. \"Name me ... that uses SI\" is a silly thing to say, since virtually all \nnaturally-or-freely-adopted units of any measure have been based on a number \nthat factor to twos and threes (not fives, like decimal).",
"sig": "5946552825787b8c484bb21d450899415bc22bcb500fc7f355af37b4855dd7b2be8c7c1944b3d20cc89853fa07e46ffff4a79ca5655dc0172fbc16e074048384"
}