Not on ossify camp but Saylor has a point. We need to treat Bitcoin like updating a plane mid flight or a running nuclear power plant software. We need to be 100% sure there are no unintended sideffects.
It will be harder and harder to change Bitcoin and that's the way it should be and we knew it years ago. Devs/scientists naturally want to have more features to built great stuff but it can't be that we risk to destroy or impair Bitcoin.
On the other hand I want Bitcoin to scale and as many people as possible need to be able to self custody Bitcoin (at least at layer 2). But as said, there is no way we risk another bug that gets exploited slipping in. It's hard to accept but we can't risk the whole network.
ndeet
npub1qm…g74md
2024-05-27 11:28:33
Author Public Key
npub1qm72nur0wn8cdgt0unp0amzssuqxg03tzpd4r87e856nxtz344fs6g74mdPublished at
2024-05-27 11:28:33Event JSON
{
"id": "ea91febb5506054d0f3f33aa9cab7e2d15f5f4154e4ec3d9bfb094788588bbfb",
"pubkey": "06fca9f06f74cf86a16fe4c2feec508700643e2b105b519fd93d35332c51ad53",
"created_at": 1716802113,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "Not on ossify camp but Saylor has a point. We need to treat Bitcoin like updating a plane mid flight or a running nuclear power plant software. We need to be 100% sure there are no unintended sideffects.\n\nIt will be harder and harder to change Bitcoin and that's the way it should be and we knew it years ago. Devs/scientists naturally want to have more features to built great stuff but it can't be that we risk to destroy or impair Bitcoin.\n\nOn the other hand I want Bitcoin to scale and as many people as possible need to be able to self custody Bitcoin (at least at layer 2). But as said, there is no way we risk another bug that gets exploited slipping in. It's hard to accept but we can't risk the whole network.\n",
"sig": "787d2769e58661ca90ca66e62a28560ad06350d1b83d427dcba1cfe739384ef9b0822581a241aba56920b06d273966c2dbc9c7724bb367e7c5e206509a306ddc"
}