1. You’ll get it eventually.
2. You’re not a significant threat to Bitcoin’s monetary dominance or protocol integrity.
3. Bitcoin’s “privacy problem” is largely overblown and already has numerous remedies, with more on the way…perhaps in part due to your nagging.
How do you expect the State (or any malicious actor) to not only conduct surveillance, but taxation operations based upon that surveillance, if the State can no longer use explicit or implicit taxation to further fund its surveillance and taxation efforts? Bitcoin fixes its own privacy issues through the integrity of its property rights.
Surveil all you want, how are you going to pay for it?
quoting note1fg5…ams0No reservation demand, no monetary premium
No monetary premium, no liquidity
No liquidity, no privacy
NGU=FGU