Dan Goodman on Nostr: What if the reason that publishers are unwilling to make review processes public is ...
What if the reason that publishers are unwilling to make review processes public is that if we knew what the average peer review process looked like, we might not think it was such a sacred and essential part of science?
Published at
2024-03-25 17:30:10Event JSON
{
"id": "e6d0fcf1cda6ed873d1d9c58db2181c403148c909d447fb19f4d79dd001754be",
"pubkey": "0ecc4e999a6ece69b4a5c1de90118b96e1b0e8e863d5a5b489810557bdeb5d9f",
"created_at": 1711384210,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://neuromatch.social/users/neuralreckoning/statuses/112157275636087778",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "What if the reason that publishers are unwilling to make review processes public is that if we knew what the average peer review process looked like, we might not think it was such a sacred and essential part of science?",
"sig": "39d08774d2e2199bd5935f438a9fba83fef015bef565ec0d9d9503be27b2b7368c42a8b8d970209fcab96037782d6a55782ba8db7cee519a17bf4b0c83989132"
}