š
Original date posted:2015-12-30
š Original message:This is an interesting approach but I don't see how this is a soft
fork. (Just because something is not a hard fork, doesn't make it a
soft fork by definition)
Softforks don't require any nodes to upgrade. [1]
Nonetheless, as I understand your approach, it requires nodes to
upgrade. Otherwise they are missing all transactions but the coinbase
transactions. Thus, they cannot update their utxoset and are easily
susceptible to double spends...
Am I missing something obvious?
-- Marco
[1] https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Softfork#Implications
Marco Falke [ARCHIVE] /
npub1qsā¦9jjz5
2023-06-07 19:47:23
in reply to nevent1qā¦2nth
Author Public Key
npub1qspcss06rhl7lwrhzrnv5k7w7er32htkgds2d50802eguajx4p5sp9jjz5Published at
2023-06-07 19:47:23Event JSON
{
"id": "e4803411fd806cb88758a90b04acd72f72d35e7c4e322c37a66bf05a8b3a7a18",
"pubkey": "04038841fa1dffefb87710e6ca5bcef647155d764360a6d1e77ab28e7646a869",
"created_at": 1686160043,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"410a15ecaf9eb209e9831774c35dbf549a77975bb49e6a60c2dbf869774cfd1f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"af261d7f37fe9ad9cc00dbc7b7f0b27dd5d5f4117609349d809e12ea7ff3caa0",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"43b7b510fe55636e529592954f52b81d7edf0b64a73b26d83b434b89b3b927b1"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2015-12-30\nš Original message:This is an interesting approach but I don't see how this is a soft\nfork. (Just because something is not a hard fork, doesn't make it a\nsoft fork by definition)\nSoftforks don't require any nodes to upgrade. [1]\nNonetheless, as I understand your approach, it requires nodes to\nupgrade. Otherwise they are missing all transactions but the coinbase\ntransactions. Thus, they cannot update their utxoset and are easily\nsusceptible to double spends...\n\nAm I missing something obvious?\n\n-- Marco\n\n\n[1] https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Softfork#Implications",
"sig": "52dce30a3bedfcf6a055029fde81471fba062d0a79d9692b72a35eafc0069bcf6e8719da41504eb6fc891c3a7651a860b664cd54a2aa402ce1b0a0c822ee8dfe"
}