đź“… Original date posted:2015-07-25
đź“ť Original message:The answer to that is a less illegal than probing other peoples web servers. Up until recently the reverse name lookup for that IP address was markets.blockchain.info, which I resolve when I log incoming connections in an attempt to filter out some abusive clients coming from university connections.
Other people have noticed these abusive clients too. There’s mentions of other connections running the same version of BitcoinJ coming from sources that appear to be blockchain.info which display similar behavior. A user in #bitcoin-dev was complaining about this client hammering closed ports with connections when they are kicked off.
http://bitcoinstats.com/irc/bitcoin-dev/logs/2015/02/09#l1423513396.0
Â
Â
> Sent:Â Saturday, July 25, 2015 at 4:23 AM
> From:Â "Dave Scotese via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
> To:Â bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> Subject:Â Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Roadmap 2015, or "If We Do Nothing" Analysis
> When I looked up that IP address, the Whois info names "OVH" and "Octave Klaba" (who founded OVH, according to Wikipedia) as the owner. "blockchain.info[http://blockchain.info]" appears in the HTML header as retrieved by the "Anti-Hacker Alliance" (http://anti-hacker-alliance.com/index.php?details=37.187.136.15[http://anti-hacker-alliance.com/index.php?details=37.187.136.15]). Blockchain.info itself returns IP addresses managed by CloudFlare whenever I try it.
Slurms MacKenzie [ARCHIVE] /
npub168…hhm7q
2023-06-07 17:43:36
in reply to nevent1q…dpl6
Author Public Key
npub168j7xscxgv5tup3uxm0tpkktvc9ctzwuhj5szyhec3y4qwmrawaq9hhm7qPublished at
2023-06-07 17:43:36Event JSON
{
"id": "e832fe5659833060c9f20578c50bd52a28540c152f064c0b38624d75de107d42",
"pubkey": "d1e5e343064328be063c36deb0dacb660b8589dcbca90112f9c449503b63ebba",
"created_at": 1686152616,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"fad7a9dfe8ad03505fa882cfc142cd53cfb83fa310033743eaad5169b0befe94",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"99c4e4a97425cec9ea9c20f7d6d800051dff9aa2aed76001c9bc973dc446ab5c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a384795310cea1937dda4d01ee8f14ca734b9a7ab60c62114a5656706e15e47f"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-07-25\n📝 Original message:The answer to that is a less illegal than probing other peoples web servers. Up until recently the reverse name lookup for that IP address was markets.blockchain.info, which I resolve when I log incoming connections in an attempt to filter out some abusive clients coming from university connections. \n\nOther people have noticed these abusive clients too. There’s mentions of other connections running the same version of BitcoinJ coming from sources that appear to be blockchain.info which display similar behavior. A user in #bitcoin-dev was complaining about this client hammering closed ports with connections when they are kicked off. \n\nhttp://bitcoinstats.com/irc/bitcoin-dev/logs/2015/02/09#l1423513396.0\n \n \n\u003e Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2015 at 4:23 AM\n\u003e From: \"Dave Scotese via bitcoin-dev\" \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e\n\u003e To: bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Roadmap 2015, or \"If We Do Nothing\" Analysis\n\n\u003e When I looked up that IP address, the Whois info names \"OVH\" and \"Octave Klaba\" (who founded OVH, according to Wikipedia) as the owner. \"blockchain.info[http://blockchain.info]\" appears in the HTML header as retrieved by the \"Anti-Hacker Alliance\" (http://anti-hacker-alliance.com/index.php?details=37.187.136.15[http://anti-hacker-alliance.com/index.php?details=37.187.136.15]). Blockchain.info itself returns IP addresses managed by CloudFlare whenever I try it.",
"sig": "cd511e6532655c952adfcc1bf177f7a2a9e3230cfd8a63f6af497a396ada9fca9d4ee6bd7a78ffd9579a1c79f758ba8d29d51f0ce7f138ea7ec04374be5f005c"
}