Our fiat money system intensifies wars. It is possible that our monetary system will decide in which of the two visions of the future we are more likely to find ourselves.
A thread about it 🧵
1/6 - Wars cost vast amounts of money, which can easily be generated in our current system, through the expansion of the money supply and the accompanying devaluation of money.
Easily generated war funding is bad!
2/6 - The amount of Bitcoin is verifiably limited and this can also never be changed by individual entities. Thus, an expansion of the money supply for the financing of war is excluded and capital is restricted.
No money supply expansion -> enormously less capital!
3/6 - Bitcoin can also protect against bank deposits being frozen because, for example, they have been forwarded to the government for warfare.
Do self-custody and receive a protection against expropriation!
4/6 - Warfare could also change with Bitcoin, as there would be less capital available for wars and also less capital captured through wars of aggression.
Less physical capital in the country -> less war robbery -> less profit from a successful war
5/6 - The future ranking of countries could even, according to Jason Lowery's assumption in #Softwar, change from a kinetic war to an energetic proxy war, which could be largely peaceful.
An energy currency can stop war
- Henry Ford (1921)
6/6 - Be a part of the peaceful revolution of money with far reaching and bigger implications than we can imagine.
#Bitcoin make war unaffordable, but fortunately Bitcoin is affordable at Relai 🇨🇭 (npub1sqz…vk7v) 🥳