š
Original date posted:2013-10-26
š Original message:On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> wrote:
> ....
This would give us an fully supported option which is completely CA
> free... it would only work for tor sites, but the people concerned
> about CA trechery are likely to want to use tor in any case.
>
> Thoughts?
>
I think a tiny number of people would use it, so from a purely engineering
priority perspective my initial reaction is "not worth it."
However, as a demonstration of the flexibility of the payment protocol and
because it is a really nifty idea that will give lots of people warm
fuzzies I think you should do it and we should pull it.
--
--
Gavin Andresen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131026/b0e325e7/attachment.html>;
Gavin Andresen [ARCHIVE] /
npub1s4ā¦d44kw
2023-06-07 17:08:18
in reply to nevent1qā¦5jyc
Author Public Key
npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kwPublished at
2023-06-07 17:08:18Event JSON
{
"id": "673a81974d68da7cfeddc46aa51cb0da4ae96d9460d5bde134d15da55ca6f0e5",
"pubkey": "857f2f78dc1639e711f5ea703a9fc978e22ebd279abdea1861b7daa833512ee4",
"created_at": 1686150498,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"742033471721f40b6d43cf4cd64612772c20a2675cdda10846c302155fc1bb24",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"29581259719892ad1b4659c6293b617a5bce7d2cc776c3f97f3dcaa827e69e6f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2013-10-26\nš Original message:On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Gregory Maxwell \u003cgmaxwell at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e ....\n\nThis would give us an fully supported option which is completely CA\n\u003e free... it would only work for tor sites, but the people concerned\n\u003e about CA trechery are likely to want to use tor in any case.\n\u003e\n\u003e Thoughts?\n\u003e\n\nI think a tiny number of people would use it, so from a purely engineering\npriority perspective my initial reaction is \"not worth it.\"\n\nHowever, as a demonstration of the flexibility of the payment protocol and\nbecause it is a really nifty idea that will give lots of people warm\nfuzzies I think you should do it and we should pull it.\n\n-- \n--\nGavin Andresen\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131026/b0e325e7/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "3930fbbe29125846140fa252d3de1b19c7337dbb2a1b7b1d1848a79310c24919e372ef5ffed590a3b0a98ee29cd7abfd73f4cf1a32dd4cc8181bf12fee394df5"
}