Should the Lightning Address spec follow NIP05 in accepting “_” as a default username?
I don’t dislike the idea myself. So wallets could eventually handle paying to [email protected] but also pay to @domain.com which behind the scenes defaults to the username “_”
Thoughts?🤘
https://github.com/andrerfneves/lightning-address/issues/28#issuecomment-1372324037
andre
npub1rv…kxrck
2023-01-08 20:03:12
Author Public Key
npub1rvg76s0gz535txd9ypg2dfqv0x7a80ar6e096j3v343xdxyrt4ksmkxrckPublished at
2023-01-08 20:03:12Event JSON
{
"id": "48f16787839e41d04699ca8351bbfe6c6a3c348ea15fce8575de2449e938a951",
"pubkey": "1b11ed41e815234599a52050a6a40c79bdd3bfa3d65e5d4a2c8d626698835d6d",
"created_at": 1673204592,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "Should the Lightning Address spec follow NIP05 in accepting “_” as a default username?\n\nI don’t dislike the idea myself. So wallets could eventually handle paying to [email protected] but also pay to @domain.com which behind the scenes defaults to the username “_”\n\nThoughts?🤘\n\nhttps://github.com/andrerfneves/lightning-address/issues/28#issuecomment-1372324037",
"sig": "e64d6b61596d3450f271bfbe51d3c65e5eb769f4be1a68c93f2c013f82b553e530c73b7a4f09cd3e19186359458d05a83f2a15c969d08742fc81f7903fbc1983"
}