I see we just aren't getting anywhere because we don't trust each other's sources. Fine. How about we trust the commercial viability of an entire pair of flights that fly right over the south pole daily, each way, and has been doing so for decades?
Qantas QF 64 & it's return are daily flights that couldn't possibly be commerically viable if they flew over a flat earth. No matter if you beleive that the south pole is a perimeter wall or not, with no globe the huge distance between Sydney & Johannesburg would require more fuel than you could fill up the entire inside of the plane with!
Have any flat earthers explained (credibly) how the hundreds of people each day that take that flight were not really going over antartica like they thought they were, and didn't really arrive just a few hours (instead of days) like their tickets said they did?
For that matter, a flat earth would have flights over the north pole, like JL41 from Tokyo to London, go a lot faster than the curved path that they say they take. What are those flights doing up there for so long? Circling iceburgs to fool us all about the nature of the planet instead of commercially competing against rival flights?
LukeParker / luke
npub12u4…8pyh
2024-06-26 04:04:34
in reply to nevent1q…qw65
Author Public Key
npub12u423pq5c6c5gvyzlekk5u9s5ksnyd27yemuvu3l9gpqpcnx545s6f8pyhSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2024-06-26 04:04:34Event JSON
{
"id": "4ebd0a459b54182d9093366568658096f4615f50a70e9043a1817119354d93b8",
"pubkey": "572aa88414c6b1443082fe6d6a70b0a5a132355e2677c6723f2a0200e266a569",
"created_at": 1719367474,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"91c23ae9792946ba69de9abe2aa994e6681ae97b65cc6250676d3d16fff17ada",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"14a20900a7d2c06feabf6de5e26cd81e38fb615cf87d5e3c2121c79a5c52b903",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3bcc5632a4e750953a2016f991ad8caeb18ce7537b82f25e22c0bd3b9003d8b8"
],
[
"p",
"34134b9e1cbb322582bca4020a39cc1256036d1f5e98effcc838b421fc209d48"
],
[
"p",
"572aa88414c6b1443082fe6d6a70b0a5a132355e2677c6723f2a0200e266a569"
]
],
"content": "I see we just aren't getting anywhere because we don't trust each other's sources. Fine. How about we trust the commercial viability of an entire pair of flights that fly right over the south pole daily, each way, and has been doing so for decades?\n\nQantas QF 64 \u0026 it's return are daily flights that couldn't possibly be commerically viable if they flew over a flat earth. No matter if you beleive that the south pole is a perimeter wall or not, with no globe the huge distance between Sydney \u0026 Johannesburg would require more fuel than you could fill up the entire inside of the plane with! \n\nHave any flat earthers explained (credibly) how the hundreds of people each day that take that flight were not really going over antartica like they thought they were, and didn't really arrive just a few hours (instead of days) like their tickets said they did?\n\nFor that matter, a flat earth would have flights over the north pole, like JL41 from Tokyo to London, go a lot faster than the curved path that they say they take. What are those flights doing up there for so long? Circling iceburgs to fool us all about the nature of the planet instead of commercially competing against rival flights?\n\n",
"sig": "86b2b69b55d5d85ffa183b733e484c48759a69027f6b9b3f6fc5836cbec3fe734df8eb1dbcc5a98ad3ccc1575f39f4c881e929ba916caded534b1ed2808e7302"
}