A few thoughts on the game theory of tainted bitcoin.
TLDR; taint cannot work over time.
Let's visualize a possible scenario where a jurisdiction, for example the EU, decides to classify certain bitcoin addresses as tainted.
A few expected outcomes:
1. Many entrepreneurs would likely leave the EU in reaction, either because they own bitcoin or because they consider the regulatory move to be a red flag indicating more coming authoritarian measures. If A happens, then a logical B can be expected to follow.
These entrepreneurs won't take their bitcoin *with them* because all bitcoin exists globally without borders and their bitcoin are already waiting for them in the new jurisdiction. Their bitcoin does not move when they move, but their spending is now relocated outside of the backwards jurisdiction.
2. Let's then assume that some entrepreneurs have had their bitcoins classified as tainted by the EU. As they settle in a new jurisduction - which doesn't care about the EU:s taint decisions - these "EU-tainted" coins are soon entering the economy and switching hands. Nobody in a free economy has any reason to care about the dictatorial phantasmas of the EU.
3. After these coins/sats spread in the free market economy, they will eventually end up in contact with the EU again. At that point, the coins are now integrated in the economy and the "EU-taint" will be considered obsolete.
If the EU decides to keep rejecting the "EU-tainted" coins/sats, the EU will lose out on more and more commerce due to self-quarantine. The number of tainted coins will grow over time and the EU will have to eliminate themselves from an in increasing amount of valuable trade.
Over time the taint policy will become so ridiculous and economically harmful for the EU that there won't be any public support to keep the taint regulations.
Besides, as the coins/sats have moved through the free, prosperous and just jurisdictions of the world where property rights are respected, the laggard economies that issued the taint will have little incentive to remain laggards. Or Lagarde's, as they may end up being called.
Don't be a Laggarde!
#Bitcoin #Taint #GameTheory #PropertyRights #Property #Rights #IndividualRights #Individual #FreeMarkets #Free #Markets #Voluntarism #Libertarian
Leo Fernevak
npub1y02…fvpl
2024-05-25 23:25:22
Author Public Key
npub1y02f89rpykzhqmrjjz99uwgyl9gh06sg0vpjmklu62rzxpx8mxps7zfvplPublished at
2024-05-25 23:25:22Event JSON
{
"id": "40c4a8292c4c7eec428c604774cea01c924de6c4eb2bff0a8111ea2f958c3952",
"pubkey": "23d49394612585706c72908a5e3904f95177ea087b032ddbfcd2862304c7d983",
"created_at": 1716672322,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"Bitcoin"
],
[
"t",
"bitcoin"
],
[
"t",
"Taint"
],
[
"t",
"taint"
],
[
"t",
"GameTheory"
],
[
"t",
"gametheory"
],
[
"t",
"PropertyRights"
],
[
"t",
"propertyrights"
],
[
"t",
"Property"
],
[
"t",
"property"
],
[
"t",
"Rights"
],
[
"t",
"rights"
],
[
"t",
"IndividualRights"
],
[
"t",
"individualrights"
],
[
"t",
"Individual"
],
[
"t",
"individual"
],
[
"t",
"FreeMarkets"
],
[
"t",
"freemarkets"
],
[
"t",
"Free"
],
[
"t",
"free"
],
[
"t",
"Markets"
],
[
"t",
"markets"
],
[
"t",
"Voluntarism"
],
[
"t",
"voluntarism"
],
[
"t",
"Libertarian"
],
[
"t",
"libertarian"
]
],
"content": "A few thoughts on the game theory of tainted bitcoin. \n\nTLDR; taint cannot work over time. \n\nLet's visualize a possible scenario where a jurisdiction, for example the EU, decides to classify certain bitcoin addresses as tainted.\n\nA few expected outcomes: \n\n1. Many entrepreneurs would likely leave the EU in reaction, either because they own bitcoin or because they consider the regulatory move to be a red flag indicating more coming authoritarian measures. If A happens, then a logical B can be expected to follow.\n\nThese entrepreneurs won't take their bitcoin *with them* because all bitcoin exists globally without borders and their bitcoin are already waiting for them in the new jurisdiction. Their bitcoin does not move when they move, but their spending is now relocated outside of the backwards jurisdiction.\n\n2. Let's then assume that some entrepreneurs have had their bitcoins classified as tainted by the EU. As they settle in a new jurisduction - which doesn't care about the EU:s taint decisions - these \"EU-tainted\" coins are soon entering the economy and switching hands. Nobody in a free economy has any reason to care about the dictatorial phantasmas of the EU.\n\n3. After these coins/sats spread in the free market economy, they will eventually end up in contact with the EU again. At that point, the coins are now integrated in the economy and the \"EU-taint\" will be considered obsolete. \n\nIf the EU decides to keep rejecting the \"EU-tainted\" coins/sats, the EU will lose out on more and more commerce due to self-quarantine. The number of tainted coins will grow over time and the EU will have to eliminate themselves from an in increasing amount of valuable trade.\n\nOver time the taint policy will become so ridiculous and economically harmful for the EU that there won't be any public support to keep the taint regulations.\n\nBesides, as the coins/sats have moved through the free, prosperous and just jurisdictions of the world where property rights are respected, the laggard economies that issued the taint will have little incentive to remain laggards. Or Lagarde's, as they may end up being called.\n\nDon't be a Laggarde!\n\n#Bitcoin #Taint #GameTheory #PropertyRights #Property #Rights #IndividualRights #Individual #FreeMarkets #Free #Markets #Voluntarism #Libertarian\n",
"sig": "5447ac280797de564d87cc63a0b4509f58cfcd151339197d688dd749c69877499947548a7574e4b698d360dfc9cd68ba2408687a4e1fc0704d04f8efb341676b"
}