Everybody just wanted to believe the idea, so it went unquestioned for twenty years.
All skill levels both under- and overestimate their performance at the same frequency. More skilled people just tend to be less wrong about it.
Blank on Nostr: The ironic thing about people citing the Dunning-Kruger effect is that it isn't real, ...
The ironic thing about people citing the Dunning-Kruger effect is that it isn't real, and was confirmed to just be a statistical artifact of that paper's methodology.
Everybody just wanted to believe the idea, so it went unquestioned for twenty years.
All skill levels both under- and overestimate their performance at the same frequency. More skilled people just tend to be less wrong about it.
Everybody just wanted to believe the idea, so it went unquestioned for twenty years.
All skill levels both under- and overestimate their performance at the same frequency. More skilled people just tend to be less wrong about it.