DJ on Nostr: That may be some legalese peculiar to Canada (NatPo should have provided more context ...

That may be some legalese peculiar to Canada (NatPo should have provided more context for the rest of the anglophone world), but it seems all the more reasonable now to have such questions raised at judicial confirmation hearings in other countries. It shouldn't require a biologist to make such determinations in most court cases. In any event, case law like this must be hell to translate into certain other languages where no one thought to make the same distinctions.