goldfishthumb1 on Nostr: When biological humans proudly post a piece of AI art on social media, the only ...
When biological humans proudly post a piece of AI art on social media, the only avenue of interaction in which enjoyment is quantified, the prompt that encouraged the AI to render the work with precision unmatched by biological humanity in the seconds it took to generate the image is often included.
This serves to denote the minuscule involvement that the user had in the making of the image, which appeared complete and in the blink of an eye.
Should credit for the brilliantly composed picture be given to the user that asked for it, or the synthetic intelligence that rendered it? #asknostr
Published at
2024-06-08 15:08:39Event JSON
{
"id": "2a17fd9928f9143ff98fe69014019d517658833ab5d69b161c422204a7dcbdb6",
"pubkey": "ff18165afde00852d49a4e1316c981c7af0164c1810c0bc0fe41d361dd7ca7f0",
"created_at": 1717852119,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"asknostr"
]
],
"content": "When biological humans proudly post a piece of AI art on social media, the only avenue of interaction in which enjoyment is quantified, the prompt that encouraged the AI to render the work with precision unmatched by biological humanity in the seconds it took to generate the image is often included. \nThis serves to denote the minuscule involvement that the user had in the making of the image, which appeared complete and in the blink of an eye. \nShould credit for the brilliantly composed picture be given to the user that asked for it, or the synthetic intelligence that rendered it? #asknostr",
"sig": "050c61404e3fbec264af1e74861d492fa9ba1f13d290ae4681550aa42df16a6a5d7a80158f9e87a167e59308969786e1141a691bd44bc2be0413998f02ddd016"
}
