📅 Original date posted:2015-09-27
📝 Original message:+1 for deploying BIP65 immediately without further waiting. Agree with
all Peter's points.
If BIP65 has to follow the 0.12 schedule, it will take almost 9 months
from now to complete the softfork. I don't see any good reason to wait
for that long. We have too much talk, too little action.
Some mining pools hinted that they may adopt BitcoinXT at the end of
2015. If we could start deploying BIP65 earlier, they will have a
patched version by the time they switch. Gavin has agreed to support
BIP65 in XT.
By the way, is there any chance to backport it to 0.9? In the deployment
of BIP66 some miners requested a backport to 0.9 and that's why we have
0.9.5.
jl2012 at xbt.hk [ARCHIVE] /
npub1kc…wjfw4
2023-06-07 19:41:25
in reply to nevent1q…eg9m
Author Public Key
npub1kc0zulxt7j4a0ayhzhrz7jk84y7tm4026qcky7w97hlfkxxap24qnwjfw4Published at
2023-06-07 19:41:25Event JSON
{
"id": "2bdf10bd880e37db9dc753696e40d260261dc0f5940786e0000eebb5061ad984",
"pubkey": "b61e2e7ccbf4abd7f49715c62f4ac7a93cbdd5ead0316279c5f5fe9b18dd0aaa",
"created_at": 1686159685,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f5bb1bf208994917ac3ec4154383520df2a8573df815c54d28bae4e41ef024c8",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"2e229faccbc642e5180ffeca0ef5d695f740507ef53c2846cfac9639eae75285",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-09-27\n📝 Original message:+1 for deploying BIP65 immediately without further waiting. Agree with \nall Peter's points.\n\nIf BIP65 has to follow the 0.12 schedule, it will take almost 9 months \nfrom now to complete the softfork. I don't see any good reason to wait \nfor that long. We have too much talk, too little action.\n\nSome mining pools hinted that they may adopt BitcoinXT at the end of \n2015. If we could start deploying BIP65 earlier, they will have a \npatched version by the time they switch. Gavin has agreed to support \nBIP65 in XT.\n\nBy the way, is there any chance to backport it to 0.9? In the deployment \nof BIP66 some miners requested a backport to 0.9 and that's why we have \n0.9.5.",
"sig": "d8310b263c6714b9409b2e41521f517c899323e54c856334974b34f77db4912eb4d228c310bb8ab6e1d6902312380e910696c4c56d7c8eb6e60de4c933f4b48e"
}