Well.... Maybe :)
Incentives are, also, get more zaps. So one should focus on zappers, which may not be the same as focus on larger reach.
And the bitcoiners seed... I think most movements start with narrow focused groups. Makes more sense.
I don't see your reasoning as nonsense, on the contrary it's very based.
But I don't see your examples as crippling by definition.
Generally speaking I see nostr still far away to the point of being inevitable.
Can't make an argument about it now.
ildella / Daniele
npub1ncd…r8ar
2024-04-03 22:05:10
in reply to nevent1q…p728
Author Public Key
npub1ncdaqhk5rea29hdpaxmyhzay3d5mkrattg3dgs4yjkcml99fkqcqz4r8arPublished at
2024-04-03 22:05:10Event JSON
{
"id": "2b6b0e6689e8c72fecee8de9762c021add38703d3edd26df73a2f9bcda8c79d8",
"pubkey": "9e1bd05ed41e7aa2dda1e9b64b8ba48b69bb0fab5a22d442a495b1bf94a9b030",
"created_at": 1712174710,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"bc7b9757677de64501a101bbee14ff7a0ad5c3a1513149c6f0d75c59799bc953",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"ee11a5dff40c19a555f41fe42b48f00e618c91225622ae37b6c2bb67b76c4e49"
]
],
"content": "Well.... Maybe :) \n\nIncentives are, also, get more zaps. So one should focus on zappers, which may not be the same as focus on larger reach. \n\nAnd the bitcoiners seed... I think most movements start with narrow focused groups. Makes more sense. \n\nI don't see your reasoning as nonsense, on the contrary it's very based. \n\nBut I don't see your examples as crippling by definition. \n\nGenerally speaking I see nostr still far away to the point of being inevitable. \n\nCan't make an argument about it now. ",
"sig": "8229c0e4b7bfb9d441b17073db1fa913a163771b809348a277b0769748219a299ec002ce5a0849174067ed5acf028baf80890864f2142b684fcb730d65f8f5e9"
}