While the breakfast question is funny, it's needs to be understood as,
>niggers not acting on hypotheticals are dealing more with reality than day-dreaming Whites who think of ''what if Hitler won ww2?'' hypotheticals and expecting a 2nd coming of him to magically happen to solve all their problems.
My inclination towards what-if questions concerning my everyday life, such as, ''what'd you do if a concrete block fell on your head and you weren't wearing your helmet?'' is ''but I would be wearing my helmet.'' as I know exactly that I would in the what-if scenario, I'm not gonna let the what-if happen. If the concrete block is to fall, I will be wearing my helmet and I could still die or lose a limb even.
Americans ridiculing of any European protest, any show of force by the population shows how truly beaten down they are, thinking both you the only change can happen with violence but acting violently is ''nigger behaviour and I'm not a nigger.'' Bro, niggers rioting in your country gets shit done for them. They are acting out the boomer line,
''The 2nd Amendment is to fight back against a tyrannical government.'' only the reality being that the threat of force from the population is what should have kept the government acting its populous interests. You now using your guns to threaten politicians and get shit done for Whites is just cuck behaviour, not some enlightened state of mind.
If answering the what-if hypothetical only within the conditions of the question, accepting it's premise unquestionably with that leading you down to your doom, what's the upside of being able to do so?
Mr.All Sunday :PeepoSalute: 🇬🇷 /
npub1kdt…2e3c
2024-02-25 08:34:55
Author Public Key
npub1kdtskptlehmx98qpyghq7aaqsh9lh9zvc3vywcu8mzyn04q6ftdsr82e3cPublished at
2024-02-25 08:34:55Event JSON
{
"id": "287e1eb4af4d21abc9554a1a1c3e623565f25c1caf5d8b15ce57c8394bda26c2",
"pubkey": "b3570b057fcdf6629c01222e0f77a085cbfb944cc458476387d88937d41a4adb",
"created_at": 1708846495,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://poa.st/objects/57756f1b-fd2f-4369-9658-350abb5f718b",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "While the breakfast question is funny, it's needs to be understood as, \n\u003eniggers not acting on hypotheticals are dealing more with reality than day-dreaming Whites who think of ''what if Hitler won ww2?'' hypotheticals and expecting a 2nd coming of him to magically happen to solve all their problems. \n\nMy inclination towards what-if questions concerning my everyday life, such as, ''what'd you do if a concrete block fell on your head and you weren't wearing your helmet?'' is ''but I would be wearing my helmet.'' as I know exactly that I would in the what-if scenario, I'm not gonna let the what-if happen. If the concrete block is to fall, I will be wearing my helmet and I could still die or lose a limb even. \n\nAmericans ridiculing of any European protest, any show of force by the population shows how truly beaten down they are, thinking both you the only change can happen with violence but acting violently is ''nigger behaviour and I'm not a nigger.'' Bro, niggers rioting in your country gets shit done for them. They are acting out the boomer line,\n''The 2nd Amendment is to fight back against a tyrannical government.'' only the reality being that the threat of force from the population is what should have kept the government acting its populous interests. You now using your guns to threaten politicians and get shit done for Whites is just cuck behaviour, not some enlightened state of mind. \nIf answering the what-if hypothetical only within the conditions of the question, accepting it's premise unquestionably with that leading you down to your doom, what's the upside of being able to do so?",
"sig": "a5c7d01530512d0b36b3518bd8b934ff4aae995891d604ee9d284df6caf6b97e68e1054c548ec86f2f59f212f6847ffb93d1542fea5d605c975e9e1636f58276"
}