nonymous

Privacy, Freedom and Bitcoin

Public Key

npub105ryja4dpp9qhhsm80459cr9a4jlu398fq8vvjsdq2sewwlctm4st8dqkl

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs86pjfw6kssjstmcdnh66zupj76e07gjn5srkxfgxs9gvh80u9a6cpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds42w9pg

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub105ryja4dpp9qhhsm80459cr9a4jlu398fq8vvjsdq2sewwlctm4st8dqkl

Show more details

Last Notes

2024-07-04 14:19:18

- reply

Not so unpopular…

2024-07-04 09:13:18

- reply

Truth, the noun, is objective. There is only 1 truth, not multiple conflicting truths.
Sentences as “cats are prettier than dogs” are neither true nor false, just opinions. There can be a lot of opinions but it’s not precise to say there are a lot of truths. “Subjective truth” is just an opinion.

2024-07-03 20:12:15

- reply

Last step should say: non-existant State

2024-05-27 19:10:51

KYC laws are evil
https://privatekeys.org/2024/05/14/against-kyc-laws/

2024-05-11 14:29:15

- reply

Unfortunately it’s not paid. He is so stupid to believe what he says

2024-05-08 12:51:23

- reply

Do we need to trust the CEO of Signal? I thought the protocol is safe and built with strong privacy so the communications are private. I dont have the skills myself to review the source code but a lot of people have and I think they have reviewed it. Isnt that the case?

2023-08-06 08:49:43

- reply

X …right? Which X?

2023-03-16 23:38:56

- reply

Isn’t enough 2T???? I think is a giant amount! Its ridiculously big.

2023-03-14 09:50:41

- reply

I think millionaire. And I think it would mean “rich” again.

2023-03-13 17:29:25

- reply

Exactly! The best investment strategy is to bet all in Vegas, to black or red. If you win you have 100% profit, if you lose, don’t worry… loses are socialized.
Or
Better… you do it multiple times. 50% of the times you get the profit. 50% of times everybody share the loses. So statistically you only win.

2023-03-13 09:07:54

- reply

“There is no bailout” is the new “there is no inflation” 😂😂😂

2023-03-13 00:34:22

- reply

I don’t understand who sells bitcoin. No ratio makes sense. Why sell 1 scarce unit, the sat, for whatever amount of dollars when an infinite amount of $ can be created at 0 cost? No ratio makes sense.

2023-03-11 10:34:05

- reply

And what is worse, the game it plays is to break fungibility. In its game each sat is different and unique.

2023-03-11 10:28:47

- reply

Agree! One of these is an attack vector that helps to slow the transition between the slavery based fiat world to the freedom based bitcoin world.

2023-03-11 10:08:50

- reply

Easy to determine. No bank is safe. Bank is synonym for counter-party risk.

2023-03-11 09:58:36

- reply

Es una cuestión semántica. Depende de lo que signifique que sea tuyo. Si es “legalmente”, sí es tuyo. Si es que puedes hacer con él lo que quieras cuando quieras, claramente no. El dinero en el banco está lleno de restricciones. Una lista cada vez mayor de restricciones. “Otros” juzgan permanentemente si aceptan o no lo que quieres hacer con tu dinero.

2023-03-11 08:17:46

- reply

But isn’t that true for all kinds of trust? All trust is fine if it is not violated. That is precisely the problem with trust in general: That depends on someone.

2023-03-10 08:20:35

- reply

What is MEV?

2023-03-09 18:51:05

- reply

That’s good news! Not money and also no value. So… no tax! All European governments please, forget about bitcoin.

2023-03-08 12:20:39

- reply

Are they still pushing their shitcoin?

2023-03-04 19:43:23

- reply

I indeed think it’s interesting for people migrating from Twitter to Nostr. I would prefer all people that I follow on twiter posts the same in Noatr so I would have no incentive to use Twitter anymore.

2023-03-03 08:38:48

- reply

This is quite funny from a Spanish point of view. A Spanish written text has unique pronunciation. Always. It makes no sense to discuss how to pronounce the word. Written and phonetics are the same.

2023-02-28 17:08:50

- reply

Fully agree! Mainstream media is garbage. It’s the “soma” in Brave New World.

2023-02-28 08:32:42

- reply

It’s a joke for us, but unfortunately judges thought the world take him seriously and although at the end he loses, in the process he is doing a lot of harm to devs.

2023-02-27 09:06:22

- reply

I don’t think it is. I think anti fragility is a feature that emerges from the software AND the community/ethos of bitcoin, not only from the software. I also think (and hope) it can get better.

2023-02-26 19:08:01

- reply

Ordinal theory is one thing. Inscriptions are another one (that uses it). Ordinal theory maps each sat to a S/N (an ordinal). Ofc it is an arbitrary order, but a malicious agent (government) could make use of this. Independent of the number of inscriptions. IMO any attempt or means to differentiate one sat from another one is an attack on bitcoin fungibility.

2023-02-26 12:31:27

- reply

Indeed, as long as btc keeps doubling each 4 years, the reward in $ terms is equal or greater. That can continue easily for more than 5 halvings and by then fees can take over.

2023-02-23 09:28:57

- reply

IMO anti fragility is not a binary thing. It depends on the whole community also, not only on the software. If wrong ideas spread into Bitcoin community then Bitcoin can become more fragile. I think ordinals and inscriptions are bad: ordinals proposes a way to break fungibility. Inscriptions gives enemies the opportunity to inscribe “bad jpegs” to allow states to forbid running full nodes. That’s an attack vector that I hope is never used but now it exists and is easy. Also it pushes unwanted MB on lots of node users.
I think the “it’s not spam bc they pay the fees” is a wrong idea that hurts anti fragility. Does not kill it but hurts it.

2023-02-22 10:40:27

- reply

Hashrate per capita! Interesting concept.

2023-02-19 23:23:00

- reply

They don’t understand how pro-censorship people are anti-censorship people 😂😂😂