Privacy advocate, sysadmin, geek. Born and raised on the mean streets of the Chicago suburbs. Contributor to the Sandstorm self-hosting project.
Public Key
npub16wazt7uxw7ssuxz97gelpcd2ha8hjt8fyfd4n2r0uqtk6uyfagrsxjl0ak
Profile Code
nprofile1qqsd8w39lwr80ggwrpzlyvlsux4t7nme9n5jyk6e4ph7q9mdwzy75pcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds2fwzal
Author Public Key
npub16wazt7uxw7ssuxz97gelpcd2ha8hjt8fyfd4n2r0uqtk6uyfagrsxjl0ak Show more details
Published at
2024-05-16T11:28:17+02:00 Event JSON
{
"id": "5f75fe6aa790ebb59d08ba0ea8e3bd39489a43089c12d24986bfc08ce94c849a" ,
"pubkey": "d3ba25fb8677a10e1845f233f0e1aabf4f792ce9225b59a86fe0176d7089ea07" ,
"created_at": 1715851697 ,
"kind": 0 ,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/ocdtrekkie",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://mastodon.social/users/ocdtrekkie",
"pink.momostr"
]
],
"content": "{\"name\":\"ocdtrekkie\",\"about\":\"Privacy advocate, sysadmin, geek. Born and raised on the mean streets of the Chicago suburbs. Contributor to the Sandstorm self-hosting project.\",\"website\":\"https://mastodon.social/@ocdtrekkie\",\"picture\":\"https://files.mastodon.social/accounts/avatars/000/317/757/original/c6436d5583b4d980.jpg\",\"nip05\":\"[email protected] \"}" ,
"sig": "9c4a062b8946b9e39cc5ec8509054f64ce9d9cdc14f043f373a9f9e0be024f059b6d1fd887ce8f8c0d4eb913e510637ab606f949a08d5780f7a40b6af5543e03"
}
Last Notes npub16wazt7uxw7ssuxz97gelpcd2ha8hjt8fyfd4n2r0uqtk6uyfagrsxjl0ak ocdtrekkie But presumably considering the cadence of iOS releases, if they are not meaningfully able to break the most recent iOS update for a few months, you should... always be running something newer than Cellebrite has broken. I suppose if they manage to capture a phone they could keep it powered and charging in a Faraday cage for a couple months, but more than likely, you're not looking at waiting for an AFU unlock, I imagine. npub16wazt7uxw7ssuxz97gelpcd2ha8hjt8fyfd4n2r0uqtk6uyfagrsxjl0ak ocdtrekkie Looks like "an updated iPhone" remains the safest choice, as anyone should already know. A key point here though worth noting is that presumably law enforcement can *keep* a lot of devices in major investigations as long as they need to. So had they not gotten into that phone, they presumably could've just... waited until Cellebrite was able to. npub16wazt7uxw7ssuxz97gelpcd2ha8hjt8fyfd4n2r0uqtk6uyfagrsxjl0ak ocdtrekkie Let's Encrypt is a beautiful gift of free certificates to everyone and also a horrifying single point of failure that happily issues certs to any impersonator with a lookalike domain name. npub16wazt7uxw7ssuxz97gelpcd2ha8hjt8fyfd4n2r0uqtk6uyfagrsxjl0ak ocdtrekkie Hey guys, I just need to throw something out there: The folks who insist on breaking the web for inane reasons like "this completely uncompromised certificate expired less than one day ago" and not making people safer. They're building a fragile house of cards designed to place more reliance entirely on them. And the effect is largely that people from ordinary users to engineers, disregard certificate warnings as a matter of routine. PKI controls the entire web and it's in insane hands. npub16wazt7uxw7ssuxz97gelpcd2ha8hjt8fyfd4n2r0uqtk6uyfagrsxjl0ak ocdtrekkie This might be a compelling option for those of us still running ancient hardware at home that still "runs fine": https://betanews.com/2024/06/27/0patch-will-keep-windows-10-secure-for-at-least-five-more-years-after-microsoft-abandons-it/ It will be less than half Microsoft's cost the first year to do the same first-party, and it doesn't look like they intend to ratchet the price up annually either. npub16wazt7uxw7ssuxz97gelpcd2ha8hjt8fyfd4n2r0uqtk6uyfagrsxjl0ak ocdtrekkie Create the problem and then offer to solve the problem. npub16wazt7uxw7ssuxz97gelpcd2ha8hjt8fyfd4n2r0uqtk6uyfagrsxjl0ak ocdtrekkie So the argument I have heard is basically that yes, he is autistic and that he feels irrationally compelled to defend his positions based on what his brain is processing. As a medically diagnosed autist, I understand this compulsion! I say a lot of unpopular truths (password managers are bad for security!) but I (and RMS) also have the ability to learn and accept new data. And also just when to shut up. npub16wazt7uxw7ssuxz97gelpcd2ha8hjt8fyfd4n2r0uqtk6uyfagrsxjl0ak ocdtrekkie I can't even see that commenter from this server. I try not to apply that label to him because we haven't seen actual evidence of it. But like... it would be weird for someone who isn't to have such strong opinions in favor of the topic, wouldn't it? npub16wazt7uxw7ssuxz97gelpcd2ha8hjt8fyfd4n2r0uqtk6uyfagrsxjl0ak ocdtrekkie Yeah, I'm not speculating as to why, all I'm saying is there is a long and frequent history of him coming to the defense of pedophiles. It's well-documented, and mostly in written form! npub16wazt7uxw7ssuxz97gelpcd2ha8hjt8fyfd4n2r0uqtk6uyfagrsxjl0ak ocdtrekkie The wild thing is that the FSF has other board members, other staff. They could do just fine without him *or even by relegating him to an advisory role*. But they are absolutely incapable of not making a guy a *board member* who repetitively and persistently defends every pedophile he can think of. Like if RMS shut up about things not free software, he would still be gross but he keeps digging a bigger hole. npub16wazt7uxw7ssuxz97gelpcd2ha8hjt8fyfd4n2r0uqtk6uyfagrsxjl0ak ocdtrekkie I mean, IMHO if you want to block anything, you should block it, but I find the idea Zuck is salivating at the idea of getting access to your toots is patently silly. Federating for them is almost certainly about antitrust and DMA compliance, with a tint of "if we're the first big company here we have an advantage" probably. npub16wazt7uxw7ssuxz97gelpcd2ha8hjt8fyfd4n2r0uqtk6uyfagrsxjl0ak ocdtrekkie I look at it as providing an escape hatch. I feel like a lot of people would leave Facebook platforms but feel like they can't because someone they need to follow is there. If people can get their must-haves from proprietary social on ethical social, they have a path to move here. npub16wazt7uxw7ssuxz97gelpcd2ha8hjt8fyfd4n2r0uqtk6uyfagrsxjl0ak ocdtrekkie The notion that the fedi has all this "juicy" data when the fedi was designed to be relatively privacy-protecting from the get-go and Meta has literally hundreds of millions of users running their invasive software directly is... sort of silly.