Bowsac Noodle ☦️ / is on Nostr

Distributist. Interested in philosophy and meta critiques. Myer's Briggs says I like to argue. I try to chat in good faith and assume the same from you until proven otherwise. Live, laugh, grill. Jesus Christ is Lord.
Also found @[email protected]

Last Notes

2024-05-08 02:44:34

- reply

You should invite some mates over and hold a sausage fest (actually making sausage and drinking with the lads)

2024-05-08 02:33:18

- reply

The White man uses every part of the sheep.

2024-02-18 23:09:25

- reply

>You know how you stop corruption? By not being corruptable.
I think pollution is going to cause a need to rethink or adapt this view. Even the most gigachad frog can be turned gay by atrazine, and I do not doubt that similar compounds exist which can damage the brain or genome of even the most Aryan phenotypes. Corruption must be shielded against at all levels, and virtue, being a trait not monopolized by any one group, is one of the best defenses. It's a multi pronged attack against the spirit, will, and body of Man by wicked beasts and their dysgenic allies.

2024-02-18 23:01:07

- reply

Every good man who longs for a wife should be able to breed and find one. The death of social media and consequently hookup culture would be all it takes for this to happen. Normalize slut shaming and public ridicule of the adulterous. Tomatoes and stockades for every thot.

2024-02-18 22:48:25

- reply

>Eventually quantity gains a quality of its own, but that's the quality of a numerous and effective anthill.
I think there's more nuance than that. Genetic quality exists across every group, and a lot of the graincels have been slaughtered first over time, repeatedly, throughout history. It's possibly refined them somewhat, although maybe they've just been breeding farms for their adjacent warrior castes.

2024-02-18 22:25:13

- reply

>Being a moralist for anti-natal policy is absurd. It's not a high ground position.
I am not antinatalist. I am above replacement demographics in my own household and, God willing, still going in that department. I don't understand how you're equating "child brides are bad" with that.

2024-02-18 22:21:25

- reply

>the idea they need to go to karen school first before they can be wives
What do you mean "Karen school".
There is value in an educated or at least intelligent woman raising and educating your children. It's not as if a woman is suddenly infertile when she turns 20, hell even 30. Being on birth control for a decade+ will likely hinder things for a lot of women though.

2024-02-18 22:12:18

- reply

I don't enjoy discussing age of consent and adjacent topics, because even the most academic purpose forces one to tangentially defend nonces.
>Vikings.
Irrelevant. People used to filet their enemies alive as punishment, and I also don't support that.
>Your frame is simply dishonest.
I might be wrong about various things, but at no point am I dishonest.
>demographic territory competition
Phenotypic r/k expression is a real thing. There are many ways to solve the reproductive imbalance it potentially creates that don't involve defense of child brides. To name a few (not even supporting all of these, but it's top of my head): stop dysgenic social policies, stop incentivizing broken homes, sterility treatments for people with too many kids and criminality, deportation, segregation, actual enforcement of law as written rather than anarchotyranny, etc.
>Sharia
Many ways to skin that cat as you can see above.

2024-02-18 21:10:20

- reply

>well I said we should treat women like property to save our demographics, so in the mind of some random homo this means "you want kids raped!" I said dude that's a pretty dishonest argument, and he just repeated the same nonsense like 100 times.
From what I remember, you defended Islam whole cloth and refused to concede that some of its worst attributes are fundamentally incompatible with Europeans, such as Mohammed's child brides. I recall seeing you double down on the women are property line to absurdity. Maybe I'm misremembering, but if not that's a very bad take.