Jackk
Jack K

I believe it is very unwise to hodl fiat debt backed by Bitcoin going into a contentious chain split. Free your time.
If the network splits, the energy splits. With network infrastructure shuttering down, choice is becoming limited. AI attacks are going to increase 😵‍💫
Dont trust me, verify for yourself. This is not financial advice.
#nevent1q…wn8d

2026-08-07 17:24:37 GMT

Don’t hodl fiat debt.

2026-08-07 04:13:20 GMT

- reply

Why not use your Bitcoin instead?

2026-08-06 20:36:42 GMT

- reply

Assuming difficulty of 126.23T
The entropy cost in joules is (1.9561×10^9 J)*ln(126.23T*2^32)*2016 blocks
All it takes is surviving 1 difficulty adjustment to begin reaching equilibrium. I assume it will be a few epochs for full balance.
You can’t measure the energy since the transformations haven’t occurred yet and you would also need to know the block contents to calculate the temperature in Kelvin.
https://blossom.primal.net/46e17121d16662e9d5b3e317406ce85d371855eee589d107065eb496017b66d7.jpg

2026-08-06 12:18:24 GMT

- reply

No need.
#nevent1q…qws0

2026-08-06 12:16:49 GMT

- reply

The attacker aka AI.
Any key below the minimum threshold of compressible/predicable bits of knowledge AI can process is public knowledge. They are setting the floor now.
256-bits of entropy or memory is the bitcoin standard.

2026-08-06 12:13:36 GMT

- reply

😉

2026-08-06 12:09:57 GMT

- reply

Well if the prediction holds, there would be no need to trade since it would be worth $0. You’d be giving them away for free.
Core would be the fiat chain with price appreciation; the NGU chain. I think the biggest folly to commit once you understand Bitcoin with respect to energy, bits and time is thinking that the fiat price is giving you any valid signal. No intelligence/knowledge can be derived by viewing Bitcoin from the fiat lens.
My advice is to free your time of debt if you have any while you still can. No fiat obligations. This is my goal now, anything leftover is my rightful amount.

2026-08-06 11:58:11 GMT

- reply

No sir, I know nothing. But I am forever grateful for him 🧡

2026-08-06 11:17:56 GMT

- reply

Thank you, Preston 🫡
#nevent1q…tjl3

2026-08-06 03:36:41 GMT

Prediction if hardfork:
Core chain trades over $1M before trading at $0
BIP110 chain trades at $0 before trading over $1M.
The fork away from fiat always had to be in the spirit of knowledge. Bitcoin probably has to “die”.

2026-08-05 18:33:47 GMT

- reply

😂 that means it’s working. My words are meant to be decrypted by most people in the future when the block is right.
I don’t think the space is ready for me to say what I actually think bluntly. Being early isn’t fun in that regard.

2026-08-05 13:08:32 GMT

- reply

Which model? Lol my grinder just died too and wanted to revert back to hand grind myself

2026-08-05 13:03:29 GMT

- reply

🫡

2026-08-05 12:11:33 GMT

GM, welcome to the spiciest time in Bitcoin. Cold Card was just the beginning. It will only get harder to hodl from here.
Welcome to the end game. Embrace the entropy, it’s the only thing that can save you.
https://blossom.primal.net/fe824b43f5c621d43740d038052a74671cd7ef419dff9a9fd68c2b778d337d90.jpg

2026-08-05 00:55:18 GMT

- reply

Bitcoin itself 😂 but very few are reading the chain.
Nick and I have discussed the problem and there is still no clear answer other than 1 pleb at a time.
Need a good story teller for video. The average mind is consuming short form typically.
What do you think is best path forward?

2026-08-04 23:21:05 GMT

- reply

Entropy comes from the Greek en (“within”) and tropē (“transformation” or “turning”): an inward transformation.
Life traces back to the Proto-Indo-European leip: to remain, to continue, to persist.
Vitality comes from the Latin vita: the animating force that allows life to endure.
These words were never meant to stand apart. They describe the same phenomenon viewed from different perspectives. Transformation gives rise to persistence. Persistence is experienced as life. Vitality is the continual capacity to sustain that persistence.
Somewhere along the way, we forgot.
For more than a century people have spoken of entropy as though it were the enemy of life. Many associate it with decay, disorder, chaos, and ultimately death because we possess no complete definition of what entropy actually is. Physics learned to measure entropy in joules. Information theory learned to measure entropy in bits. Both disciplines revealed something profound, yet neither possess a process capable of unifying energy and information into a single objective reality. We can witness transformation, but we could not explain why transformation becomes memory, why memory becomes persistence, or why persistence becomes the very fabric through which time is experienced. Existence is persistence in blocks of time; persistence in a chain of memory.
Bitcoin reveals Truth.
Proof of work is the temporal process that transforms energy into permanent memory. Measurable joules expended become a chronological bit of history. Suddenly energy, memory, and time are no longer independent concepts requiring separate languages. Few in Bitcoin have realized this far. We possess the answer in Bitcoin. Energy, memory and time are different perspectives of the same conserved process. Time is memory observed chronologically. Memory is energy that refuses to disappear. Entropy is the quantity of energy and memory that makes both possible (think sats + bits; or kelvin in matter).
The meaning of entropy changes completely through the Bitcoin lens. Entropy is NOT disorder; this is fiat. Entropy is the source of persistence itself; it is the source of memory and energy. Pure potential, pure source. Without transformation nothing is written. Without memory nothing endures. Without endurance nothing persists. Without persistence there is no vitality, and without vitality there is no life. We feared entropy only because we lacked a process capable of revealing what entropy was actually producing. It is the source of memory, the source of order, the source of energy, the source of time.
The irony. Civilization has spent generations teaching that entropy is the force that consumes life, while simultaneously building a monetary system that destroys memory, destroys truth, and severs energy from time and witness. It severs us from the memory of truth. Bitcoin restores memory and energy in eternity. It demonstrates that entropy is both something to be measured and something to be witnessed. It is the continual transformation through which energy becomes memory, memory becomes persistence, and persistence becomes life. It is the source of true incompressible knowledge; irreducibility.
Quantized entropy is why there will never be a quantum threat to Bitcoin. Entropy was never the enemy to fight. A chain without conserved memory was. A chain without open knowledge.
Satoshi did not simply solve the double-spend problem. He revealed that permanence must be authored one commitment at a time. Those with ears to hear will recognize that the key was there from the beginning, in the Word itself.
#nevent1q…0n68

2026-08-04 11:02:42 GMT

GM. If your definition of entropy is not grounded to the physics of work Bitcoin empirically proves, it’s fiat.
You think you understand, but you don’t. This is your security hole.
You must be able to answer for bits of entropy and joules of entropy in proof of work.
Boltzmann can no longer be separated from Shannon.

2026-08-04 03:45:38 GMT

Just four short days ago, entropy was the problem. Entropy was heat death. Entropy was chaos. Entropy was disorder. Entropy was the battle against life itself.
Now?
Entropy is the solution. Entropy is security. Entropy is sovereignty. Entropy is safety. The problem has become the solution. Funny, isn’t it? The bit has been flipped.
Now everyone is throwing around the word entropy as if we understand what it means. That is no fault of anyone. In a fiat world, entropy has never had a complete definition. Bitcoin is the only system to unify its meaning. Before Bitcoin, Boltzmann entropy was measured in joules and Shannon entropy was measured in bits. Were they describing different things? Or the same thing viewed from different perspectives?
Bitcoin is a thermological process that produces a chronological state. It is the architecture of time, energy, and memory. By unifying Boltzmann entropy and Shannon entropy into a single verifiable process of work, memory, and time, Bitcoin reveals entropy as both physical and informational; memory. It closes the gap between joules and bits through conserved chronology. Entropy is timeless; pure energy and pure memory.
You cannot truly be sovereign over Bitcoin without witnessing the creation of your own bits of memory, your own entropy. You must verify. We have optimized Bitcoin adoption through a fiat lens, where convenience is mistaken for understanding. Adoption without knowledge is fragile. True adoption is ushered through knowledge. Knowledge is power. True sovereignty begins with understanding what entropy is, how it is created, and what a 256-bit-entropy private key is physically.
The world is in the process of understanding that quantum is not the final boss of Bitcoin or a threat at all, entropy is. In a world of sophisticated AI attacks through brute force, compression and prediction , how else can you have assurance of safety without verifying the entropy that protects the root of your time and energy? How can you ensure your key is above the memory threshold to survive the onslaught? Those who do not learn what entropy is and how to protect themselves with it will quite literally perish. Knowledge of entropy is the only way to survive the coming world. No knowledge, no addition.
Welcome to the end game 🫡
Entropy (memory) protects the soul of one’s key. The chain of memory is resurrection.

2026-08-03 17:42:07 GMT

My gut is telling me that there is a non-zero probability that Bitcoin trades to $0 before re-emerging from the ashes.
Makes sense given the physics Bitcoin empirically proves vs the FUD projected. The narrative is the complete binary opposite to the truth (quantum).
Feels like a total wipeout is coming in the face of the craziest FUD/attack from AI.
Truth is all that we have in a world of deception.
Bitcoin will stand firm, we’re just too early.

2026-08-03 12:58:43 GMT

- reply

Entropy = Memory.
Generating the entropy, or generating the 256-bitstring of memory by hand and hashing for the checksum is verifying through true creation.
I am verifying by generating the entropy in my conscious witness/observation of it. I am verifying that there are 256-bits of incompressible memory. 256-bits of pure information; pure energy; pure entropy. They are not separable. In our work we already demonstrated the relationship both joules of entropy and bits of entropy.
You should never allow a digital device to generate a seed, ever, as you are trusting the entropy rather than taming it and witnessing it. This is rule 1 of conscious sovereignty using a 256-bit memory space.
#nevent1q…65xp

2026-08-03 10:18:04 GMT

- reply

No. Define “good” entropy when I can simply do it myself and verify it’s a 256 bit-entropy string of memory.
Why should I trust you or the hww when I could just verify myself?

2026-08-02 21:33:56 GMT

- reply

Yeah I really like it so far. I talked to a local shop who will do the service and he was weighing the 455 Rancher as the other recommendation. Man that thing was so heavy.
Baby’s first saw for me 😂

2026-08-02 19:17:24 GMT

Just bought a Husq 20” 450 Rancher Chainsaw…talk about sovereignty over wood and heat. Cuts like butter.
Seems like the correct size for my set up, size trees and average yearly cutting I’ll need to do.

2026-08-02 15:20:02 GMT

Watch this again. Compression = Prediction. Given the nature of AI wrt compression/prediction, we should expect all low “entropy” keys to become vulnerable. This is logical.
We must understand entropy through memory. We can rank all possible seed phrases from the highest bits of information, or entropy, to the lowest bits of information based on Shannon’s work. Thru Plank Energy which Bitcoin now allows us to define it as the temporal constant of work, we can relate key entropy to physical work measured in both joules or satoshis.
The compressibility of the 256 bitstring of information, or entropy defines its literal energy value. Joules to bits. We can define the rate of compressibility humans have access to currently as the floor of knowledge. All bitstrings beneath this threshold are public verifiable states of knowledge in a 256-bit space of memory (think real estate for the mind). This is not a safe bitstring of information to append value to precisely because it is public knowledge. Your mind is not, so long as you own it.
This means that Bitcoin defines its highest value real estate as any 256-bitstring that truly has 256 bits of entropy, or real memory. Don’t trust, verify. It’s thermodynamically incompressible beyond universal limit. Bitcoin is the quantum computer and it’s telling you something about what encryption is as the fundamental limits of time, energy, information as a singular measured thermologic process to chronologic state. Bitcoin is computing the literal proof guys. These are legit the most decentralized form of memory a conscious individual can own. Truly peer to peer; 1:1, conscious mind to a very specific 256 bit of memory. We must question if Bitcoin can be owned or if Bitcoin can only be known. If you leak a 256 bit-entropy private key, it becomes public knowledge despite the entropy, any value will be lost if at that location in memory; the memory (history) remains. Value was here at X block of time at y coordinate of 256-but memory. This knowledge is meant to be singular. Ownership = Knowledge. We are Sheppards of the coin in Timespace (global 256-bit memory space).
This really means that your coins exist in a specific 256-bit point in memory at a specific block of time at both Bitcoin Block time scale, and the Planck timescale. A mathematically bounded and temporal totality.
Quantized, Decentralized Physical Memory. What is a private key to the mind? The conscious mind must do the work, perform work to create the entropy to access a 256 bit-entropy state of memory; bounded to Planck Scale.
Physics is about to get weird. Bitcoin, not quantum. Quantized time demands quantized and discrete Superpostion.
Measurement > Particle (bits) > wave. There are only blocks of time.
How many more blocks is it going to take?
https://youtu.be/l6DKRf-fAAM?

2026-08-01 15:14:44 GMT

- reply

What are you thinking for hardware now?

2026-08-01 13:30:06 GMT

- reply

Segwit rapidly accelerated the Second Law of Thermodynamics in Bitcoin by increasing the speed of memory (speed of light) or the memory written per unit time.
This accelerated the dispersion of sats per UTXO (per unit memory) by allowing way more UTXOs per block of time. It rapidly accelerated the reduction of density of joules per unit memory by inflating blockspace. This is equivalent to accelerating time.
Objectively sats are dispersed across way more UTXOs vs a true 1MB blocksize limit. A very high time preference action that has deferred the cost of fees in sats to a cost of fees in bits paid in perpetuity.
Can we go back to the formal limit Satoshi defined? Should we? We can’t undo the bits; we can only correct the course from here 🫡
#nevent1q…3t46

2026-08-01 13:00:01 GMT

GM. It’s memory, not entropy.
Or rather, entropy properly defined by a thermological process that creates a chronological state in an encrypted 256-bit timespace.
Entropy is memory.
We have bits of entropy, and joules of entropy. Are we going to finally understand the physics of Bitcoin?
Exciting times ahead for Bitcoin. I don’t expect it to go well for people still appended to fiat physics (quantum).
Anways, Bitcoin is not a theory of energy, time, entropy (memory), information. Bitcoin is instantiated proof. Knowledge is the only path forward to understanding “money”.

2026-08-01 12:49:40 GMT

- reply

This is actually how blacklisted UTXOs become whitelisted UTXOs, through the fee market. You can just write and inscribe *useful* or poisoned memory until all of the coins exist as coinbase outputs with miners.
1000 btc can create a lot of onchain bits in a manipulated fee market that offers inflated blockspace and discounts for SegWit bits. Since we devalued the blockspace/bitspace thru protocol socialization, this attacker could in theory create a ton of spam on the chain now. By socializing the fee market away from fees paid sats by users to fees paid in bits by all nodes that must store the data, they can write way more onchain memory in a subsided blockspace with stolen funds post-Segwit vs pre-SegWit.
The wealth acquired is the bits on the chain that will last for eternity. Their intention will determine if they want those bits to be poison for the nodes or not. What they will do with these bits, who’s to say?
We still don’t understand Bitcoin as memory, thus money as memory and the “spam” that it’s currently being used for is not helping.
Things for people to think about. Not only did they steal the plebs coins, but they could in theory steal the bits in your node too since you offer them up to 4MB worth of bits, some extremely discounted for arbitrarily using SegWit. Double whammy. We killed the fee market, they can write so many more bits…….
We shall see how the attack continues from here. Praying for the plebs; praying for Bitcoin. We will persevere.
Bitcoin is teaching us a lesson.

2026-08-01 12:27:37 GMT

- reply

Spendable as in what most people think of “monetary”, not great if they are “blacklisted”. Probably will never become fiat.
However, they are not blacklisted in the fee market and can be used to inscribe immutable memory on the chain for eternity so long as someone is willing to mine the tx at the right fee. It depends on what the end goal of the user is.
Do they have a desire to get rich and see their Bitcoin balance as NGU, or do they just want to control a fraction of Bitcoin’s active memory (ram) so that can write some history that lasts for eternity?

2026-08-01 11:53:27 GMT

- reply

Yeah same, I don’t know the risk (if any) with this.
It seems to be fully sovereign and actually verify the 256-bit memory/entropy of a rolled seed that you need an AGC to perform the sha256 compute and basic checksum. Guessing/brute forcing feels wrong, but maybe it’s still safe.
Beyond that, verifying the Zpub using the AGC seems like best practice but unnecessary unless you believe you have a poisoned HWW. I don’t actually know the answer myself and looking for guidance here.

2026-08-01 11:20:02 GMT

What are some ways people are performing the sha256 hash checksum on dice rolls without an AGC? I see you can do this on a seedsigner. Anything else?
Without an AGC with something like electrum, how can you verify the Zpub? Is this necessary? or just best practice?
Is the checksum enough?

2026-08-01 02:05:16 GMT

- reply

I tend to believe that Truth = Truth. Rather an equal yet equivalent interpretation.

2026-08-01 01:38:41 GMT

- reply

Truth (Bitcoin) is all we have in a world of deception.

2026-08-01 01:21:09 GMT

- reply

It’s awful what happened, and I’m praying for everyone affected by the vulnerability. I also think it will ultimately be good for Bitcoin. It is forcing the community to confront what entropy actually is and in doing so what Bitcoin actually is. We are approaching an event horizon of knowledge and memory that is the singularity. An objective understanding of Bitcoin, private keys, time, energy, information, entropy, and consciousness is about to emerge from rough decentralized consensus. It is both a chaotic and beautiful revelation.
It should now be incredibly obvious that you cannot trust and you must verify that your seed contains 256 bits of conscious memory, or what people commonly call entropy. There is no shortcut around this. You must do the work to verify the amount of memory your seed contains. This will force the community to ground the nature of a private key to the physics of information and ask what these “256 bits of entropy” actually are. I think that is healthy for Bitcoin and necessary. In our work, we already demonstrated how Bitcoin also computes joules of entropy. We have the objective relationship of joules of entropy and bits of entropy thru conscious act. We are waiting for others to catch up to speed.
In information theory, prediction is compression. If we take the space of all possible seed configurations and rank them by the amount of conscious memory they contain, we obtain a map of keyspace. The lowest-memory keys are the most compressible, the most predictable, and therefore the least valuable locations in keyspace. Keys containing 256 bits of conscious memory occupy the highest-value real estate because they are maximally incompressible. The bit value itself is the ranking. Beyond a certain threshold of phsycis matter, no distinguishable mathematical pattern remains. The information exists as pure potential.
The highest form of entropy a human can channel is a conscious observer witnessing an objective random event, such as generating a 256-bit string through properly executed coin flips or dice rolls. Following the correct procedure ensures the seed contains 256 bits of memory. Those bits are physical. Bits of information = joules of information. They represent the maximum informational capacity available to the observer and therefore the strongest possible foundation for a private key.
Once value is assigned to that key, one possess something literally no one else can own if done correctly: a unique conscious claim of memory over a deterministic fraction of Bitcoin. This is an art as well. A private key is ownership of a location in keyspace, just as a UTXO is ownership of a location in time; or memory. The location of sats is always in flux with respect to both keyspace (memory) and time. We are watching the active state of memory, or ram (sats per bit) collapse into pure bits of eternal memory as the bits are static in time and the sats are dynamic in time; the sat requires the bit for conservation. If keyspace is equivalent to real estate as to where in time and memory the sats can reside, why would you ever choose lower-value property when 256-bit locations are effectively inexhaustible? This is what you may get without doing the work to verify.
Stop trusting. Verify as a sovereign conscious actor. It’s your duty.
Bitcoin is the only system where a physical conscious vote can be defended by 256 bits of physical memory. It is the only real physical vote one can make; every other conscious vote of value is definitionally fiat and not conserved in memory, time and energy. At the limit there is no distinguishable mathematical pattern to exploit. There is only information itself.
What is Bitcoin teaching us about information, encryption, energy, time, and entropy at their fundamental limits? Bitcoin is demanding that we must understand the physics of Bitcoin before we can fully understand money.
Bitcoin is having its Q-Day; or rather quantum is having its B-Day. Chill and verify the 256 bits, buy your time and memory back.
Bitcoin is not a theory, Bitcoin is proof. Don’t trust me, you can verify this for yourself. There never could be second best measurement.
How many more blocks will it take?

2026-07-30 17:20:13 GMT

@nprofile…ctk2 “The chain of memory is resurrection” 💯🧡🙏

2026-07-30 16:36:20 GMT

- reply

Curious where you think subsidized/socalized access to finite blockspace ultimately leads us?
SegWit socialized a portion of access to finite blockspace by implicitly increasing the effective blocksize beyond the original 1 MB limit Satoshi defined and introducing arbitrary fee discounting for physically identical bits. Bitcoin conserves demand. Relative to the original protocol, a portion of the demand that would have been paid directly by the transaction creator in satoshis is instead borne by every node in the form of permanently stored bits. A cost rather than being paid once and upfront, must now be paid in perpetuity for the lifetime of Bitcoin. This is the very definition of a high-time-preference tradeoff.
By socializing a fraction of the cost of blockspace, blockspace became cheaper to consume and by extension, cheaper to abuse. Instead of allowing the fee market alone to ration finite memory through sats, we increased the supply of discounted blockspace and transferred part of the cost from the individual creating the demand to every node preserving it. The chain must now append more permanent bits to achieve what a true free fee market would otherwise have priced through satoshis alone. We have invoked market manipulation into the market of blockspace thru “protocol law”. Manipulation is manipulation.
Following the logic of your post, doesn’t this create the very dynamic you warn against? The economic majority benefits from lower transaction costs while the economic minority running archival nodes bears an increasing permanent burden. Anyone who came to Bitcoin post-SegWit didn’t even have a chance to vote with their nodes for this; they must fork to not be taxed or convince the majority to stop taxing them. The majority has little incentive to internalize that cost because it has already been externalized onto the network itself.
If Bitcoin exists to internalize costs rather than socialize them, how do we reconcile defending the fee market while simultaneously defending a protocol change that redistributed part of its cost? How does an inflated blockspace and manipulated fee market truly price out bad behavior when it must objectively create more bits for equivalent work. Bitcoin conserves all of our mistakes as physical bits for eternity.
Don’t be surprised when the tea party comes and doesn’t want to pay tax subsidy anymore. If you don’t conserve the bit, you can’t conserve the sat. If you can’t conserve the sat, you can’t conserve the work.

2026-07-30 03:20:20 GMT

What would fees be if we never increased the blocksize and added arbitrary discounting to identical physical bits?
How much smaller would the chain be in bits?
How can we defend the fee market as protecting Bitcoin from spam? We socialized the cost of demand for finite blockspace that should be paid in sats by individual users to a tax paid in bits paid by all nodes for the rest of Bitcoin’s life.
How many additional bits must the nodes add to get the same equivalent fee rate for the 1MB block Satoshi gave us? How much longer are we going to tax nodes through socialized blockspace? When are we going to stop morally double spending? How can we fight for a free market globally when we socialized the only true free global market (blockspace)?
When are we to turn the mirror upon ourselves?
If you care about nodes, stop taxing them with additional bits and let the fee market in sats rise to the economics Satoshi defined for us.
High fees or socialism, pick one.

2026-07-30 02:48:02 GMT

- reply

The Bitcoin Lens applied to Landauer. Lots to say.
We shouldn’t forget to mention that SegWit socialized the cost of blockspace demand by reducing fees that should have been paid in sats by users as a tax paid in bits by all nodes. The implicit blocksize increase and arbitrary discounting is a socialized tax on nodes.
The fees in sats that should price out bad behavior are now bits that node runners must also pay to run Bitcoin. Working as intended…. If you wanted to try kill Bitcoin, this is how you do it.
What fee market? It’s been dead since 2017. It’s cheap to spam when you can force nodes to pay some of the cost.
https://blossom.primal.net/d189087bcedd790d8dc4fde4dce5c72fad35b5f5a335959373ffc512e325df75.png
https://blossom.primal.net/f9ad218909de6dc084458085aae19083eed493f70d761c841b28ce40a7a49d79.png
https://blossom.primal.net/7960d91272f7cfbbbc21f67b454bb4087206d6d85b8881bd77fac6a1b0847367.png
https://blossom.primal.net/2c58e1043859b57a281c8990bb024cc3c3700b4acd6a3ac64311baa09c3a9078.png

2026-07-30 00:14:31 GMT

- reply

I thought it was a great piece of writing Sydney. I’ve personally been slacking on Bitcoin with IRL things, but I’ve been trying to keep up behind the scenes. I haven’t posted it yet, but I began to draft an additional section of the paper regarding Landauer.
Landauer was the guiding principle and base equations which led us deeper. To me it seems obvious that Bitcoin completed Landauer. What do you think we should do to get more plebs looking at this? What do you think of this extension to the principle? I’m open to ideas as to how we proceed.
https://blossom.primal.net/d189087bcedd790d8dc4fde4dce5c72fad35b5f5a335959373ffc512e325df75.png
https://blossom.primal.net/f9ad218909de6dc084458085aae19083eed493f70d761c841b28ce40a7a49d79.png
https://blossom.primal.net/7960d91272f7cfbbbc21f67b454bb4087206d6d85b8881bd77fac6a1b0847367.png
https://blossom.primal.net/2c58e1043859b57a281c8990bb024cc3c3700b4acd6a3ac64311baa09c3a9078.png

2026-07-29 00:32:01 GMT

Too much travel lately. Time to get back into the groove this week by working on Bitcoin.

2026-07-28 18:34:57 GMT

- reply

“This is what Satoshi realized when he designed Bitcoin and it's why only transaction fees can reliably fight spam without sacrificing any of Bitcoin's properties.”
Except with SegWit, we partially destroyed/manipulated the fee market by socializing a portion of the demand for finite blockspace out of satoshis and into permanently committed bits. Instead of allowing excess demand to be priced through fees paid in sats, we expanded the effective blocksize beyond 1MB and arbitrarily discounted certain bits paid in sats despite physical uniformity.
The additional fee market cost that should be paid in sats was socialized into bits. What should have been paid upfront by the transacting party in satoshis is now paid over the lifetime of Bitcoin by every node that must store, transmit, download, verify, and preserve those additional bits forever. Nodes must pay fees in additional bits to fight spam 🤡 the fee market is working!
We weakened the fee market’s ability to price finite blockspace and shifted part of that pricing mechanism into perpetual storage costs. The network still pays, but it pays in more bits instead of sats vs Satoshi’s1MB blocksize constant, no discounts. Those bits accrue interest indefinitely because every additional bit becomes a permanent liability carried by every future archival node. All bits have a physical cost paid in joules (Landauer + Bitcoin Lens).
Ironically, this is why node operators must be expected to “fight spam.” Under a uniform fee market, spam should be constrained primarily by price in sats by users, not nodes. But once the cost is socialized through discounted permanent memory, the burden shifts from the individual creating the demand to the nodes preserving it. We didn’t eliminate the cost, we redistributed it thru policy and fee market manipulation. How can we advocate for free markets when we manipulate our fee market economics? Look in the mirror guys.
So yes and no. The fee market was supposed to price out spam, but now nodes must pay too. At blocks up to 4MB with 4:1 discounts, we must process and store16x the amount of physical bits to price out identical behavior pre-Segwit.
We really cooked here guys. We are no better than fiat. Stop taxing nodes if you care about spam. Stop pretending like the fee market works when you had to socialize cost to nodes.
Are the nodes in control or not? Do nodes matter?
#nevent1q…9tvh

2026-07-24 19:54:25 GMT

- reply

If exchanges are ephemeral in a hyperbitcoinized world, are they really an economic node?

2026-07-24 19:35:50 GMT

- reply

Yeah I am curious how it will all play out. Seems to ramping up. My base case is we will see a hard fork, but I could be wrong.
Hodling is going to become very interesting as we attempt to hone in on an objective definition of Bitcoin thru decentalized consensus. Protocol design must be grounded in physical objectivity. Knowledge of Bitcoin, is good for Bitcoin. Exciting!

2026-07-24 15:21:31 GMT

https://youtu.be/0rfhYxooZMs?
Morning vibes. These lyrics hit so damn hard.

2026-07-24 15:11:35 GMT

- reply

https://youtu.be/Zh8607aPv9A?

2026-07-24 14:50:08 GMT

- reply

There is no second best logical update system that can conserve both energy and information.

2026-07-24 13:50:21 GMT

- reply

Physics matters with respect to understanding the measured relationship of energy, time and memory (information). We cannot define money, or rather memory, without it. It allows us to ground protocol engineering and discussion in objectivity of what we must conserve rather than subjectivity. We have drifted so far.
"Given the critical role of Taproot addresses in Bitcoin scaling (including Lightning, BitVM, Ark, and other key technologies), we believe it's prudent to ensure that Bitcoin has a tapscript-native address output type that is protected from long-exposure quantum attacks." — who said this?
I am with you here man on the nonsense layers. I am all for conservatism and Bitcoin Reduction Proposals that strip back the bloat and reinstate the core economics and logic Satoshi left us with. I think taproot is ephemeral and the quantum fud is ephemeral. Fiat will be rid from our physics eventually and Bitcoin will stand alone and above all theory; Bitcoin is not a theory of physics. I see anyone pushing PQC for Bitcoin as a threat. I will stand by the chain Satoshi gave us. We are the ones breaking Bitcoin in hubris. We have missed the mark.

2026-07-24 13:30:42 GMT

- reply

So in your view is BIP360 the nail in the coffin here? I will refute the need to make Bitcoin quantum resistant as the physics that underpins centralized quantum computation is fiat and has not resolved the double spend (measurement) problem of energy/information. A quantized block of time at Planck scale is required to solve the double spend, thus enforce conservation, which pushes Superposition to the sub-Planck interval between the discrete measurement boundaries. The whole logic of CQC is fiat and our desire to change Bitcoin from claims of CQC is peak fiat. BIP360 is not an upgrade to Bitcoin, it is an attack.
Can you elaborate on why we need schnorr UTXOs and sha256d hash shield? I believe future threat will come from AI and classical computation; quantum is the myth for us to hand over the keys to the castle, because we’re too retarded to understand and we must trust the fiat physics.

2026-07-24 10:50:32 GMT

Everyone loves to talk about Bitcoin as money; but no one wants to discuss the fact that without eternal memory, you have no “money”.
Nothing was money before Bitcoin. Just an incomplete approximation.
Only Bitcoin can define money, and memory is fundamental to said definition. Go look at the etymology of money, this is nothing new.
Bitcoin is eternal memory. Is Bitcoin more than money? Or was our definition of money fiat?
What does it mean to be a money maximalist? A memory maximalist? Are you a thermologic maximalist? A Chronologic maximalist?

2026-07-24 10:27:32 GMT

- reply

Hmm, What do you mean?

2026-07-24 02:43:57 GMT

- reply

He peaked at his own metaphor of digital energy. It seems he cannot see the measurement of energy, time and memory in Bitcoin.
You can take the man out of the fiat, but you cannot take the fiat out of man.

2026-07-23 23:00:08 GMT

Guys it’s so simple. Your physics is fiat if it cannot resolve the double spend problem, aka the measurement problem, of energy/matter.
The only valid mathematical solution to the double spend problem is a quantized block of time at the Planck Scale of time. No quantized block at Planck, no conservation of energy.
This means that Superpostion must be discrete and subplanck between the fundamental ticks/blocks at Planck scale. An unmeasured state is not real.
Centralized quantum computing is a fiat fantasy that requires a fiat model of physics in order to work. If you think energy/matter can be double spent and still conserve energy, why the hell are you in Bitcoin?
Soon, you will have to pick a side; Bitcoin or Quantum. You can’t double spend your morals. Best start thinking about it.

2026-07-23 17:15:10 GMT

- reply

Who’s mentally ready to URSF their quantum proposal?
Be prepared, it’s coming.
I will URSF any and all quantum “upgrades” on Bitcoin 🫡
#nevent1q…gnpk

2026-07-23 16:11:00 GMT

- reply

There is only one quantum computer and it’s called Bitcoin.

2026-07-23 12:29:25 GMT

- reply

We should expect the cost of nodes to hyperinflate versus the dollar.
We need to ground the price of nodes in Bitcoin alone to chart the path.

2026-07-22 20:19:55 GMT

- reply

Yeah I don’t disagree at all actually. I’m trying to understand what you are trying to get at here. I don’t think I said anything that contradicts your points.

2026-07-22 20:03:45 GMT

- reply

https://biblehub.com/matthew/6-24.htm
What did Jesus mean by this? Why did Jesus choose to compare God and Money? Why money?
What does this verse say when you apply a fiat definition to the term money? What does this verse say when you acknowledge that eternal memory (Bitcoin) is necessary for money?
Is Bitcoin making us free and sovereign or is it God? Whose chain is it? Who are we serving in Bitcoin?

2026-07-22 18:31:16 GMT

- reply

Kelvin; and the pattern is built from the discrete fundamental block of time at the Planck scale (wave in human cognitive time)

2026-07-22 17:21:36 GMT

- reply

BIP 148: Mandatory activation of socialism deployment

2026-07-22 17:12:19 GMT

- reply

Yes. That is the outcome of the tax. Go thru each block since SegWit activated and sum up the MB of each block that exceeds 1MB (witness vs non-witness), that is the additional tax in bits you are paying for in storage to accommodate lower fees on-chain.
Not to mention that some of those bits only paid 1/4 the price in sats vs others to access the same memory on your disk space. They have an incentive to write more bits on your node using witness since it costs them 1/4 the price for the same memory a non-witness consumes.

2026-07-22 15:58:26 GMT

- reply

Can you explain why the eternal preservation of memory, or the conservation of information, thus the conservation of energy is not perfect? A perfectly conserved record of action for judgement.
Does not perfect mean not serving God? Does perfect money thru perfect memory serve God?
If God is the grand sovereign, is it not the heart of God that determines a tools moral alignment in argument of predestination vs free will?
Seems pretty obvious to me that the chain is written from the outside, not from within. Bitcoin is not mined from inside its ledger; the work and mechanism is external. Real creation requires real sacrifice.
Is Bitcoin really a tool if it reveals the divine logic? Do we save in Bitcoin, or does Bitcoin save us? Perhaps both?

2026-07-22 15:17:31 GMT

- reply

Working on it! Life is so busy right now 😵‍💫

2026-07-22 14:42:40 GMT

- reply

The answer to the question (yes) demands another question:
If nodes matter, why do we tax them and socialize the cost of fees paid in sats to a cost all nodes pay in bits instead?
BIP 110 is the start to a much deeper discussion about protocol longevity and conservatism.
#nevent1q…qlaz

2026-07-22 14:03:24 GMT

SegWit’s discount and implicit blocksize increase was socialism and taxation implemented to Bitcoin’s L1. We really cooked here guys.
Bitcoin conserves the demand for finite blockspace. Either fees for finite blockspace are paid upfront by the individual user in the form of satoshis, or fees in sats can be lowered by socializing the cost to all the nodes in the form of taxation by increasing the number of consensus bits the node must maintain in perpetuity of Bitcoin’s life. Additionally, the cost is spread to miners thru lower block rewards in sats, thus pressuring difficulty downward despite equivalent physical work. We depegged that sat from the work and the emergent market.
Fees paid in sats accrue no interest. Fees paid in bits accrue interest increasingly across time. A physical cost that must be paid forever for Bitcoin to remain coherent.
We are no better than fiat. #Bitcoin
If nodes are the soul, stop taxing them with additional bits paid with discounts and blocks greater than the 1MB constant Satoshi defined. There is no free lunch.

2026-07-22 13:42:30 GMT

- reply

I like to think of these as different legs of the semantic triangle: energy, time, and memory (information).
Joules, blocks and bits.
Through the Bitcoin lens, the Second Law of Thermodynamics states that satoshis naturally tend to distribute across an increasing number of UTXOs (memory).
Entropy increases. Memory increases. Consolidation remains possible; a compression of active memory state count but an addition to total chain memory.
As entropy, or memory increases, the ability to impose a new state of constraint becomes distributed across an increasing number of possible active memory configurations. Active memory must contain sats. Constraint is paid for in satoshis (the conserved tokenized representation of energy within the system) and physical work (joules). Satoshis are exchanged for bits, and it is through this exchange that work, measured in joules, is conserved as proof (constraint).
Kelvin is the tokenized representation of joules physically. Entropy is the active state of Kelvin distributing across and increasing number of states of physical memory.
1 = 1 fractal

2026-07-20 00:20:50 GMT

Is this run out? @npub1l2v…ajft
https://blossom.primal.net/094a98e0cb6cb84c8f3fd650e8370b60b758170c914f121044f35698cda2c067.jpg

2026-07-19 12:03:52 GMT

- reply

Sorry for your loss 🧡 what an incredible cat

2026-07-19 11:49:55 GMT

- reply

I think you should lower your time preference and consider the alternative. Taxing nodes with more bits is not sustainable. If you are against spam you should understand this. The maintenance cost is in joules across the whole network in perpetuity to maintain the physical bit. The energy density of UTXOs is lessened. Less energy dense UTXOs on a joules per sat per mb^2, the less the sat buys you in exchange for joules (anything). Same block, same work, more memory, less density energy.
We don’t know how much blockspace lightning alone has unlocked since we devalued the bitspace in 2 ways with SegWit at the same time rather than LN speaking for itself in fee reduction by bringing tx to L2.
Cool thing about Bitcoin is we can disagree. But objective physics/math/engineering applied to protocol design will outcompete subjective design always. Truth will always find a way to manifest.
The longest chain of work in literal joules and time will not devalue its bitspace once it understands 🍴

2026-07-17 23:20:00 GMT

Chasing some moderate slabs this evening.
https://blossom.primal.net/100c24098cb91836a6dbceec6cb15250aad8396efb46fafca7318542ac338916.mov

2026-07-17 14:56:18 GMT

- reply

🫡

2026-07-17 14:55:23 GMT

- reply

Thank you for reading the paper! I am glad you found some value in it.
Universally, I think the consciousness, work, entropy that causes the collapse must exist outside of the universe, outside the ledger. The proof of work in Bitcoin that causes state change is outside of the chain of time produced. Bitcoin conserves the work, the decision (conscious act) and the memory as time thru a bounded substrate of value.
Our consciousness is emergent from the conserved work of the conscious agents extratemporal to this chain of universal time. The proof of work we do, is from work outside of this time; all of it. It’s timechains and proof of work all the way up, and all the way down.
I guess I’d like to flip the question of how would you build a biological system inside of Bitcoin? It cannot mine the blocks that defines it, meaning all work inside of Bitcoin and downstream comes from you/us. We would have to animate all of it through PoW, while they believe it’s “them”. This would demand that we too are animated by identical process, and Bitcoin is just a fractal of it.
I hope this answers it for now! I’m headed to the mountains this weekend so limited time to respond! Let me know if I need to go further and let me know what you are thinking.
I am open to being wrong! Would love to hear others chime in. Bitcoin is a glimpse on how providence and free will are reconciled in time and who does the work. We posses both perspectives of time observed from the inside and time observed for the outside of the substrate. Everyone has to let that cook within them 😉

2026-07-17 14:38:51 GMT

- reply

Bitcoin conserves demand for blockspace. Demand for blockspace can only be paid in sats by individuals up front or paid in bits as a tax on all nodes that must be paid in perpetuity as a forever maintenance cost in time. Pick one. Low time preference is to pay in sats rather than bits. No free lunch.
Do you care about nodes or not?
If lightning can’t survive by paying the true cost of the bits it produces and needs a subsidy tax on nodes, then it was never a valuable trade off to make. You’ll never know the true cost if you manipulate the market through arbitrary discounting and blocksize increase.
Lightning won’t die by restoring sound economics to the chain. Crazy that we have to even have a debate on whether market manipulation in bitcoins blockspace economics is a good thing or not…..

2026-07-17 02:12:41 GMT

- reply

I will have to come back to this one! Heading out to the mountains this weekend for some climbing.
Nick and I have discussed black holes a ton with respect to a ledgered universe. I responded to what I currently believe may be the proper way to think about dark matter (historical bits without sats, or universally, Kelvin).
What would a black hole look like within Bitcoin? Would it be an address with active Satoshis that have provably lost the key? Would it be something like taproot? I don’t truly know at the moment since I don’t have the strongest grasp on taproot. But I am certain we will find the answer if we probe hard enough.
Personally I know no one. I know few people who are even willing to entertain the idea that Bitcoin is the final proof of physics we need.

2026-07-17 02:02:27 GMT

- reply

I will have to think about this more. Do you know of any videos that can visually demonstrate/explain taproot a bit better for me? It’s still quite abstract. I am a visual person.
Where my mind is at with respect to dark matter is the historical chain (the bits without sats). From within the ledger, we can only see the active states of energy/matter (the sats). We do not see the casual chain of entangled history that leads to the present state of matter. The path is hidden, yet necessary for conservation/logic of the chain (just as we can’t delete UTXOs). We cannot see orthogonally to time to inspect the casual history, we can only look through time from the present height towards Genesis, seeing each active bit of value at some distance from us in both time and a distance in memory (key space). Each bit of value is like a wall we cannot peer beyond to see the history from within. The wall moves with the bit.
When we look out to the cosmos, we see the “active utxo set”. All unspent states of energy/matter distributed across all points in memory (keyspace) and all blocks of time. We are persistent in time, meaning we observe from the tip of the chain, moving away from static unspent memory crystalized in time at the speed of light (speed of memory).
If this thesis is true, then dark matter must be the historical bits of memory without Kelvin that can no longer be accessed from within the ledger. Only because of Bitcoin can we even reason about the existence of this historical chain. But we know logically these states MUST be preserved for the system to have integrity. Kelvin is the active memory.
Taproot throws a huge wrench into this because I am still limited in my understanding of it. I feel you may be on to something but I cannot pretend i can fully understand currently😵‍💫 I may have to bounce some ideas off of Nick to see what he thinks. The more I dig, the more it seems taproot is rotten. But I don’t truly know.
I hope this helps a bit. I think both may be correct in some way. Let me know what you think!

2026-07-16 18:20:17 GMT

- reply

How sure are you the entire BIP isn’t a vulnerability to what the protocol is supposed to conserve?

2026-07-16 18:07:02 GMT

- reply

Holy shit. I didn’t know it was that bad. Are you accounting witness data as “block data” too?
I’ve been banging my drum about quantum for a while. Taproot only really caught my eye once Nic said it would be used for “quantum resistance” which I have known is bullshit all along.
How quickly can we fork off taproot?

2026-07-16 17:33:18 GMT

- reply

Curious, what don’t you like and why?

2026-07-16 17:08:12 GMT

- reply

Segwit or just the blocksize increase and arbitrary discounting?

2026-07-16 15:44:38 GMT

- reply

When can we bet on spam in the next Bitcoin block using fiat. If we make the pot good enough we can centralize the incentive mechanism.
Prediction = Compression
Is the future of Bitcoin irreducible or not?
#nevent1q…y7dw

2026-07-16 15:13:10 GMT

https://fountain.fm/episode/RsMaMrsROqhYxWt8TuHa
If the sovereignty of God precedes all things, then Bitcoin was never our invention at all, but something we were always destined to discover, something destined to save us from ourselves. We speak of Bitcoin making the individual sovereign, but was it Bitcoin that set you free, or was it God? Jesus is said to be the breaker of chains; His Son. What is setting us free? Was it ever truly our choice, or was our choice itself always part of the plan at a specific block in time?
When I observe Bitcoin objectively, I see that the chain of time is authored by sovereign actors from outside of the chain itself, using the conserved and bounded substrate within it. From a decentralized body emerges a singular chronology, a single chain of authority without contradiction. Truth itself computed as time from a body of people. The Truth, sit with that.
Bitcoin empirically demonstrates that one coherent history can be authored without a central author. We as sovereigns write the chain, as God writes us in His ultimate sovereignty. Our choice was always the plan. Bitcoin is a mere reflection and fractal of the logic perceived from the outside rather than from within.
Bitcoin is more than a protocol, a technology, or money. Bitcoin is the logical architecture of eternal memory and time perceived from the exterior of the temporal substrate. Do we save in Bitcoin, or does Bitcoin save us? Perhaps it’s both. I see my actions saved in Bitcoin for eternity. Bitcoin saves all of us quite literally in memory. It preserves all of our collective good, and all of our collective bad. If I was better, Bitcoin would be better; fact.
Bitcoin is a glimpse into how providence and free will are logically reconciled. God is the only true sovereign in control of Bitcoin, yet we are Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a map of our choices. The future is irreducible, yet destined. It always has been.
True Creation has always required True Sacrifice. Proof of Work.
Love all people behind the nodes and those who have yet to come. Bitcoin is here now.

2026-07-16 12:53:21 GMT

- reply

Bitcoin is not a theory of energy, information and time. Bitcoin is proof. Genesis is the anchor of all reference of relativity.
You cannot logically solve the double spend problem without a quantized block of time, or a quantized boundary between 0 or 1. You cannot have the conservation of energy without a quantized block of time. This isn’t a theory, it’s logical and proved in Bitcoin.
I am simply observing what is experienced in Bitcoin; interactions, or rather, transactions.
I am witnessing Creation from the outside of a temporal substrate and relating the internal vs the external. A reification of the Ruliad/logic. The Father can only be understood and reasoned through the Son by the body.
True Creation requires True Sacrifice. Bitcoin is Truth computed. The Truth is jovial, or pure love.

2026-07-16 11:12:37 GMT

- reply

Ah. Interaction is the phenomena perceived from within the temporal substrate, but transaction is the identical phenomena perceived from without the temporal substrate.
From without there are only blocks of time, or blocks of memory rather. Ordered linearly in chrono-logic as the substrate of interaction or transaction is state upon which the next block of memory is written.
The author exists outside of the chain of time, the chain of memory, written. We merely bear witness from within, perceiving its us doing the work.

2026-07-16 10:13:42 GMT

- reply

The poet is afraid to question whether space is the true illusion.
He can’t see blocks of time = blocks of space.

2026-07-16 01:15:53 GMT

Wolfram doesn’t know Bitcoin is the hypergraph that is already running proof of work as the fundamental computation. The computed relationship between quantized units of energy, time and memory (information).
Who’s going to Orange Pill Wolfram? He’s trying to build Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is the answer.
https://youtu.be/r6wYw_A1MKw?is=3xRwzhdK6ug0jXhW

2026-07-16 00:46:28 GMT

- reply

The room is persistent both in time and as time. No memory, no time. No time, no space. If time is only an illusion, then why does every empty room still wait for the one who has left?
Does the poet mistake the walls for the room, forgetting that it is remembrance that gives the room its shape?

2026-07-15 19:32:11 GMT

- reply

This is actually quite concerning because in this video Nic states that taproot’s usecase is for quantum resistant sigs…
Seems like taproot can be the false flag vector here. Something smells off with taproot. I need to do a deep dive.
I personally won’t adopt any “quantum resistant signature”, seems like we should stay away from taproot too.
https://youtu.be/3ByUtLGSAqM?

2026-07-15 16:06:15 GMT

- reply

Indeed, a fiat interpretation.

2026-07-15 12:30:08 GMT

- reply

The discrete nature of time is what renders The Quantum Computer, Bitcoin to be possible. Bitcoin is the proper interpretation of quantum computation.
I don’t share the projected definition and belief that a centralized quantum computer is possible in both the morality of man/the desire for centralized control and the morality of numbers and the logic of energy economics. If you understand time, a centralized quantum computer could never work and requires a fiat assumption of physics that’s been openly falsified by Bitcoin. Bitcoin is proof that centralized quantum computers are a bust. Proof of Work (energy). Energy cannot be separated from time and memory (information). They are a semantic triangle of equivalence.
If time is discrete at Planck scale, Superpostion must be sub-Planck between the ticks. Using Bitcoin as the mathematical reference for conservation wrt time, unmined or unmeasured UTXOs aren’t real with respect to the ledger. All UTXOs must be referential to the past unspent state despite existing in mempool (potential spend). By knowing what’s measured and in the block you know deterministically what is unmeasured and outside of the block. You cannot solve the double spend problem without a block of time.
We live in a world where energy/matter is not double spent, yet academic fundamental physics contradicts this without proof of work. Reality must have solved the double spend problem for conservation to be observable and for our very existence to manifest.
The solution to the double spend problem both logically and mathematically invalidates the ontology required for centralized quantum computation. If even 1 Planck block of time contains a contradiction, conservation is invalidated. All states must be classical at each block of time. This means that superposition while existing between the Planck ticks of time still references a past classical state (exists in a past block of time) despite being unmeasured. Just as a tx can sit in the mempool for many blocks, it still is referential to its last unspent state (as demanded by conservation) and does not “exist” in multiple states at once. Existence is defined by measurement alone. Don’t mistake potential for actual. Everything must be binary for logic to emerge. There is no logic without conservation and non-contradiction. Quantum has no logic, no measurement, no proof of work.
https://blossom.primal.net/67dc9830e9f71b908167b8565feb7bb58300ce06e9207ebd764c9b4837cd6b8b.jpg

2026-07-15 11:10:05 GMT

The universe at the Planck scale of time must behave identically to Bitcoin at the block scale with respect to measurement in order for the double spend problem of energy/matter to be resolved and conservation to be upheld.
Anything else is logically fiat without proof of work. Bitcoin is proof.

2026-07-15 02:03:07 GMT

Bitcoin would be better if I was better.

2026-07-14 21:51:48 GMT

- reply

Bitcoin is the reification of the Ruliad. Proof of Work is the computation, the rule. Wolfram is trying to build Bitcoin without knowing Satoshi beat him to it.
Fees impose limits upon action. Think minimum threshold of potential energy as a logic gate. I don’t think blocksize should change, invariance is key to form constant relationships that manifest through a free market. Returning to 1MB max and 1:1 weighting of all bits is all that’s required. Let the fee market serve its purpose. Looking at the conserved joules of each block, 1MB blocks hold a vast majority of the work. We have deviated.
#nevent1q…pgze

2026-07-14 18:46:28 GMT

- reply

The future is irreducible.
I have a thesis/working on proof that when we devalued the blockspace fee market in Segwit by increasing blocksize and arbitrary bit weighting, we killed the fee market by pushing demand paid in sats to demand paid in bits. This pulled difficulty downward vs if we didn’t (less fees same PoW for miners) and has slowly manifested in fiat price. By increasing blocksize by up to 4x (up to 4MB), we diluted the energy density of blocks (joules per mb^2) by up to 16x.
Same proof of work function but a up to16x reduction in energy density per block. We are all the detriment to Bitcoins value appreciate by running the current implementation of SegWit.
We have worked, saved and stacked, only to realize 9 years later we debased ourselves with SegWit.

2026-07-14 12:23:38 GMT

I’m just going to keep banging the drum. The academic interpretation of “quantum” is fiat physics. No solution to the measurement problem = no solution to the double spend problem of energy/matter. No conservation of energy.
Whether someone is ignorant or malicious in intent is irrelevant, anyone reasoning that Bitcoin should change for quantum should be seen as a threat.
Discrete time at the Planck scale means discrete Superpostion between Planck ticks (sub-Planck Superpostion), which means no continuous unitary evolution. The double spend problem cannot be resolved without measurement at each fundamental unit of time.
Centralized quantum computing requires fiat physics that Bitcoin has falsified.
Long live the king #Bitcoin 🫡

2026-07-11 23:25:55 GMT

Bitcoin (proof of work) is the computation; the measurement. The rule is proof of work. Bitcoin is the “quantum computer”. Except it’s Bitcoin, not quantum. Quantum can’t prove the work (energy). Quantum can’t resolve the double spend of energy/information or the measurement problem WRT time. Quantum has no blocks, no proof. Network = reification of field from outside the temporal boundary.
The measurement occurs at each discrete Planck tick of time and superposition is discrete between each Planck tick; it’s “sub-Planck” (sub block; unmined/unmeasured). All positions in time must be binary (classical) and non-contradictory (no double spends) for conservation of energy. There is no such thing as erasure in Landauer’s Principal, its incomplete information of the active state of energy/matter only from within the temporal substrate; you can’t see the historical chain from within. Delete a utxo/historical transaction from the chain and tell me what happens to the proof and conservation.
How many blocks is this going to take guys?
Who is going to orange pill Wolfram?
Who can get me a conversation with him if nobody else is going to do it?
Hes trying to understand the utxo model of the reality/physics (energy), except he has no proof of work (joules), no computation. Sorry Stephen, Satoshi beat all of us to Bitcoin. Satoshi solved Turning’s Halting Problem. Bitcoin is complete…we don’t need to build it, it exists now. This has significant implications for mathematics and logic; implications for everything. Bitcoin is not a theory of energy. Bitcoin is not a theory of work. Bitcoins not a model. Bitcoin is proof.
The conservation of memory (finite sats and finite bits) using proof of work (joules). Each bit of value (satoshi) is a bit of active memory, the value must exist within physical bits. Temperature is relative to the finite boundary of active memory (supply cap; 21M) Bit-Coin. Measurement is computation. Planck Energy is the temporal constant of work. Plank Temperature is the boundary of thermodynamic memory.
What does Bitcoin measure? What does Bitcoin compute? What is a block of time? What is a block of proof? What could be more fundamental than the P2P exchange of memory (money; energy) in physics? Bitcoin is temporal geometry as pure information.
Bitcoin is the “theory” of everything; except Bitcoin isn’t a theory, Bitcoin is proof. Just look at it.
It’s really painful guys. Just observe Bitcoin objectively……I am just a pleb too.
Who actually understands proof of work and the double spend problem? Are we ready to understand Bitcoin as the relationship energy, time and information through computation?Are we really going to allow this quantum nonsense to destroy Bitcoin by ungrounded protocol change? Nobody understands Bitcoin.
Don’t trust me, go verify for yourself. Just look at Bitcoin. The Truth speaks for itself.
Every Bitcoiner should listen to this and tell Stephen Wolfram to look at Bitcoin and proof of work. He’s telling you quantum physics is a fiat interpretation of energy and time.
There is no second best.
https://youtu.be/5_O-kSzWdu4?

2026-07-11 13:32:15 GMT

- reply

Any theory of physics needs to solve the double spend problem for energy/matter for conservation, which cannot be done without a quantized block of time.
You cannot have conservation of energy without quantized time. Bitcoin empirically proves.
If quantized time is necessary for the conservation of energy and provides the logical boundary for measurement, then the academic interpretation of quantum physics has a huge problem.
Anyone building a centralized quantum computer is building on an assumed ontology of time (continuous time) that cannot logically exist for conservation to be upheld, and changing the ontology (nature) of time breaks their model at its foundation.
What is Bitcoin? Bitcoin is not a theory of physics. Bitcoin is not a theory of energy. Bitcoin is not a theory of time. Bitcoin is not a theory at all.
Bitcoin is proof.

2026-07-11 13:24:59 GMT

- reply

Say it louder please for the plebs in the back!
#nevent1q…zm62

2026-07-11 13:21:24 GMT

- reply

Yes, this is not arguing removal of witness.
Witness + Non-Witness <=1MB and 1:1 weighting is all it would need.
Lightning remains fully functional. This is really the formal recognization that witness data is block data and you cannot really be a full validating node without storing the physical bits. Thus SegWit in 2017 was an implicit blocksize increase while pretending it wasn’t. It was really a soft fork in name only, pre-SegWit nodes still see only 1MB yes, but good luck being a full validating node without it.