Jenniferplusplus

trans lesbian
staff software engineer
devops, reliability, resilience, sociotechnical systems
also, that gay shit

Was [@jenniferplusplus](https://tech.lgbt/@jenniferplusplus )

Web: https://jenniferplusplus.com
Fedi App: http://letterbookhq.com
Fedi Sandbox: https://github.com/Letterbook/Sandcastles
Pronouns: she/her

Public Key

npub1a5gx0hhdz3pgdatvsel8gs6wuaup7jae3afuy8f66zrqpyvuy8hsuyax95

NIP-05 Address

[email protected]

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsw6yr8mmk3gs5x74kgvln5gd8ww7qlfwuc757zr5adppsqjxwzrmcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds52t4r0

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1a5gx0hhdz3pgdatvsel8gs6wuaup7jae3afuy8f66zrqpyvuy8hsuyax95

Show more details

Last Notes

2024-06-21 21:35:29

- reply

This one weird trick to stand out from the crowd and build a reliable readership

2024-06-12 03:35:18

- reply

American police maim and kill people. They have actual tanks, and will jump at any chance to use them. They will destroy your life for sitting peacefully in a public space.
So, first, if you want American popular protest to be more effective, stop bitching about how divisive it is to "defund the police"
Second, if you think Americans aren't protesting, that is a you problem

2024-06-12 03:31:08

France: *organized protest in the street*
Some dipshit: why can't America be more like France?
America, literally the day before:
https://neuromatch.social/@jonny/112597971318729952

2024-06-08 03:17:46

- reply

there's a lot of assumptions that the domain provides a sort of namespace. Like, it would be pretty hard to share the webfinger path, or nodeinfo.

2024-06-07 22:08:56

protip: billionaires do not need you to defend them. They are not worthy of your support. And if for some reason they do need you to defend them, they should be paying you for that service.

2024-06-07 19:30:21

You know what? My pet peeve is referring to the "tech industry" as though that's a singular thing that makes some kind of sense to talk about. It's not. There's no such thing. It's at least 4 things.
1. Telecomunications (mostly ISPs)
2. IT professional services (design/development agencies, SaaS companies, and clouds)
3. Surveillance (they call themselves ad tech)
4. Semiconductor manufacturing
Sometimes entertainment gets mixed in, but that's its own thing

2024-05-22 23:50:51

Do you ever just look at big tech, and think wow, this trajectory looks exactly like big oil, big tobacco, big automotive, and so on?

2024-05-17 07:52:15

- reply

Fedbox does, and they use the Replies collection for it.
https://metalhead.club/@mariusor/111716353263015161
Letterbook will. I'm flexible as to how, but my current plan is to duplicate the OP's replies collection into the context.
cc @npub1xze…wwdj

2024-05-16 18:29:07

- reply

These things are all fixable problems, it "just" takes coordination between a few dozen part time volunteer implementers 😭
I tell myself I'm going to just do it unilaterally and then help everyone else catch up. I'm not sure if I'm lying to myself or not.

2024-05-16 17:53:08

- reply

yes.
But I also want state convergence. No matter what, different hosts are going to wind up with different views of the state of the graph. Why are there no mechanisms to detect that and enable convergence?

2024-05-14 21:32:52

FYI: you do not, ever, gotta hand it to 'em, if they're fascists. If the worst person you know made a great point, they're still the worst person you know and you need to stop letting them shape the way you think.

2024-05-11 19:26:40

- reply

It seems like they would be pretty easy to distinguish heuristically. A Question that bundles in multiple Answers is a poll. A Question that doesn't, or that links to an Answer, is a Q&A.
Although my preference would be for a, @/context entry that clarifies the semantics

2024-05-08 22:55:48

- reply

Unions and regulation were always the compromise. Pitchforks and guillotines should be on the table again when the compromise is broken.

2024-04-30 22:11:08

Reminder not to eat the rich.
The rich are apex predators, and they accumulate high concentrations of environmental toxins.
Instead, you should compost the rich

2024-04-29 17:44:04

- reply

Extremely not comprehensive list of ActivityPub microblogging projects you could contribute to, instead of forking mastodon
https://github.com/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial
https://github.com/misskey-dev/misskey
https://github.com/bonfire-networks/bonfire-app
https://github.com/go-ap/fedbox
https://akkoma.dev/AkkomaGang/akkoma
https://iceshrimp.dev/iceshrimp/Iceshrimp.NET
https://github.com/Letterbook/Letterbook

2024-04-29 17:21:41

- reply

If in-place upgrades aren't the goal, then just build something new. Or contribute to one of the various preexisting projects. Don't adopt mastodon's tech debt for no reason. It's not worth it.
I know I'm eager to have more help, if existing projects suddenly sound better.

2024-04-29 17:19:23

I don't know who needs to hear this, but I'm getting tired just thinking about the testing path you would need to follow in order to fork mastodon and keep it as an in-place upgrade from baseline.
1. stand up a baseline mastodon instance
2. federate with some peers
3. fill it with realistic data
4. migrate to the fork
5. test the fork
6. test federation
7. repeat across several combinations of mastodon base versions and other fedi servers
8. rapidly, during development

2024-04-18 18:31:53

Wow, tech oligarchs are really getting tired of our* shit**, huh?
We have so much power. We would win that fight every time, almost immediately, if we can just stop pretending we're somehow above being merely labor.
*software developers, defined broadly
**expecting to have a say in the terms and conditions of our work

2024-04-05 16:11:20

Are we still talking about supporting open source maintainers? I hope so, because I wrote about a more holistic solution than giving everyone a patreon or whatever.
https://jenniferplusplus.com/the-free-software-commons/

2024-03-30 22:59:57

- reply

social software. Empowering software. Equitable software. Community software. Public software. Something in that space.
As a first step, we talk about governance with the same energy we have been talking about licenses.

2024-03-30 21:52:00

Free™ Software™ was never sufficient. It always needed to be a step on a larger path, and maybe this weekend's news with xz illustrates some portion of why that is, and also where the rest of the path lies.

2024-03-27 16:39:22

- reply

Hey, question: If the "phenomenon" was due to the zero interest rate, which is the same for everyone, why don't we see the same patterns in other sectors?

2024-03-27 16:29:40

Cannot tell you how much I hate the word zirp. Also the concept. Also the willful blindness to the nature of power and capital that it requires to be satisfied with "zirp" as an answer to questions about why venture capital backed firms act the way they do

2024-03-23 16:26:20

- reply

I keep saying exactly this is going to happen, and exactly this keeps happening.