bitcoiner in the Madisonian mold. developer on multisig @ unchained, working on lightning auth with LSATs. Blocked on twitter
Public Key
npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 Profile Code
nprofile1qqs2ywhz5su8plusgc4qlj6rfkueux8y8x45uuave0e5ql8wumhuc6gpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds2cyt0n
Show more details
Published at
2023-03-06T20:09:06Z Event JSON
{
"id": "9ac49fb0ea38ad7c4d2bd10d99ef2f95ecbba7861d0ff33807567e8e953a94ff" ,
"pubkey": "a23ae2a43870ff90462a0fcb434db99e18e439ab4e73accbf3407ceee6efcc69" ,
"created_at": 1678133346 ,
"kind": 0 ,
"tags": [],
"content": "{\"npub\":\"npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670\",\"name\":\"buck\",\"lud06\":\"lnurl1dp68gurn8ghj7um5v93kketj9ehx2amn9uh8wetvdskkkmn0wahz7mrww4excup0vf6kx6c5g4ef5\",\"about\":\"bitcoiner in the Madisonian mold. developer on multisig @ unchained, working on lightning auth with LSATs. Blocked on twitter\",\"lud16\":\"[email protected] \",\"picture\":\"https://void.cat/d/3nEJK42K1WoLQC5YBjR6Ae\",\"display_name\":\"buck\",\"created_at\":1674440894,\"nip05\":\"[email protected] \"}" ,
"sig": "39936e7906b94760ba3b014c27fdcf7956df300597a2d5b83439b91a8cd69fcff9a86fc649832216e07cabbaf94ad583760d339b91adb01599a5438a1f27cd01"
}
Last Notes npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Highlighter is the killer app for me personally to be more active on nostr npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck I’ve been on for a while but mostly as a lurker 😅 npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Indeed Buck is! npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Buck is also on nostr 😁. Looking forward to the new year chat! #note1zhx…p0dy npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Are there any relay implementations that have NIP-44 support? The NIP04 standard says it's been deprecated in favor of 44 but there don't seem to be any relays that support the favored one. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck He is the psyop manifest npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck If you're in Austin TX this week for SXSW or the Bitcoin Takeover, join us at the Bitcoin Commons this Thursday for Austin Bitdevs! npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck It could be but BIPs are a lot of work, more political than technical and it doesn’t need a BIP to work. Just broader understanding and adoption. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck That’s what’s important about having a good domain model- it makes it easier to reason about code paths that should already be available to you. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck The protocol for blinded xpubs is actually pretty straightforward and easily done today (higher risk of losing funds though if you don’t know what you’re doing). npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck fun fact: looks like npm utilizes 402 status codes in responses if you try and publish to a private package! npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Ok, so I wasn’t the only person in the world that saw and recognized @npub1sg6…f63m wearing a satoshi shirt. #note1fsd…arkk npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Unless I’m missing something, you can’t just “allow” sign events with the key offline. Maybe there’s some delegation protocol, but you need access to the nsec to sign every message. Signing can’t happen without access to the private key. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Every message you send in nostr is signed with a private key. I’m assuming you’re not signing that much with your bitcoin seed. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Nice. I also like the somewhat related concepts of Veblen goods and shibboleths. Both hard to acquire signals that you are part of a group (the former through cost and latter through language, originally literally unable to pronounce a word). npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Good walk-thru as well of how we as a community that are custodians of an open, decentralized, and immensely valuable protocol need to have reasonable expectations. Lightning didn’t fix all of bitcoin’s problems, but it also was necessary to get the MVP out, in no small part b/c deploying proof of concept is how we learn. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Yeah and honestly if it hold for too long that basically means bitcoin has failed since the majority of people still have zero familiarity with it still and those are the ones that still need to be onboarded for it to be worth it. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck I really like this heuristic for evaluating bitcoin upgrades by Erik Aronesty from the mailing list: npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Wen @npub1mut…23vg integration carman? npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Question was my comparison to stacker news so makes sense. Nice thing about nostr is you don’t have to use the custodial options. Problem with nostr is the complexity and “analysis paralysis” that comes from too much choice. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Good to hear. I think the ecosystem needs to be more open to centralization to address scaling. The key to the benefits (like bitcoin) is right to exit and open competition. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Case in point, I setup payments in nostr for my account with stacker news npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Not quite. There are more steps to getting setup in a nostr ecosystem where you can get paid than it is to get paid (and pay) in stacker news. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck I would guess this is in part due to centralization which just scales much better. I say this more as a compliment than a criticism. Bundling and centralization is great for UX. @npub1jfu…m0gx still wins by being true to principles by offering pseudonymity and ability to exit. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Nope. There will always be new bugs, new attack vectors, and new optimizations. Not to mention human inclinations. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Definitely not my word! npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Just wait until people start declaring really complex spend condition scripts reflecting complex business interests wasteful. Then legitimate financial transactions will be those that are only p2p between individuals. Once the goal posts can move a little, they can move anywhere. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Yeah. If you need censorship to save something then it’s probably not worth saving in the first place. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Plenty of custodians are voluntarily chosen. Most ppl voluntarily choose Coinbase. That’s more of a concern if you’re choosing a custodian/federation because you have no choice. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Bitdevs should be fun this month 😅 npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck I think performance under pressure by individuals is different than how groups react under duress. Think “never let a crisis go to waste” or things like the Patriot Act or bailouts/giveaways post-GFC npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Yep! Planning and building under urgency is much riskier npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck https://open.spotify.com/track/0LQtEJt7x0s6knb6RKdRYc?si=5649a70795864968 npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck 😑 npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Because you’ve been living on the coasts until now 😁 npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Heh, yep exactly. That used blockstack's distributed storage protocol on top of their blockchain. But this could probably be done just as well with nostr. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Ideally you could have this be in a form where the author also gets paid. It works for one author per relay but to scale to one relay to many authors, something like delegated 3rd party caveats in macaroons could work. You could also use nostr to not just get the content, but leave the content encrypted and then users could only read it once the relay gets a decryption key from the author after a confirmed payment. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck That feeling when you spend hours trying to fix a bug in a hackathon project, get a normal nights sleep after event, find it’s a simple five minute fix after looking at it again once well rested 🤦♂️. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck At least they told you why you were suspended! I’m still waiting for my response. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Great point. What you’re describing is a change to the protocol, which by definition would not be how it works today. But yes, removing OP_RETURN limits (which I believe is just policy anyway) and the segwit discount would make the market more free. Discriminating against data (a la current segwit discount and OP_RETURN limits does) is would not. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Can’t see how it wouldn’t! npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Utxos haven’t been spent yet so they haven’t been signed. You can verify by verifying all of the blocks. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck At some point what is concise will become a subjective value. The way we make that objective is by scarce block size and the free market. Costs encourage users to be as concise as possible. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck What other conference would you want to be at this week in ATX https://nostr.build/i/nostr.build_ff8de411235a817c63ebbb78859ded6f54c6e26ff31f285eba42621f056dc06f.jpg npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Always a sign of a good conference when you’ve onboarded at least one of your cab drivers to bitcoin. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Yaaaaasssss!! npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Right. So it wasn’t Satoshi’s vision to “allow beachballs” therefore beach balls are bad and unfair and should be disallowed by any means necessary so that the “right” passengers don’t have to pay too much. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck By the way, do you know why there’s a witness discount? npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Limiting data on witnesses makes no sense and would break many use cases of bitcoin including those that are “purely monetary”. I’m not appealing to authority as an opt out. I’m making the point that npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck I think I just failed the Turing test npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Ugh. I wish I could enjoy it more. It just makes me depressed, but maybe that’s because I don’t buy the inevitability position. We’re going to have to work for the future we want. With plenty of opportunity to mess it up. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Nothing like technical controversy in bitcoin to tickle even many bitcoiners’ authoritarian funny bone. Humans are tribal. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck I think it’s intellectually consistent to say segwit and taproot were mistakes. I don’t agree but I respect the position. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck No. Eventually the beach balls will have to pay a higher and higher fee. If ordinals are useless than it will become less and less worthwhile to pay for. The protocol designers from the start expected blocks to fill up which would drive up fees which would support the network. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck I mean the whole point of taproot and by extension segwit which was meant to lay the ground work was to make it more expressive. If we’re saying that we should be deciding which cases expressiveness should be “allowed” which is a really scary prospect to me. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Lol. Autocorrect from title but yeah still works 😂 npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Love the bounty rifle 😂 npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Yep! Built on the same protocol. Sphinx Chat was effectively the first podcasting 2.0 app. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Sphinx Chat (which uses the lightning network’s TLV field as a messaging rail) has supported this for a while now. Different use cases compared to Nostr in terms of protocol, but having payment as layer one of a chat protocol has some real killer applications. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck The sats are still ordered the same way since one of the characteristics of coin joins is they’re still basically just normal transactions. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck It’s not a guarantee it’s just as I said, moving physical parts can wear out more easily. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Read/write time is faster for ssd I believe and also might have a longer shelf life because no physical moving pieces to wear out but otherwise either should be fine as you say. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Right. That’s my point. The block limit is set and hasn’t been increased since segwit. Inscriptions/ordinals aren’t and cant change that. They are just using the limit that the whole network of nodes advocated for with segwit. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Interestingly there is not even a standard raspberry pi! They keep getting better all the time (old model 3s basically are strongly discouraged as of a couple years ago for most node running software) which means they should be able to keep up. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Then bitcoin was/is already broken. Has nothing to do with inscriptions. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Block limit hasn’t changed since segwit. Filling up blocks with more data (that is paid for) has always been the goal (which is why developing scaling solutions has been so important). The nature of that content is irrelevant. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Fair point. There is a purpose which is essentially censorship resistant data and value transfer. The protocol however does not care about the nature/purpose of that data and value though. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck “Purpose” is subjective and is irrelevant. If the protocol has to care about the content of transactions then we’ve already lost. The only way that it can be “abused” is causing centralization (MEV, large blocks) or if miners can’t maximize fee revenue. All else is irrelevant. To suggest otherwise is asking for censorship. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck “Governments, if they endure, always tend increasingly to the aristocratic. No government in history has been known to evade this pattern. And as the aristocracy develops, government tends to act more and more exclusively in the interest of the ruling class, whether that class be hereditary royalty or oligarchs of financial empires or entrenched bureaucracy.” npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Its soundtrack was the soundtrack for my work the past week. Great both for the nerd/tech angle as well as understanding what’s wrong with authoritarian regimes npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck I wouldn’t say you can have too many but you don’t want to aim for the lowest common denominator either. That said, I think there are things we can do to attract quality devs/engineers too. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Maybe a good parallel is that a JavaScript conference is probably going to be more full than a Linux one. It probably shouldn’t even be a goal for bitcoin to aim to be like the former. Events like btc++ and TABConf imo are generally the right size to also maintain quality for this reason. Scaling Bitcoin had this vibe too. Much smaller but every talk just had my head hurting from the density of info. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck I’m a huge fan of vercel. Great for quick deployments of apps. Easy learning curve for serverless, and great for quick projects that you want/need to deploy quickly (I haven’t used it at scale but my understanding is it does that well too). npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Trumps biggest problem (and strength in many ways) has always been that he doesn’t really stand for anything. The move just never captured his imagination/attention enough. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Damn. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Yeah I agree. Clients should be able to fix this but the protocol seems to make it easy for this to happen. And this happened on damus which seems to be the practically the reference. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Nostr is still so buggy I can’t see what this is originally responding to. But yeah I agree. Thinking I might take a stab at something for a hackathon. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Wait… you’re not allowed to post substack links? npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck In case the links didn't render fully, this for @btcpp npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck If you're in Austin at the end of the month, definitely try and make it to the highest signal-to-noise ratio conference of the [Northern Hemisphere] Spring time! npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck The cool thing about nostr is that clients can choose to be exclusive but the protocol itself doesn’t care. It might be uncomfortable to much of the bitcoin community on here but a sign of nostr winning will probably be a competing client that adds support for tipping in other alts npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Could already be possible today! https://github.com/bucko13/lit-subscriptions npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck So what’s the AI bot du jour for helping put together a slideshow presentation? npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck I love me a good shakshuka npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Oh, and if you're in Austin this week, we'll be talking about this (and much more!) at the Austin bitdevs socratic seminar: https://austinbitdevs.com/2023-03-16-socratic-seminar-38 npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck And for those of you still allowed on the bird app, here's the announcement post over there: https://twitter.com/unchainedcap/status/1636395076866781184 npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck We've been working on a lot of important things at Unchained but it's been a while since we've been able to give open source as much resources as we would have liked. Really excited and proud of the set of features we're announcing this week supporting Ledger 2.0 wallet policy registration. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck #[2] will you be my bridge? npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck I don’t know the owners, but I do love buccees! npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Ha! I just love being a hermit too much I think. Get work done, spend time with my wife and kid and enjoy this beautiful weather in my garden! npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Yeah the hodl invoice with PoP embedded in the LSAT basically is a great way to accomplish this plus I think you can still retain privacy if you use signing of challenges, which allows verification on a need to know basis npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck I’d love to see something like this built in a trustless way such that you don’t have to trust that the prism will split the payment (which is how it’s done in podcasting 2.0 right now). I built a PoC of this for a hackathon a few years ago using HODL invoices and LSATs, in a project ironically called “Prism” npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck The crazy thing about not being on Twitter is that it took me almost two days to really hear about the second largest bank failure in US history, and that was only after my wife asked me about it after seeing it on her Twitter feed for the past two days. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Was just talking about this too. Great movie (watched on your recommendation!) npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Seeing as how Twitter still hasn't repealed my suspension nearly a half-year in, here's a repost of the timeline of my very strange suspension in which no rules were violated and I remain banned in a post-Elon takeover world. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Unfortunately I think it’s more of a human problem more than anything else. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck People will also eventually be incentivized to post things that get most reactions (like on Twitter) either ones that reaffirm biases so your “tribe” will like things with sats, or anger ppl on other side, because those reactions can lead to more eyeballs and more sats. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Give it time. It'll happen here too once it gets popular enough. It was the same thing on Twitter in the early days too. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Glad to see more and more attention being brought to this modern genocide! Good for you for hosting the discussion. npub15gaw9fpcwrleq332pl95xndencvwgwdtfee6ejlngp7waeh0e35sg8r670 buck Always interesting to see volatile fee markets through the lens of txfees.watch alerts. While there's been a lot of movement, the average still seems to be relatively low even with actually full blocks, moving above and below 10 sats/vbyte a couple times a day for the past week.