>were not present or less visible
It means they'd have to come in good faith or not at all. It's not gagging, it's having standards of what the group is about and what values it upholds, like we here would not tolerate anyone saying TWAW.
I think it's a shame that both GC sites have adopted the big tech-approved formats that depersonalize users and encourage butthurt, Twitter and Reddit respectively. I think forums is where it's at.
>Now, I see that even radical feminists would prefer not to have to scroll through non-radfem content to find other radfems.
It doesn't work like this. Radfem content can't exist in a place that doesn't put effort into encouraging and protecting it because it's easy prey to literally everyone, from men to "feminist" handmaidens to "feminist" "radfems" who think that radfem is ranting about tims and porn, so this 1) makes it not worth it to post it because you're getting piled on and generally made to feel unwelcome 2) social pressure and barely any support in groups that define themselves as pro-woman make you doubt yourself even more when you're already doing something that most people do not do and judge. That's the reason why currently there is none.
>Maybe the problem isn’t that it was restricting content, but that it was unclear about what the rules were and marketed itself as a general discussion platform instead of a Democrat/establishment/pharma platform.
Idk in my understanding Twitter is just a butthurt generator
Mynona /
npub12m…c6z5s
2023-09-25 11:20:22
in reply to nevent1q…klpx
Author Public Key
npub12mqavt20vez4qkhxt3vzm7wdepardgcv3ud7rg0uawxr3sc77qdscc6z5sSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-09-25 11:20:22Event JSON
{
"id": "ff257c842395caadb64ccbc7bab197cce380411b2071f0bc0bb31c891d82ef79",
"pubkey": "56c1d62d4f6645505ae65c582df9cdc87a36a30c8f1be1a1fceb8c38c31ef01b",
"created_at": 1695633622,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"9d6d8a8f2fccf02b5e6987d8762d8073f3a3ae2e4dbbeac1e4ca627946fa240f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"c160bb1613630d276364cd3efdb4f5e79f3a8ceb5219ae4c19ea98871eb8a78b",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"92ed8bc0248d2e3109be57678b56769be00b7f2ad02b41061f903f038943330e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://spinster.xyz/objects/6d9e39c6-fa1d-4170-b31f-aa769dbb1fdc",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "\u003ewere not present or less visible\n\nIt means they'd have to come in good faith or not at all. It's not gagging, it's having standards of what the group is about and what values it upholds, like we here would not tolerate anyone saying TWAW.\n\nI think it's a shame that both GC sites have adopted the big tech-approved formats that depersonalize users and encourage butthurt, Twitter and Reddit respectively. I think forums is where it's at.\n\n\u003eNow, I see that even radical feminists would prefer not to have to scroll through non-radfem content to find other radfems. \n\nIt doesn't work like this. Radfem content can't exist in a place that doesn't put effort into encouraging and protecting it because it's easy prey to literally everyone, from men to \"feminist\" handmaidens to \"feminist\" \"radfems\" who think that radfem is ranting about tims and porn, so this 1) makes it not worth it to post it because you're getting piled on and generally made to feel unwelcome 2) social pressure and barely any support in groups that define themselves as pro-woman make you doubt yourself even more when you're already doing something that most people do not do and judge. That's the reason why currently there is none.\n\n\u003eMaybe the problem isn’t that it was restricting content, but that it was unclear about what the rules were and marketed itself as a general discussion platform instead of a Democrat/establishment/pharma platform.\n\nIdk in my understanding Twitter is just a butthurt generator",
"sig": "86496f7ff715dda814abb4da3c5c3556027bae0750a768fc89f7fca20e1f2cabfd24f2a3a5528cad436f36b2944f3b371e03bb55e668d1f3846cb22bad8d64b8"
}