Mynona

Public Key

npub12mqavt20vez4qkhxt3vzm7wdepardgcv3ud7rg0uawxr3sc77qdscc6z5s

NIP-05 Address

[email protected]

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs9dswk948kv32sttn9ckpdl8xus73k5vxg7xlp587whrpccv00qxcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wdmksetjv5hxxmmds4vm52

Publishing to

relay.noswhere.com

Author Public Key

npub12mqavt20vez4qkhxt3vzm7wdepardgcv3ud7rg0uawxr3sc77qdscc6z5s

Show more details

Last Notes

2024-02-11 14:40:49

- reply

Men get aroused from wearing the clothes THEY designed to objectify women and reduce them to sex objects --> women must get aroused by refusing to wear the clothes that reduce them to sexual objects. Logics, girls

2024-02-01 21:54:50

- reply

No matter how much men whine about the draft, they never do anything about it because army is the quintessential expression of what they want

2024-02-01 20:12:50

- reply

Being born into the subservient class means you do not experience power and do not develop a taste for it. Being born into the oppressor class means that you not only get used to power but you come to psychologically depend on it

2024-01-30 02:59:42

- reply

Is the boss one of them

2024-01-26 17:12:38

- reply

When I go to some resto a lot of times and order the same thing I start feeling bad for several reasons
1) the staff is probably jealous of me being able to afford eating outside of home so often
2) I probably look autistic eating the same exact thing and never trying anything else

2024-01-19 02:41:51

- reply

"Research" about homosexuality is still concerned with how to cure it though. There's nothing to research about being able to feel sexual attraction, and no mammal except humans has orientations, pointing at the fact that heterosexuality is conditioned. You can only obsessively look for a gay gene if you keep believing that homosexuality is a disorder. And then if a gay gene is found "for progress", it will still be used for cure, because men made sure that it's cool for lesbians and gays to hate themselves and want to be straight. No treatment will have to be forced, people will ask for it.

2024-01-08 19:34:59

- reply

Sex is not rape, say everyone else

2024-01-01 14:58:55

- reply

Well first of all, women were genocided and hunted for hundreds of years during which all of their rights, credibility and independence were destroyed so they can be good slaves for individual men. See witch hunts. So saying that chattel slavery is exclusive to black people and that saying otherwise is offensive is just ignorant.
Secondly, you keep denying the fact that men are 100% responsible for the aforementioned "division". Women gain nothing from being a subservient class, and also women cannot just wish it away or change it by being nice to men. If women being nice to men would somehow bridge that gap, why, we would already have equality, but somehow 99.9999% of women loving their oppressor more than their own life did absolutely nothing for women or humanity in general, only perpetuated everyone's misery.
And thirdly, seeing women's exploitation as a low level issue is a massive lack of awareness. Women's economic and reproductive exploitation is the foundation of male society and everything that goes on in it.

2024-01-01 05:17:03

- reply

What's "promoting humanity"? If recognizing that a group of people oppresses you is against humanity then nobody should have ever resisted slavery, exploitation or conquest. Not being nice to your rapist and murderer = being against humanity!

2023-12-31 23:23:13

- reply

You literally can't exclude men from humanity as an individual. No matter what you think about them and how much you do not include them in your life and how much you rage about them on the internet, their status as default humans doesn't change and their privilege doesn't go away.

2023-12-31 23:04:25

- reply

Even though it was addressed to Isobel, I should note that you didn't mind the statement that women exclude men from humanity, even though women did not base their entire society on male slavery

2023-12-31 20:23:19

- reply

You don't need to be against. You just need to be realistic about the fact that they're against you and that it's not something you can control or wish away. Men exclude women from humanity. To say that the opposite happens because women recognize this fact is just.... Idk

2023-12-26 08:17:51

- reply

I think it's still the mindset of seeking approval. We're not brought up to debate science and philosophy, the most important thing women should do is submit, which means we should do the things we're not punished for and avoid the thing we're punished for. Men do not live in the constant state of being subjected to carrot and stick training. For them disagreement is disagreement, not a threat to their safety and dignity.

2023-12-26 08:02:41

- reply

Hmmm. I wouldn't say that men have mastered it either. I mean, it's easy for men, because whatever they argue, they always agree on the fundamental thing -- that women should be enslaved. And the things they most heatedly argue about have to do with how to go about this enslavement. So their disagreement is never fundamental and always based on mutual interest.
Meanwhile feminists try to convince women that they shouldn't be enslaved at all. Women live in a state of neurotic approval seeking because they have learned that stepping out of line gets them hurt. Ironically they take this mindset with them even when they decide to be feminists, leading to relationship-based opinions. Also it makes sure that they react in an explosive manner when male dominance is disagreed with because again they learned that not submitting to it is akin to pressing the button that gives you electric shock.
So while men can look more open minded and confident superficially, they owe it to the fact that they never argue about anything meaningful.

2023-12-25 22:16:33

- reply

Women in "feminism" treat each other exactly like women outside of feminism you mean. I think one of the most important things to establish in a real feminist community is that disagreement doesn't mean personal hatred and attack. But we can't even begin to address how we address conflict if everyone is triggered by the very idea of it.

2023-12-25 22:06:48

- reply

Sounds like high school mean girl dynamic rather than friendship. Which is exactly in line with what passes for "feminism" nowadays

2023-12-24 15:19:28

- reply

Yeah I checked before deciding if unleashing all my fury is justified

2023-12-24 14:53:07

- reply

Petty feminist squabbles are to below me ... BUT ALSO NINA PALEY......
On the other hand the author is 18 and I went easy on her

2023-12-24 11:35:45

- reply

Men will fuck just about any hole. Any hole is a vagina, and vagina is a hole.

2023-12-23 17:56:52

- reply

Don't worry about conservatives 1 and conservatives 2, they ALWAYS try to control and brainwash women

2023-12-22 09:06:05

I was told that I should advertise my substack that I created yesterday. I mostly did it for therapeutic purposes because I never get a chance to explain myself fully when I'm just commenting on someone else's posts, so if someone is interested in detailed explanations of my very outrageous ideas, here you go
https://maytreejane.substack.com/

2023-12-21 19:44:48

- reply

Male-brained ideas prevent the author of that comment from thinking. Females know when they're ovulating and they are pretty capable of initiating intercourse.

2023-12-20 07:57:43

- reply

If the title is phrased as a question, the answer is no

2023-12-12 17:01:45

- reply

Hmm. I don't think he felt bad about dodging parole, the first song clearly indicates that he thinks that slaving for twenty years for stealing a loaf of bread to feed your family is unfair. He only felt bad when the other guy got accused in his place and just generally uncomfy that he needs to hide his past.
Also don't you just love the well written slow burn realistic romance there?

2023-12-11 11:37:41

- reply

Don't worry, most people on this instance are too absorbed in screaming about their conspiracies or issues to notice your mistakes

2023-12-10 10:21:28

- reply

96% seems too low tbh. It means that 4 child rapists out of 100 are female. If that was the case, the media would have enough female child abuse stories to convince everyone that it's literally only women doing it.

2023-12-10 04:44:55

- reply

These women are just using feminists as mommy figures in their teenage rebellions. They're so weak and cowardly they most likely didn't dare to rebel against their actual parents and certainly not men.

2023-12-08 12:10:31

- reply

I'm using Lantern and Browsec. They're free but idk if they sell data

2023-12-08 12:07:25

- reply

Yeah she also has a similar essay about golf. Suddenly makes sense why men are so obsessed with such a boring ass sport

2023-12-08 11:59:43

- reply

Well it's still "normal" football but JB argues that football is a sexual sublimation and repeats the patterns of male sexuality i.e rape. Gates are women/holes, ball is the dick, a team works together to keep their "hole" virgin and to violate the "hole" of the other team.

2023-12-08 11:30:52

- reply

Jo Brew mentioned that in an essay. If society had menstruation games as opposed to celebrating what a male body does best, men would be seen as physically inferior.
https://jobrew.substack.com/p/football-is-sublimated-gang-rape

2023-12-07 16:34:11

- reply

Not to be that "conolization" person, but Polynesia has been subjected to European colonization. Which means that if they had a non-patriarchal order before, it was destroyed and replaced with a patriarchal one.

2023-12-07 01:35:10

- reply

The goal of patriarchy is not to genocide women, it's like saying that rich people spend so much money because they want to become poor. Under male dominance, women are defined as baby making machines, therefore forcing them to give birth doesn't violate their rights or their nature.

2023-12-04 04:18:05

- reply

I wonder when women will learn the lesson that male sexual "attention" is worth nothing and has nothing to do with love though

2023-11-29 17:18:07

- reply

It's made by two russian dudes

2023-11-25 09:04:44

- reply

Alright
>For example, in Western cultures, homosexual males exhibit comparatively more gender-nonconforming behavior during childhood than heterosexual males.[57] Retrospective studies conducted in Brazil, Guatemala, Independent Samoa, the Philippines, Thailand, and Turkey have found that the same is true of homosexual males raised in these non-Western cultures.
Weird that. Does fraternal birth order also influence social conformity? Sex roles as we know are socially enforced and aren't biologically hardwired. Why isn't it the main finding of the study then? I think it's way more interesting and that the elevated rates of exhibiting socially undesirable orientation would actually be related to that, than some innate attraction/repulsion to dicks or vulvas which is frankly idiotic.

2023-11-25 07:47:26

- reply

Let me guess, "they tried hard to stop wanking to cp but couldn't" type of evidence

2023-11-25 04:48:52

- reply

So far there's no evidence that any sexuality in humans is innate though

2023-11-23 01:03:01

- reply

Except if you don't establish a consensus on what "women first" means, you'll end up with a bunch of people with completely different and opposing ideas, some tugging in different directions, but the majority just sitting on their ass because they're afraid of conflict. But establishing the said consensus means basically settings unified standards for the movement which is *checks notes* dictatorship and purity spiral.

2023-11-22 19:46:45

- reply

War never changes, and so don't the articles related to it. If women being raped was considered a serious matter outside of feminist circles that constitute "nobody" for the people who write these articles, there would be no wars to start with.

2023-11-21 19:49:01

- reply

Nevermind. "Feminists" tell me that they want and like sex every day. So much that they're willing to sacrifice their freedom and lives for it. It's not about being conditioned to derive worth from approval and from giving men what they want. They just like it and want it 👍👍 True fact

2023-11-20 18:53:40

- reply

Now women are accused of being emotionally stunted by men? Lol that's a new one

2023-11-20 12:29:04

- reply

Lol she says "most" as if it's a very bad thing to say when actually saying "most men" easily translates to "but not my Nigel" which translates to "no men" because every man is someone's Nigel. Unless you say all men you don't get the message across.

2023-11-19 00:40:13

- reply

The most interesting part that describes how to gaslight women out of feminism is cut off

2023-11-17 22:08:47

- reply

Still waiting for the day GC recognizes that if femininity is the ultimate humiliation for men then maybe it's bad for women too

2023-11-17 18:13:23

- reply

Meanwhile "feminists": literally everything about our personalities and preferences is inborn and is rooted in caveman days

2023-11-17 05:26:31

- reply

If you do be ready for black poo and possibly diarrhea. I didn't know of this iron supplement side effect before I got it

2023-11-16 19:56:10

- reply

Crusades didn't exist. People are just drawn to religious tendencies because dancing 👍

2023-11-15 14:51:30

- reply

I don't know if all societies have it. Some researches showing that ancient people did not have sex-based labor division and that there is actually less gender in primitive societies pop up from time to time. You can generally notice that the difference in appearance (nonbiological traits) and behaviour between women and men are the biggest where women's reproductive exploitation is the strongest. When women are primarily exploited as work force the same as men, there's very little difference between women and men if any. See how the fashion was changing from early to late middle ages, when the witch hunts were happening, and the purpose of witch hunts was to turn women into a reproductively exploited class. What protective function does gender serve?

2023-11-14 23:38:13

Short bus wokentarden moron based science

2023-11-14 15:11:54

- reply

Therapy is bullshit 98% of the time. There's most people whom it doesn't help, then there's a small group of people who just use it to vent and chat and like it, and then there's a tiny minority of people who were actually helped by it either due to being very lucky or using it as a support for their own self-work. Depression, anxiety, bpd, ptsd are called disorders because they disrupt your "normal" functioning but they're absolutely normal universal reactions to situations of stress or trauma or helplessness.

2023-11-14 07:22:26

- reply

People actually click on ads?

2023-11-13 05:08:38

- reply

Ah yeah, the holy sex that people literally die without

2023-11-13 05:07:45

- reply

Why doesn't it make historical sense when a country that is having it's culture and language erased
for generations would develop nazism?

2023-11-13 04:53:32

- reply

The same thing could be said about childfree 100 years ago

2023-11-13 04:49:49

- reply

How about pro separatism then? Why reject only one bad thing when you can reject them all and avoid any medical intervention and male violence as well?

2023-11-12 20:39:02

- reply

Who said that? Anyway men and their handmaidens constantly try to defang feminism by saying and doing bullshit on it's behalf. I don't see it as real feminists fault, but as patriarchy's opposition.

2023-11-09 13:36:51

- reply

If it's inappropriate for men to perform femininity, why is it appropriate for women though

2023-10-31 22:08:26

- reply

Also to get crucified on spinster and ovarit

2023-10-30 15:43:34

- reply

What's nanbao? Search results tell me that it's the chinese viagra lol

2023-10-22 17:05:35

- reply

She said that too many "GC" are conservatives although I don't understand why everyone is waking up it only now and not five years ago

2023-10-07 14:33:09

- reply

People who think that religion creates mind control and not the other way around are stupid

2023-10-06 02:29:43

- reply

Because it generates massive profits for people who already have tons of money, creating an endless enforcement loop, and it sets feminist progress all the way back. Short answer: monies

2023-10-05 23:57:28

- reply

As I keep saying, women don't like real men

2023-09-25 09:59:08

- reply

Sure, normie women need to rant about genderism too. But how come that the anglosphere doesn't have real feminist sites in the first place? I can't believe it was always the case.

2023-09-25 06:19:47

- reply

Because there's no dialogue aside from fights, no discussion aside from daily life, nothing changes. And it's not just me who is banned by the entire instance. New posters who come and post analytical feminist stuff are ignored. Only thing getting engagement is "troon" posts which repeat themselves over and over. But hey, at least we have freedom of speech and aren't restricted by the disgusting totalitarian requirement to be a feminist.

2023-09-22 09:50:23

- reply

Can't believe you were about my current age when I joined this site

2023-09-18 07:13:40

- reply

I don't but I have a collection of earrings I can't wear

2023-09-17 15:10:14

- reply

Icon

2023-09-05 13:48:02

- reply

So which is it, "we're the most hated and oppressed minority", or "if you don't join us you're ostracized by the entire society"

2023-09-02 08:30:26

- reply

Looked up this band. I guess all k-pop bands are engaged in "queer bating" now? I thought only guys do that. Also I read about them on kpopprofiles and one woman was described as "the guy"/"the girl crush", didn't really remember which one but then watched another one of their video and immediately understood that it's the one that sings with a more relaxed voice when other women's voiced are deliberately high pitched and "feminized". Seems like a deliberate move, and like... small-scale utilization of the methods that were used to make men attractive to women and make women disgusting to each other

2023-09-02 08:03:54

- reply

They should have women's band that dresses the same, I think it would be huge success

2023-09-01 19:37:23

- reply

Dude looks like a lady

2023-08-21 23:35:17

- reply

Same reason why people say "dating market". The narrative is determined by men, and for men sex and relationship is money and violence

2023-08-17 21:03:13

- reply

Sexual revolution was supposed to only benefit men from it's very start. Oh the willful ignorance

2023-08-16 20:17:27

- reply

People often mistake me for a native on the internet (they don't hear my thick ass accent), never been to an english-speaking country

2023-08-13 04:59:48

- reply

Closing it and opening it again helps

2023-08-06 07:00:02

- reply

You bet if it was some dude instead of Ghislaine nobody would even know about the case

2023-07-03 23:51:47

- reply

I know why, because of the messages you receive every day, because your entire nation is engaged in pretending to be progressive so you think that all of that stuff feminists say about men does not apply to the men you interact with because they say "consent" and "equality".
I don't know how feminist can NOT include at least emotional and personally-physical separation if minimal identification with your own sex, minimal awareness of how patriarchal consciousness is engineered to keep you down, will make you not want to interact with the people who actively mentally alienate you from your own sex and broadcast patriarchal messages. If you see this, the idea of separatism should not be offensive to you, it should be what you naturally strive for, and you will not see the idea that feminism = separatism as a personal attack. If you see it as an attack you do not recognize the negative influence men have on women. And if you don't, how do you even call yourself a feminist, nevermind radical?

2023-07-03 23:19:59

- reply

Nobody moved the goalposts, western women are just moving themselves away from them. Seriously you're living in one of the most comfortable nations but you cry the loudest about your inability to stop having nigels and male friends.

2023-07-03 22:38:47

- reply

What's the anchor you build your thoughts on, that without calling themselves "radfem" women can't physically get together and discuss stuff and do whatever? That without calling themselves radfem women are not worthy of help and compassion?

2023-07-01 15:46:46

- reply

That's because it's not an individual issue. Their sexuality is developed that way through everything they see. News, movies, songs, games, porn (of course) and even language where fuck is a slur and to fuck means to dominate and humiliate all teach this model of sexuality.

2023-06-24 20:48:50

- reply

That's backwards. The essence of imperialism is to appropriate AND assign inferiority to a group to justify extracting labor and resources from them. Silly irrational hatreds are the byproduct of exploitation, not the origin.

2023-06-12 19:21:34

- reply

You're wrong, sexologists (the purpose of sexology is to construct and control people's sexuality, so they're not scientists or pro-women in any way) were the first to insist that homosexuality is a biological defect/quirk because they couldn't understand how anyone would resist their brainwashing. Lesbian and gay liberation used to see this as offensive and sexualizing. LGB you describe was the group of mostly gays and some lesbians who decided to make a pact with the patriarchy/capitalism instead of fighting it.
What you say is still built on a premise that being able to feel attraction and who you're attracted to are inseparable, one. Therefore if people form/have one or the other orientation, this preference is biological because they can't eradicate their ability to feel sexual desire entirely. Well nobody can.

2023-06-12 07:33:07

- reply

Why go into complex evo psych when it's a result of obvious cultural processes?
1) women are dehumanised and vilified to justify exploitation
2) you can only love someone you see as a person and don't hate
3) being fucked by a man is dehumanising so fucking other men is taboo
4) therefore male sexuality is not able to normally and naturally develop as a two sided dynamic and instead it's being replaced by porn and it's one sided reenactment upon a woman
5) women are not taught to hate those who they are supposed to love so their sexuality is more normal and women react to the dynamic rather than images of dicks or whatever.. men aren't even dismembered into sexy body parts like women are for me to list anything else
So it makes sense that men don't react to something that doesn't resemble their favourite porn while women react to sexual stuff on the whole

2023-06-11 16:16:11

- reply

Keep in mind though. Even if you can say something without being banned it doesn't mean that AHS didn't put your account on watch

2023-06-10 00:42:24

- reply

Sure. Witch hunt era is really not dark ages.

2023-06-09 09:55:01

- reply

We never left dark ages. There was no point in history when government didn't struggle to oppress people while maintaining the image of acting in their best interests

2023-06-03 04:59:38

- reply

Well how can you not believe that there's something to it when so many people convincingly cry victimhood and suffering, what are you a monster? Forcing empathy out of people is how they convince everyone. Their "logic" is just for those rare moments when it doesn't work so they employ a different type of assault.

2023-06-03 04:41:41

- reply

Have you ever tried to cope with a close person trooning themselves? It's not an attack, a real question. It's a very traumatic experience and the way you "strongly believe" in it is just a compensation and it's equal in the magnitude to how you actually do not believe in it. What's genuine is wanting to believe, but not the belief itself.
Other magics you mentioned are easy to believe in it because it's normal to want to know the future or believe that there's something more out there. It does not contradict the immediate realty, it just gives the feeling that it's more interesting than it is.

2023-06-03 04:15:16

- reply

I think it's only money and nobody actually believes that people are born in the wrong body. Nobody truly treats troons as the opposite sex. Not allies, not doctors, not parents, not themselves.

2023-06-03 00:07:06

- reply

🙄 at these pictures. Children didn't watch enough porn to even know what genitals are "supposed" to look like in the first place for there to be a re-education about it. It's just grooming, breaking privacy and boundaries

2023-06-02 23:06:32

- reply

It's not a delusion because as an actual lesbian who does not identify with straight patterns and dynamics, I don't feel that queer shite represents me one bit, all I see is straight in a different package. Also you aren't even allowed to say that you prefer your own sex anymore. All that dick pushing it for a reason.

2023-06-02 23:01:55

- reply

All queer shite is still straight and straight-patterned. All 33y4y8 sexualities mean nothing because it's mostly women ending up with men and having babies anyway. As transmen or whatever. It's a distraction to make you think that we're moving from heteronormativity when we don't. The real moving on would look like full rejection of sex roles and promotion of equal non-violent non-performative sexuality. Does this happen?

2023-06-02 22:52:50

- reply

I don't notice any decrease of what they call "heteronormativity" these days. I really don't. The image of gays and especially lesbians media sells in rare moment of forced representation is mostly cringy and not attractive and straight-patterned. And if you don't think that not rolling back anti-abortion bills is no biggie then idk what to tell you, it's like you don't make a connection between forced birth and population growth

2023-06-02 22:47:10

- reply

Why fix what is not broke? What is the point of killing your own slaves? If depopulation was real they could just roll back their anti-abortion bills and stop advocating for traditional values. The population would decline instantly and effortlessly. No need for machines and viruses.

2023-05-31 00:25:57

This site needs some "weekly essay" event or something so we can have a community life that revolves around something more interesting than saying that men are men. Too bad I'm blocked by everyone and can't host it

2023-05-29 14:22:51

- reply

I'm trying to build on OP's argument but you're right. Also convincing yourself that your man is different is impossible if you use feminist optics in your life. It's just a version of "normalize and internalize".

2023-05-29 13:33:57

- reply

I tried to date men and can say that it's not true. How can you love someone who hates you and is not aligned with your interests? Two ways: either you normalise and internalise the misogyny, if you even can, or you will constantly cope with cognitive dissonance and the feeling of being invaded. Or your relationship does not imply love and connection, and in that case, what does it even imply and why are you putting effort into a man you don't care about?
All of these options undermine you and other women. And I haven't even started on the fact that most women do end up being just used domestically, sexually and emotionally by their Nigel.

2023-05-28 03:38:29

- reply

I thought we're talking about impossible scenarios.
When what I described was happening, men did not rape and enslave. They hijacked women's movement under them and convinced everyone that these women are the cause of everyone's problems. Their brainwashing was so effective every "feminist" nowadays will screech that political lesbians are awful and homophobic and original trannies when it is literally the opposite.
So I'm annoyed when someone's idea of women's liberation only considers beatings and killings