Ordinals and inscriptions aren’t using bitcoin the money. They are merely using #Bitcoin *nodes* to store their garbage, and the bitcoin *name* to sell it to people.
It makes perfect, and necessary,
logic to build, optimize, and restrict the #Bitcoin system to only allow and facilitate the bitcoin *money.*
This isn’t a contradiction, it isn’t censorship, it’s necessary to defining what the protocol even does.
Any other arguments you want to have about the difficulty, feasibility, or foolishness of making or trying to reverse changes or certain data that is already included are valid. But the above point is true no matter what side you take.
TheGuySwann / Guy Swann
npub1h8…6rpev
2023-12-09 18:50:56
Author Public Key
npub1h8nk2346qezka5cpm8jjh3yl5j88pf4ly2ptu7s6uu55wcfqy0wq36rpevPublished at
2023-12-09 18:50:56Event JSON
{
"id": "7f2e5b9ade95b1bdfcccbdea10d1b09c96c1eb1d2fdff81e3a746194790a9c83",
"pubkey": "b9e76546ba06456ed301d9e52bc49fa48e70a6bf2282be7a1ae72947612023dc",
"created_at": 1702144256,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"bitcoin"
],
[
"t",
"bitcoin"
]
],
"content": "Ordinals and inscriptions aren’t using bitcoin the money. They are merely using #Bitcoin *nodes* to store their garbage, and the bitcoin *name* to sell it to people.\n\nIt makes perfect, and necessary,\n logic to build, optimize, and restrict the #Bitcoin system to only allow and facilitate the bitcoin *money.*\n\nThis isn’t a contradiction, it isn’t censorship, it’s necessary to defining what the protocol even does. \n\nAny other arguments you want to have about the difficulty, feasibility, or foolishness of making or trying to reverse changes or certain data that is already included are valid. But the above point is true no matter what side you take.",
"sig": "059194841d7f142d0e7d57302e7d776bd8e57990d84fe05cc646e459dea03a114033fffde76946fbd42d425392a5708df18ff28cfeea22ae304c6559fcfb5541"
}