vinney on Nostr: "publisher censoring" is irrelevant when there are infinite publishers available all ...
"publisher censoring" is irrelevant when there are infinite publishers available all connected via the same network. You can't be "censored" on Nostr, but a relay is well within its rights to block you (including after user suggestions. "reports", as it were)
If you're on a "single publisher" network (like Twitter):
1. You're asking for it.
2. They own your content, not you, so it's not censoring. It's their property to do what they want with.
If you want to truly be censorship-immune, you must be fully sovereign in your compute and your network.
Published at
2024-06-08 15:23:10Event JSON
{
"id": "7bdd27c71212dfc79882dcb76a20960f378d9cf210fd3c9afa3330f05682e885",
"pubkey": "2efaa715bbb46dd5be6b7da8d7700266d11674b913b8178addb5c2e63d987331",
"created_at": 1717852990,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"9782d72467efb7b68ed57c807049781ecaeba21fedc3d7cd91328874a0b99b4e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"1577e4599dd10c863498fe3c20bd82aafaf829a595ce83c5cf8ac3463531b09b"
]
],
"content": "\"publisher censoring\" is irrelevant when there are infinite publishers available all connected via the same network. You can't be \"censored\" on Nostr, but a relay is well within its rights to block you (including after user suggestions. \"reports\", as it were)\n\nIf you're on a \"single publisher\" network (like Twitter):\n1. You're asking for it.\n2. They own your content, not you, so it's not censoring. It's their property to do what they want with.\n\nIf you want to truly be censorship-immune, you must be fully sovereign in your compute and your network. ",
"sig": "70961ebffbf36ab08cd2e6cb823df3a09d2d077dfca08dc3bb6ea3eb846cd3621e73907dcff7bdffb4f6eec871d9db511f48f1b30af61be8f04f65c8a8fb190f"
}