Han Shan on Nostr: it isn't a false equivalence. It isn't the *same* trust assumption, I didn't say ...

it isn't a false equivalence.
It isn't the *same* trust assumption, I didn't say that.

I just pointed out you don't have perfect supply guarantees either.
Which is completely true.

you're posturing like you've audited all the code, wrote your own and sum the utxo set all the time.
which you don't. you're posing like you have good guarantees when yiu actually just TRUST 3rd parties to perform checks for you.

And if you want to trust all the various 3rd parties that guarantee your supply and private key security, fine. I do too.

I'm just pointing out it is NOT a big ask to then *also* trust range proofs.
You are ALREADY making similar trust assertions.