How much worse do you think ephemeral anchors are (incentive wise) than the current dust-anchors? At first glance I would think the 546 sat difference is insignificant in a >200 sat/vbyte environment.
Meanwhile 0-value outputs reduce complexity and afaik are essential for ln-symmetry.
One final point: regarding recommendation 3, I don't think anyone would want to move forward with v3 without ephemeral anchors.
provoost / Sjors Provoost
npub1s6z…wk4c
2024-01-01 14:09:44
in reply to nevent1q…jsjw
Author Public Key
npub1s6z7hmmx2vud66f3utxd70qem8cwtggx0jgc7gh8pqwz2k8cltuqrdwk4cPublished at
2024-01-01 14:09:44Event JSON
{
"id": "8fecbd4633fea97a86701e91ff8bb34f707ae8827ba25855bfb06adc033cc185",
"pubkey": "8685ebef665338dd6931e2ccdf3c19d9f0e5a1067c918f22e7081c2558f8faf8",
"created_at": 1704114584,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"1de85aaf3054b09f8cf0c9ecf2c7f4cd4a445c2d755acf023455e45065edf491"
],
[
"e",
"94966d9c08ce703f329c2b5e255d998fd5df4da2467db47915e860c366dfdf94"
],
[
"p",
"ccaa58e37c99c85bc5e754028a718bd46485e5d3cb3345691ecab83c755d48cc"
]
],
"content": "How much worse do you think ephemeral anchors are (incentive wise) than the current dust-anchors? At first glance I would think the 546 sat difference is insignificant in a \u003e200 sat/vbyte environment.\n\nMeanwhile 0-value outputs reduce complexity and afaik are essential for ln-symmetry.\n\nOne final point: regarding recommendation 3, I don't think anyone would want to move forward with v3 without ephemeral anchors.",
"sig": "e7a2a510674b6494ba0762f4c247bb4ab3477419e0a614be07841416e72254b982a14ed88fe9f88695a7356e144c87e33c25d344ca58d43e8b03d136f40ad30b"
}