But the recipient still is publicly marked as having received BTC, right? It's just not necessary to zap for allowance and many other types of payment.
And a completely private zap would maybe be good as a payment receipt but then it wouldn't be a zap, would it?
Leo Wandersleb
npub1gm…78rf6
2024-07-01 20:42:50
in reply to nevent1q…434t
Author Public Key
npub1gm7tuvr9atc6u7q3gevjfeyfyvmrlul4y67k7u7hcxztz67ceexs078rf6Published at
2024-07-01 20:42:50Event JSON
{
"id": "89f0c299537f74f62e2558615829401e9c4ae3f1612d0fbd2b50e90e93087ee5",
"pubkey": "46fcbe3065eaf1ae7811465924e48923363ff3f526bd6f73d7c184b16bd8ce4d",
"created_at": 1719859370,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"65ae73e0b805b3ac0486bbd1b200013449ae2d97f1a5ee3e76e717e6ce555d58",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"2a930ce4f483736fd1ce8720ed8655038742455ede6c894137ac5f7512d4925e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"58c741aa630c2da35a56a77c1d05381908bd10504fdd2d8b43f725efa6d23196",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "But the recipient still is publicly marked as having received BTC, right? It's just not necessary to zap for allowance and many other types of payment.\n\nAnd a completely private zap would maybe be good as a payment receipt but then it wouldn't be a zap, would it?",
"sig": "d4d9840ecde743929755ac34ed325435f6995c20e2edeeb6abe4129a5128ae0f69b2a41be340eca6b761652ba2afd2157441624c0e8c4c4144cac41db1f829ed"
}