So you would be willing to have your feed spammed all day with random messages just to have “ censorship resistance”?
Censoring activity that is trying to disrupt the network activity is not censorship. You are not censoring a legitimate actor in the network.
Should we allow 0 fee bitcoin transactions in every block, do you consider that censorship that we don’t allow it?
People who think censoring spam is censorship in the reasonable definition of what people mean are wrong.
jb55 / Will
npub1xt…vkk5s
2024-09-18 14:45:45
in reply to nevent1q…7wrj
Author Public Key
npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5sPublished at
2024-09-18 14:45:45Event JSON
{
"id": "0c1f0d934893699110f1e2e9762505f95cc5beb12a35e6bf2c77b949c10778b3",
"pubkey": "32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245",
"created_at": 1726663545,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"dd5fb50034b3d8c1191d76e57bc73e0164eea5a9ab295c0d4f717931aa02618a",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"aa76f47603e0cca2cfd868d80d0da1177d5115703a181eafe61e5953c71a7c2f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"9fec72d579baaa772af9e71e638b529215721ace6e0f8320725ecbf9f77f85b1"
],
[
"p",
"2f29aa33c2a3b45c2ef32212879248b2f4a49a002bd0de0fa16c94e138ac6f13"
]
],
"content": "So you would be willing to have your feed spammed all day with random messages just to have “ censorship resistance”? \n\nCensoring activity that is trying to disrupt the network activity is not censorship. You are not censoring a legitimate actor in the network.\n\nShould we allow 0 fee bitcoin transactions in every block, do you consider that censorship that we don’t allow it?\n\nPeople who think censoring spam is censorship in the reasonable definition of what people mean are wrong.",
"sig": "4ffe51868f19b84c953462014db4d52710ba5383741847e212b406cd7b376e2bc5cc483bb6e949935743c2eabc1b7f5d1134593e058f3158668b34894d36f767"
}