Thanks, I’m following both of them now, too.
I’ve always had the assumption that a payment for a good/service always has counter-party risk with whoever you’re exchanging with.
So I would never consider eCash self-custodial, but I’ve always thought of it more like a simplified UX involving an additional party for an already somewhat risky transaction.
You could give me 10,000 sats from cold storage and I might still run away with the coffee we had agreed I’d hand over in exchange.
dk / David King
npub1kuy…kdj8
2024-06-13 19:47:53
in reply to nevent1q…s7wn
Author Public Key
npub1kuy0wwf0tzzqvgfv8zpw0vaupkds3430jhapwrgfjyn7ecnhpe0qj9kdj8Published at
2024-06-13 19:47:53Event JSON
{
"id": "4cec23fb4139959e1069cb1fe83be8940c7580c745d68be93fedc68b4060a9c4",
"pubkey": "b708f7392f588406212c3882e7b3bc0d9b08d62f95fa170d099127ece2770e5e",
"created_at": 1718300873,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"01a795664565f2375c1b2e66d5bc7ab22ad2bebec0f9b0b0e768e8764b40e248",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"67a5991e4190f6ed4791d05e07609ca822a9895b92c0fd5f8dfa1acc2203cbd0",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"c060b31fe2bbb0be4d393bc7c40a80848a25b8f0e0f382cb5b49c37bf7476cb4"
],
[
"p",
"3316e3696de74d39959127b9d842df57bddc5d1c7af8a04f1bc7aed80b445088"
],
[
"p",
"4d5ce768123563bc583697db5e84841fb528f7b708d966f2e546286ce3c72077"
]
],
"content": "Thanks, I’m following both of them now, too.\n\nI’ve always had the assumption that a payment for a good/service always has counter-party risk with whoever you’re exchanging with.\n\nSo I would never consider eCash self-custodial, but I’ve always thought of it more like a simplified UX involving an additional party for an already somewhat risky transaction.\n\nYou could give me 10,000 sats from cold storage and I might still run away with the coffee we had agreed I’d hand over in exchange.",
"sig": "8e2bcfac49395231ab771a6d0f00cd92c3e020f0fe7bddcff880375bec00d39f1c039a5b1dd5d0a4ce2964ccafa2abae0aa288721f7608a7fbf302c045f0f9be"
}