Fragment / is on Nostr

MAP Union - Communications Officer
https://www.map-union.org/
pro-c 12+
complex-c below that
MAP (exclusive hebephile BL)
Bipolar / (C?)PTSD

Last Notes

2024-09-08 19:10:43

As much as I want to show love and understanding to everyone regardless of their sexuality, if you're a pro-contact exclusive nepiosadist, I'm sorry but I can't be your political ally.
I don't have a good solution for how you should manage your feelings, either. But I hope you find a way to get through.

2024-09-07 04:17:12

- reply

Non-pedi post concerning youth rights popped up on my feed. I couldn't help but reply to it.
Funny that they distinguished hebephile from pedophile apologism, though!

2024-09-06 11:26:17

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00224499.2016.1271101
"we found that the more participants from the pedohebephilic group tended to give socially desirable responses, the less they agreed with arguments against adult–child sex."
Interesting. Pro-c MAPs are more likely to have pro-social attitudes than anti-c MAPs. Rather than pro-c people being more independent and selfish, it seems they're more interested in fitting in (outside of the obvious exception).

2024-09-05 08:27:06

https://www.map-union.org/blog/perspectives/16-12-pro-reforms-position-on-amsc
Brian and I rewrote the pro-reform 16/12 proposal on AMSC.
The pro-reform position is focused on maintaining a balance of freedoms, responsibilities and protections for MAPs and young people. Obviously, one of the most contentious issues is AMSC (Adult-Minor Sexual Contact). Almost always viewed through the negative lens of child sex abuse, legal definitions of what constitutes criminal sexual contact are highly arbitrary and vary significantly around the world.

2024-09-04 18:21:59

- reply

Now that'd be perpetuating a dox, wouldn't it? 😘

2024-09-04 15:20:49

- reply

Does revealing personal information like this count as doxing?

2024-09-04 09:26:09

- reply

At least the judge is being honest. It's probably true that they care less about children than they do about their idealized conception of "childhood". It is their concept of a childhood of "innocence" and free of sexuality that they are trying to protect with laws against AMSC and PIM.
They'd probably try to ban masturbation if they could. Like Finklehor says about CSA, it took causes moral, but not empirical harm.

2024-08-22 13:21:07

- reply

an article that was only written in response to the MAP wiki article which also contains screen caps.
It seems there are certain members of the community that don't like being held to their own standards.

2024-07-09 13:04:02

- reply

This half reads like a bored housewife's edgier 50 Shades. But assuming it's true, it's actually pretty fucked up. Non consensual SM with an 8 year old. If it is by a bored housewife then it's even more fucked up that she'd try to pass it off as truth.