Susie
Susie Violet

Orwell’s 1984 warned us about this. Surveillance is everywhere, privacy is being destroyed, and CBDCs are the final boss.
The £2 coin quoting ‘Big Brother is Watching You’—is this a tribute, or are they laughing at us?
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/george-orwell-coin-royal-mint-1984-animal-farm-b1204371.html
https://m.primal.net/NeVN.jpg

2025-01-10 15:41:01 GMT

🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: The BBC cannot be held accountable for misinformation.
No right to appeal, no transparency, and the regulator is just another dead end.
For those following the case, here’s an analysis of the BBC’s Stage 2 response, highlighting systemic flaws in how they address inaccuracies:
1/ Conflict of Interest Not Addressed
Flaw: BBC failed to disclose Alex de Vries' affiliation with the Dutch Central Bank, which has a vested interest in undermining Bitcoin.
Impact: Readers lack full context to assess de Vries' credibility.
2/Reliance on a Discredited Source
Flaw: Heavily relied on Alex de Vries' commentary, which has been debunked in peer-reviewed critiques.
Impact: Treated de Vries' work as credible research, perpetuating misinformation.
3/ Failure to Independently Fact-Check
Flaw: Cited similar reporting from other outlets, neglecting their responsibility as a public broadcaster to verify claims independently.
Impact: Undermines the BBC’s editorial standards and trustworthiness.
4/ Freedom of Information Request - Refusal
Flaw: Refused to disclose the fact-checking process under the FOI Act.
Impact: Lacks transparency, raising concerns about their editorial process.
5/ Inadequate Responses to Evidence
Flaw: Avoided addressing detailed rebuttals from the Digital Asset Research Institute (@dari_org).
Key Issues Ignored:
-Misrepresentation of Bitcoin’s energy metrics.
-Failure to consider efficiencies from the Lightning Network.
-Overreliance on outdated methodologies.
-Exclusion of peer-reviewed studies on Bitcoin’s benefits.
Impact: Demonstrates a lack of impartiality.
6/ Breach of Editorial Standards
The BBC violated their own guidelines in three areas:
Accuracy: Relied on discredited sources without fact-checking.
Impartiality: Omitted conflicts of interest and rebuttals, creating bias.
Transparency: Refused to disclose their fact-checking process.
7/ Avoidance of Accountability
Flaw: Avoided engaging with evidence and arguments presented in Stage 1 & 2 complaints.
Impact: Resistance to accountability makes it difficult to challenge inaccuracies.
Summary of the Process Challenges
The BBC’s reliance on flawed justifications, refusal to address rebuttals, and lack of transparency demonstrate systemic shortcomings:
1. Failed to retract or correct misleading content.
2. Ignored conflicts of interest.
3. Failed to adhere to accuracy, impartiality, and transparency standards.
Full Stage 2 response attached.
This process began on 5 December 2023, and over a year later, we are here with no resolution.
This is a clear institutional failure undermining public trust in a taxpayer-funded organisation. The BBC must be held accountable for inaccuracies in their reporting.
The BBC must be defunded.
Full X thread and history here:
https://x.com/decentrasuze/status/1877730630403838011
https://m.primal.net/NagD.jpg
https://m.primal.net/NagE.jpg
https://m.primal.net/NagF.jpg
https://m.primal.net/NagG.jpg
https://m.primal.net/NagH.jpg

2025-01-07 06:58:32 GMT

The FATF Travel Rule, now applied to bitcoin, requires extensive KYC data sharing, causing serious concerns about privacy, financial freedom, and personal safety.
My latest Forbes article featuring @npub1mzn…6mak.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2025/01/07/new-eu-rules-threaten-your-security--what-you-need-to-know/
https://m.primal.net/NVtY.jpg

2024-12-16 06:49:29 GMT

Bitcoin mining powers Europe’s energy transition during crisis by stabilizing grids, using surplus energy, and integrating with renewables, playing a key role in energy solutions.
My latest piece in Forbes.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/12/16/bitcoin-mining-powers-europes-energy-transition-during-crisis/

2024-10-13 08:10:00 GMT

- reply

💕💕💕💕

2024-10-13 07:21:55 GMT

- reply

If other countries are anything to go by, we know how this will play out. They will waste a lot of money, try to coerce the public, it will be used very little, and ultimately fail once they have tried every possible tactic to get people on board.

2024-10-13 06:18:43 GMT

As the UK moves closer to a CBDC, growing concerns about state surveillance are leading to urgent calls for stronger safeguards to protect privacy and civil liberties.
My latest piece in Forbes.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/10/13/uk-faces-privacy-challenges-ahead-of-2025-cbdc-pilot/

2024-10-09 15:41:23 GMT

Day 1 in Amsterdam has been amazing! The Bull Stage is epic, and the lineup was fire. We covered everything from bitcoin mining to the M2 money supply.
@npub1dnz…x52h @npub1art…m0w5 @npub1xap…cnde
https://m.primal.net/LQCJ.jpg
https://m.primal.net/LQCL.jpg
https://m.primal.net/LQCL.jpg
https://m.primal.net/LQCN.jpg

2024-10-07 17:20:13 GMT

“Zaps are wonderful.” – @npub1c87…8avm on Mr. Obnoxious⚡
Yes, they are!! 🙌

2024-10-06 07:27:11 GMT

As bitcoin enters Q4 2024, investors ask: Is this time different?
Global adoption, institutional interest, and supply factors could drive the next market cycle.
My latest piece in Forbes. Big thanks to @npub1r00…sqe8 and the Bitcoin Strategy Platform for allowing me to use their charts.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/10/06/how-this-bitcoin-bull-market-cycle-stands-out/

2024-10-03 19:35:54 GMT

- reply

They are so cool.

2024-10-03 15:16:01 GMT

- reply

Thank you for hosting. The event was 🔥!

2024-09-30 17:47:20 GMT

- reply

Yes, I do. You can’t legally cancel if you watch any TV. I have thought about canceling, but right now it’s not a fight I want to pick.

2024-09-30 16:42:00 GMT

As requested by BBC Complaints, I sent the information by post—amused by dusting off my printer, finding an A4 envelope & queuing at the post office.
While the picture shows me dropping it in a postbox for fun, it was actually sent by recorded delivery.
#note1xyk…gnnw
https://m.primal.net/LGiZ.jpg

2024-09-29 13:10:28 GMT

- reply

I cannot cancel my BBC license, as much as I would like to, because it would still be breaking the law.
As for this BBC complaint… it’s about the journey, not the destination.

2024-09-29 13:07:05 GMT

- reply

I do that too. 💕

2024-09-29 11:02:16 GMT

Going old-school with BBC Complaints—after 10 months of back-and-forth, they now want me to send details by post because their web form has a 2,000-character limit.
Clearly, they’re not ready for Bitcoin. It would be comical if it weren’t so serious.
Here’s a timeline so far:
 27 Nov 2023: It all started when the BBC published an article that confused transactions with payments and exaggerated Bitcoin’s water usage by 1,000x. This misleading report has caused ongoing issues.
More details here:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-67564205
5 Dec 2023: I filed a Freedom of Information (FOI) request asking for details on the editorial process and fact-checking for the article.
21 Dec 2023: The BBC denied my FOI request, citing the journalism exemption in the FOI Act.
10 Jan 2024: I appealed the BBC's decision. They refused an internal review for FOI requests related to "journalism," so I reached out again, asking for guidance to break the impasse. The BBC's response? Contact the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO).
https://ico.org.uk/
19 Mar 2024: Submitted a complaint to the ICO, which handles data protection and FOI issues in the UK, requesting they overturn the BBC's denial of my FOI request because it was in the public interest. ICO Case Reference: IC-295774-D0L0.
19 Mar 2024: Emailed Joe Tidy, the BBC’s Crypto Correspondent, regarding inaccuracies in a Bitcoin article. Joe confirmed he passed my email to Chris Vallance. I offered to assist in fact-checking for accurate coverage.
21 Mar 2024: I reached again to Joe Tidy and now the BBC Press Office, offering them the chance to comment about the misrepresentation of Bitcoin. I specifically referenced the BBC article and asked for their response by 28 March 2024.
18 Jun 2024: The ICO completed their investigation into my FOI complaint regarding the BBC’s article on Bitcoin. They concluded that the BBC is exempt under the "journalism, art, and literature" derogation, meaning they aren't obliged to disclose the requested info.
19 Jun 2024: I emailed Chris Vallance, the author of the BBC article "Every Bitcoin payment 'uses a swimming pool of water,'" to address inaccuracies. After hitting barriers via other channels, I requested a discussion about the editorial process. He never responded.
25 Jun 2024: Received a response from Monica Soriano on behalf of Chris Vallance, redirecting me to BBC Editorial Complaints. This was the first time I’d been told of this option. My previous attempts via webforms yielded no case references and seemed to disappear into cyberspace.
26 Jul 2024: Submitted a complaint to BBC Editorial Complaints via the phone because teh webform was asking for my address. I was told I would receive a response within 10 working days Ref: CAS-7858989-Z7B7B5.
4 Jul 2024: The BBC Complaints team informed me via email that my complaint has been referred to the relevant people and they’re still looking into it. They’ve asked for more patience while they continue their review.
25 Jul 2024: The BBC Complaints team apologised for not meeting their response timeline. They suggested escalating the matter to Ofcom while they continue to look into the complaint.
21 Aug 2024: Escalated my complaint to Ofcom after continued delays from the BBC. Ofcom acknowledged receipt but noted they typically don’t provide individual outcomes. Another deadend.
13 Sep 2024: Received another update from the BBC Complaints team. Due to a high volume of cases, they’ve informed me it will take longer than the usual 20 working days to reply. More waiting, still no resolution in sight.
19 Sep 2024: Received a response from Linda Lewis, a senior journalist at the BBC. She apologised for the delayed reply and defended the article on Bitcoin's water usage, citing their editorial process and impartiality. Despite my concerns, they stand by their reporting. Still no resolution.
https://x.com/DecentraSuze/status/1837045230169694707
22 Sep 2024 - Responded to the BBC Complaints team, questioning why they ignored the evidence I submitted and chose to rely on a discredited source to verify already discredited information. Still seeking accountability.
https://x.com/DecentraSuze/status/1837789045126037657
26 Sep 2024: Partnered with the Digital Assets Research Institute to submit a formal rebuttal. The rebuttal addressed every point raised by the BBC and Alex de Vries, calling for a retraction or, at the very least, an acknowledgment of the misleading claims.
https://x.com/DecentraSuze/status/1839281678964928595
28 Sep 2024: On a Saturday evening, I received an email from BBC Complaints, asking me to submit further details by post. After 10 months of back-and-forth, they now claim they can’t access external Google Drives.
This is 2024, and they want me to send information through the post!
Here’s the irony: After 10 months of delays over a tech issue (Bitcoin), the BBC—a major media outlet—has asked me to send details by post! While Bitcoin pushes tech frontiers, the BBC is stuck using snail mail because their web form can’t handle more than 2,000 characters.
This journey to hold the BBC accountable has been long and exhausting, including countless phone calls not in the timeline, but it's a fight worth continuing.
Transparency and accountability from a public broadcaster are vital. The battle isn’t over yet—who knows how long it’ll drag on.
Watch this space.
#note1ltg…dmy2
https://m.primal.net/LFVH.jpg
https://m.primal.net/LFVI.jpg

2024-09-26 13:05:37 GMT

In ongoing efforts to promote accuracy in media reporting on Bitcoin, I've partnered with the Digital Assets Research Institute (DARI) to draft a detailed rebuttal to a misleading BBC article published on 30 November 2023.
The BBC’s formal response to my complaint showed a disappointing disregard for the substantial evidence and expert analysis provided. To understand the context behind their dismissive reply, you can read the full text here:
https://x.com/DecentraSuze/status/1837045230169694707
The article by Chris Vallance from November 2023 relied heavily on Alex de Vries-Gao commentary, which lacks a foundation in solid research.
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-67564205
The lack of rigor in the BBC’s approach and their reliance on a single, debunked perspective—such as de Vries’s—compromises the integrity of their reporting and spreads misinformation.
https://x.com/DecentraSuze/status/1837045695083082162
DARI’s experts crafted a rebuttal addressing each of the BBC's and de Vries’s points with precision.
We're asking for a retraction of any claims based on de Vries’s debunked work, or at the very least, a public acknowledgment of our concerns.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/1DuMLL7-k556AOIOloUdG5Pzl1OKVFzUU/edit?filetype=msword
The claim that "every Bitcoin payment uses a swimming pool of water" is not just scientifically inaccurate, but also misleading. These types of claims lack methodological soundness.
It has been incredibly challenging to raise this concern, as the BBC has continuously tied me up in bureaucracy.
https://x.com/DecentraSuze/status/1837116608407322660
We’re urging the BBC to correct their narrative and provide a more balanced view of Bitcoin's environmental impact. Media accountability and accurate reporting should remain at the forefront of the Bitcoin conversation.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/09/09/new-research-shows-bitcoin-mining-cuts-carbon-emissions/
https://m.primal.net/LCjW.jpg
https://m.primal.net/LCjV.jpg

2024-09-26 08:36:49 GMT

- reply

Thanks for this. I trimmed it all back yesterday, so I’ll wait for it to regrow and then scan. 😀

2024-09-23 09:57:07 GMT

- reply

💖

2024-09-22 12:39:39 GMT

- reply

Yep! It’s pretty ugly.

2024-09-22 12:20:36 GMT

- reply

For now, the BBC article. The problem with de Vries’ work is that it has spread like a disease.
https://x.com/dari_org/status/1831814510149247391

2024-09-22 10:23:23 GMT

- reply

I hope so, but at the same time, they seem so corrupt, powerful, and arrogant that I wonder if it will have any effect.

2024-09-22 10:22:01 GMT

- reply

I tune in to the BBC from time to time just to hear what they have to say. Once you see past the veneer, it becomes clear that much of what they present isn’t well-researched, isn’t balanced, and is clearly pushing an agenda. It’s state media, and they need to be defunded.

2024-09-22 09:45:07 GMT

Following up with BBC.
Evidence previously overlooked has been resubmitted, and further research will be provided in collaboration with the Digital Assets Research Institute to push for a necessary retraction.
I have requested that the case remain open.
#note15yy…pj7c
https://m.primal.net/KxtP.jpg

2024-09-21 13:45:21 GMT

- reply

Thank you. 🥰
It’s not over. I am going to work with these guys on a rebuttal/response…
https://www.da-ri.org
The article needs to be retracted.

2024-09-21 08:41:23 GMT

- reply

🧡🧡🧡

2024-09-21 08:41:01 GMT

- reply

Hopefully that, and hopefully the people who still think the BBC are credible, will rethink.

2024-09-21 08:40:04 GMT

- reply

🫡

2024-09-21 08:39:43 GMT

- reply

I think there are elements that are by design, but it’s also mixed with a large amount of useful incompetence.

2024-09-21 07:19:33 GMT

- reply

Sometimes I tune into the BBC just to keep an eye on them. Once you see the bullshit, you can’t unsee it. It’s pervasive.

2024-09-20 09:55:08 GMT

- reply

The letter loaded in the wrong order. Please start from the last graphic/picture to read it in the correct sequence.

2024-09-20 09:52:30 GMT

I've had a response from the BBC, and they're doubling down, further proving how difficult it is to hold the BBC accountable for their misinformation.
Here’s a short summary on their response:
Flawed Metrics: The BBC relies on Alex de Vries' debunked "per transaction" metric to assess Bitcoin's environmental impact, despite Cambridge University disproving this methodology as early as 2018. The BBC ignored credible research that highlights the fundamental flaws in de Vries' study, failing to fact-check before publishing.
https://x.com/DecentraSuze/status/1834671256299257876
Misleading Headline: The BBC admitted to using "payment" and "transaction" interchangeably in their headline, allegedly to make it more accessible to readers. However, this distinction is critical—confusing the two leads to gross overestimation of Bitcoin's water use by a factor of 1000x or more. This misrepresentation is not a small error; it's misinformation.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-67564205
Undisclosed Conflict of Interest: De Vries works for the Dutch Central Bank, which has a vested interest in discrediting Bitcoin, yet the BBC did not disclose this conflict. Central banks stand to lose from decentralised finance systems, making de Vries’ affiliation highly relevant and worth disclosing. The BBC dismissed this concern outright.
Impartiality in Question: Despite claiming impartiality, the BBC consistently fails to provide balanced reporting on Bitcoin. This article is just one of many examples, amplifying flawed studies while ignoring counter-evidence and perpetuating a one-sided narrative.
https://x.com/gladstein/status/1803507915556606200
Broken Complaint Process: Beyond the article’s provable flaws, which have been dismissed by the editorial complaints team, I can’t even respond to the email I received. The BBC’s process forces me to deliver responses over the phone, making it more difficult to address these serious issues. Accountability feels impossible.
https://x.com/DecentraSuze/status/1834669804923322843
This isn’t just about bitcoin. It’s about journalistic standards and the integrity of the information that the public relies on. We need to demand better fact-checking, transparency, and accountability from organisations like the BBC.
The links they have provided in support of their response are provided below:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137268
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949790623000046
https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2024-07/ESMA75-453128700-1229_Final_Report_MiCA_CP2.pdf
https://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/guidelines
https://m.primal.net/Kvcx.jpg
https://m.primal.net/Kvcy.jpg
https://m.primal.net/Kvcz.jpg

2024-09-16 14:24:19 GMT

- reply

Fantastic. Thank you. Please keep me posted! ⚡️

2024-09-16 11:19:39 GMT

- reply

I think the thinking behind this business model is that there is already plenty of bitcoin mining information available for free. This way, the film preserves its uniqueness.

2024-09-16 10:58:43 GMT

- reply

Awesome! Not sure if you could tell by my post, but I strongly recommend the film. 😁 😆

2024-09-16 10:51:11 GMT

If you haven't seen Dirty Coin The Movie, I recommend that you do. For those unfamiliar, it's a bitcoin mining documentary that investigates the often misunderstood industry.
https://www.dirtycointhemovie.com
The film dissects environmental debates, energy consumption myths, and the behind-the-scenes realities of mining operations.
It is beautifully crafted and appeals to a wide audience, not just for its cinematic beauty, but for the compelling story it tells and the thought-provoking issues it addresses.
https://youtu.be/mzw3koyXNS4
I've seen it twice and I'll see it for a third time in November. There are screenings worldwide; here is a schedule if you want to see if there is a screening near you.
🎬 Dirty Coin Upcoming Screenings:
📍 Washington D.C.
🗓 Sept 23, 2024
🎟 https://www.eventbrite.com/e/dirty-coin-the-bitcoin-mining-documentary-in-washington-dc-tickets-1002705026727
📍 NYC
🗓 Sept 25, 2024
🎟 https://www.eventbrite.com/e/dirty-coin-the-bitcoin-mining-documentary-pubkey-tickets-1014999941147
📍 Baxter
🗓 Sept 28, 2024
🎟 https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mining-conference-minnesota-registration-880150643267?aff=oddtdtcreator
📍 Montreal
🗓 Oct 02, 2024
🎟 https://www.eventbrite.com/e/dirty-coin-the-bitcoin-mining-documentary-in-montreal-tickets-1013726833247
📍 Amsterdam
🗓 Oct 08, 2024
🎟 https://lu.ma/hapqmiee
📍 South Carolina
🗓 Oct 17, 2024
🎟 https://www.eventbrite.com/e/dirty-coin-the-bitcoin-mining-documentary-tickets-1002460926617
It's so worth a watch, and it won the Best Movie award at the Bitcoin Film Festival in Warsaw earlier this year.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/04/24/bitcoin-halving-party-unites-art-and-tech-at-warsaw-bitcoin-filmfest/
@npub10t6…j94r
https://youtube.com/shorts/u02AQycCBZk?feature=shared
This is not a paid promotion, I’m just a huge fan of the film! 😁⚡️💕
https://m.primal.net/Krgw.jpg
https://m.primal.net/Krgx.jpg

2024-09-15 12:42:27 GMT

- reply

Thank you. I have just replied. ⚡️

2024-09-15 08:42:46 GMT

- reply

Absolutely. Bitcoin is inevitable. 🔥

2024-09-15 08:39:02 GMT

- reply

That comment definitely deserves a zap. 😆

2024-09-15 07:58:49 GMT

I absolutely loved penning my column, “MyTwo Sats,” for CityAM. It was a dream come true to rant about the complexities of money, economics, and how bitcoin could fix it. It was aimed at London’s city workers—from bankers to brokers.
I also had the privilege of collaborating with an incredibly talented (and anonymous) bitcoin artist who transformed my words into art.
This article explores the critical link between energy and money—a foundational aspect of any economy.
By reconnecting money to real-world assets like energy, bitcoin is proposing a theoretical fix and offering a practical pathway to sustainable, fair economic practices.
But I know you guys already get it; hopefully, a few more people in the City of London will catch on now too.
https://www.cityam.com/why-money-should-have-a-direct-and-transparent-link-to-energy/
https://m.primal.net/KqYo.png

2024-09-13 20:23:08 GMT

I submitted a freedom of information request on 5 December 2023. After months of dead ends, the BBC finally referred me to Editorial Complaints on 25 June 2024. I reached out the next day, and was told it would take 10 working days. After following up last week, I was informed it could take an additional four weeks.
This is the article:
https://t.co/o9MQYzN7Xt
And this is how misinformation spreads.
I just want a retraction.
https://m.primal.net/KpBB.jpg
https://m.primal.net/KpBC.jpg
https://m.primal.net/KpBD.jpg
https://m.primal.net/KpBE.jpg

2024-09-13 16:23:15 GMT

- reply

At first glance, I thought that was a dessert! 😁

2024-09-13 11:04:36 GMT

Just wanted to share an exciting update! For those who don’t know me, I’m the Co-founder, Director, and Head of Mining & Energy at Bitcoin Policy UK.
The UK is embarrassingly behind the curve when it comes to bitcoin adoption and mining. To help change that, we’ve been quietly collecting S9s for a top-secret project.
We’re reviewing sites across the UK to develop innovative business models using bitcoin mining. Our aim is to raise funds to create proof-of-concept projects that use stranded energy to power local agriculture and factories.
If you’ve got a few sats to spare, we’d greatly appreciate the support by donating to our Geyser Fund. 🧡⚡️
@npub1kmw…xqk9
https://geyser.fund/project/bpukminingandsustainability
https://m.primal.net/Kofj.jpg
https://m.primal.net/Kofk.jpg
https://m.primal.net/Kofm.jpg
https://m.primal.net/Kofn.jpg
https://m.primal.net/Kofo.jpg
https://m.primal.net/Kofp.jpg

2024-09-12 09:15:13 GMT

- reply

Not entirely sure, but the Mosuo people come to mind.

2024-09-12 08:42:59 GMT

- reply

https://www.cityam.com/why-i-believe-the-bank-of-englands-cbdc-consultation-amounts-to-a-national-scandal/
https://www.cityam.com/is-the-looming-dawn-of-cbdcs-leading-us-blindly-into-a-surveillance-state/
https://www.cityam.com/are-we-genuinely-staying-ahead-of-the-curve-in-fintech-by-blatantly-ignoring-bitcoin/

2024-09-12 08:42:13 GMT

The Silent Attack on British Democracy? My Reflections from the Front Line of the CBDC Debate
As the co-founder, director, and Head of Mining and Energy at Bitcoin Policy UK, I've monitored the development of Central Bank Digital Currencies through countless panels and forums over the last 18 months.
Historically, my calls for a balanced debate on CBDCs were met with scepticism, often dismissed by both The Digital Pound Foundation and the Bank of England, which refused to engage.
However, a shift occurred recently. In July, the Digital Pound Foundation invited my co-founder and Head of Policy, Freddie New ( @npub1wl3…znlx ), to speak at one of their panels. Freddie brought fresh insights to the panel, including Chaumian eCash, emphasising the need for a balanced debate.
Our latest event, "CBDCs: The Silent Attack on British Democracy?" held at The Legatum Institute, brought these issues into sharper focus. David Rennie from the Digital Pound Foundation attended—an act of bravery given the room's unanimous scepticism towards CBDCs. Previously, we had been sidelined from such discussions by the Foundation.
David, while a proponent of CBDCs, shares many of our privacy concerns, acknowledging the issues of media manipulation and the commoditisation of personal data. His openness to our perspectives on privacy was refreshing, though I find it slightly naïve. Individuals like David are well-intentioned, even if influenced by centralised control.
David stressed that the UK's CBDC design is still under discussion. He values programmability and believes it is essential for addressing issues like money laundering. While we diverge on the necessity and potential overreach of CBDCs, finding common ground on many aspects, differing primarily in our faith in the governance systems, was reassuring.
Last night's event reinforced that meaningful dialogue is possible. We must recognise the nuanced positions of individuals like David, navigating complex issues with genuine intent for public good.
David supports a digital pound that is well-designed in terms of its technical, operational, and governance structures. Although I remain sceptical given the track record of other countries and the apparent lack of understanding from our institutions, it gave me hope to see his good intentions.
We will continue to advocate for a financial framework that respects individual liberties and addresses the risks of centralisation. The journey is long, but the dialogue at events like these ensures that all voices, however critical, are part of shaping the future of our financial systems.
CBDCs still concern me deeply, and I will do everything in my power to oppose them. It was reassuring to know there are well-intentioned people on the other side, however misguided.
Through all these discussions and conferences, one thing remains crystal clear to me: Bitcoin is inevitable, and I have no doubt it. None of the proposed solutions even come close to matching its potential. ⚡️
https://www.cityam.com/opinion-the-public-must-be-correctly-informed-over-hunts-roadmap-for-a-cbdc-or-face-the-prospect-of-spycoin/

2024-09-11 12:52:53 GMT

Matriarchies tend to prioritise community and shared power, while patriarchies are typically more hierarchical.
Is there evidence that one produces better societal outcomes?

2024-09-11 12:52:11 GMT

- reply

🧡
Funny you should say that, I’m on my way to a CBDC event now.

2024-09-11 09:15:14 GMT

A year ago, I wrote an article for City AM, raising alarm bells about how children would be used to justify increasing online control under the pretence of protection. I warned that while laws like the Online Safety Bill may seem noble, they pave the way for overreach and the erosion of our freedoms.
Now, with the Australian PM stepping in on similar issues, it’s clear the trend is accelerating. The more we surrender control, under the pretence of convenience or safety, the more we lose—and it's not just affecting us, it's shaping the world our kids are growing up in.
As a parent, I’m struggling with the reality that I’ve handed my kids a dangerous device—a smartphone—one that society has normalised. It weighs heavily on me. The world is so focused on COVID, yet seems blind to the real epidemic: the pervasive influence of smartphones on all aspects of our lives.
I fully appreciate the need for decentralised social media. In fact, when I shared my thoughts on the harms of social media on X, the post appeared to be shadow-banned. I know Nostr plays a key role in the fight against censorship, but how do we protect children from the darker sides of social media on platforms like Nostr?
If it’s solely the responsibility of parents, the next generation of children could be at serious risk.
I’m reminded of how our freedoms are being eroded when I’m forced to use a cash till at the supermarket, realising how we trade away freedom for convenience in every corner of life. We’re slowly surrendering control, and it’s no different with our kids.
We say it’s for protecting children, but our children are far from safe. The dangers are real, and we turn a blind eye. If we stop them from participating in what’s “normal,” they face social isolation.
Yes, parents should take responsibility. But let’s be honest: it’s not happening. So, now what?
Governments claim they’re stepping in to stop misinformation, but we all know who the biggest culprits are—the ones with power.
From the moment my kids were born, my instinct has been to protect them. But how can we say no when homework is assigned through apps and phones becomes essential? It’s a trap. I left my old career because I couldn’t turn a blind eye to what I saw happening, and now I find myself reluctantly accepting the evil of this tech-dominated world.
Even adults struggle to regulate themselves with this tech. How can we expect kids to manage? Parents don’t seem to grasp the magnitude of what’s happening.
We’ve normalised a tech designed to be addictive, bombarding our kids with violence, porn, and unrealistic expectations. Billionaires who design these tools keep their kids away from them—what does that tell us?
This generation is drowning—sad, depressed, and lost. What are we going to do about it?
Parents need to step up. We’re the adults here. The government can’t fix this for us, and expecting them to will only strip away more of our freedoms. I’m genuinely terrified for our kids, and it feels like no one else sees what’s really happening.
From food to information, our entire world is poisoned. Bitcoin might be part of the solution, but that’s a conversation for another day.
How do we protect our children without sacrificing our freedoms? The current system isn’t working—parents are overwhelmed, governments are overreaching, and tech giants are exploiting the very tools that shape our kids' lives.
We need to find a solution, we’re leaving the next generation to navigate a dangerous and addictive digital world alone.
The question I’m asking myself is: ‘How do we ensure our kids grow up safe, informed, and free?’
https://www.cityam.com/i-see-the-online-safety-bill-as-a-digital-double-edged-sword/

2024-09-11 06:30:58 GMT

- reply

I loved our discussions and how thoughtful you were. It made me test my thesis too.

2024-09-09 13:46:31 GMT

- reply

I’m not an expert in this field, but my understanding is that there’s a difference between ‘clean’ and ‘dirty’ CO2. The focus of these studies is on reducing and managing carbon emissions.

2024-09-09 12:56:21 GMT

New studies confirm bitcoin mining’s role in reducing carbon emissions, challenging flawed research and sensational media headlines.
My latest Forbes article featuring research from the Bitcoin Policy Institute and Digital Asset Research Institute. #Bitcoin
https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/09/09/new-research-shows-bitcoin-mining-cuts-carbon-emissions/

2024-09-08 08:46:52 GMT

- reply

https://m.primal.net/KjOJ.jpg

2024-09-04 10:51:32 GMT

- reply

Agreed, but unfortunately, there are large swaths of people who don’t see it.

2024-09-04 10:21:39 GMT

BBC's bitcoin coverage exposes a lack of sufficient fact-checking and reveals bias, raising concerns about its accuracy and accountability.
My latest piece in Forbes featuring BBC @npub1trr…hdpu @npub13lk…lpsy #Bitcoin
https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/09/04/bbc-bitcoin-coverage-raises-concern-over-its-journalism-and-trust/

2024-09-04 04:34:19 GMT

- reply

😉

2024-09-03 07:06:15 GMT

- reply

🧡🧡🧡🧡

2024-09-03 06:30:01 GMT

I’m really glad to see this topic getting the attention it deserves.
We discussed the risks of centralised mining, home mining solutions & innovations in heat reuse tech.
https://youtu.be/PT3Yqx_jDRw?si=92_KsQFruJS18fPP
https://m.primal.net/Kbmw.jpg

2024-09-02 20:33:05 GMT

- reply

Ha .. yeah!! She absolutely SMASHED IT!!

2024-09-02 20:32:34 GMT

- reply

Thank you so much for the zap!!

2024-09-02 20:32:15 GMT

- reply

Wow!! That is amazing. Did you see the men’s final when France won gold, silver, and bronze? The bronze medal was won by her boyfriend. They were buzzing!!

2024-09-02 11:54:24 GMT

- reply

I find it and ping it over. ⚡️

2024-09-02 11:51:02 GMT

- reply

Amazing!! Thank you. 🤩

2024-09-02 11:50:46 GMT

- reply

🤩🙌⚡️⚡️⚡️

2024-09-02 11:50:32 GMT

- reply

😁

2024-09-02 11:50:12 GMT

- reply

Too late!! Already sent them to her. 😜

2024-09-02 11:49:36 GMT

- reply

Woohoo!!🙌

2024-09-02 10:32:58 GMT

My cousin Saya won gold in BMX for Australia at the Paris Olympics! 🥇
Over breakfast this morning, she’s was asking smart questions about bitcoin.
Please show her how cool the Lightning Network is by sending digital gold to a gold medalist?
[email protected]
https://x.com/10sportau/status/1819465303270871049?s=46&t=yTIAh0ALifomfty2grV1eA
https://m.primal.net/KaNV.jpg
https://m.primal.net/KaNW.jpg

2024-09-01 11:49:27 GMT

- reply

🔥🔥🔥🔥
Exactly. The reality is the polar opposite.
🍄🧘‍♀️