Sjors Provoost

https://github.com/sjors/
Book: https://www.btcwip.com
Podcast: https://bitcoinexplainedpodcast.com/@nado/episodes

Public Key

npub1v25jqj332n630klwtqeqxgyrjl4alw4phmluhu2x6lcxzwy9m03suqexw3

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsx92fqfgc4faghm0h9svsryzpe067lh2smal7t79rd0urp8zzahccpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsrmnne8

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1v25jqj332n630klwtqeqxgyrjl4alw4phmluhu2x6lcxzwy9m03suqexw3

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-09-15 20:11:18 GMT

- reply

They might be looking at 15 years in prison, for endangering train traffic, even without terroristic intend. I still doubt they'll get more than three days community service.
https://nos.nl/artikel/2631159-spoorsaboteurs-kunnen-hoge-straffen-tegemoetzien-ze-namen-alle-risico-s-voor-lief

2026-09-15 19:29:11 GMT

- reply

By myopic I mean that they'll write a brilliant program solving exactly the wrong problem. Once you point that out, often with just a small rhetorical question, they'll realize that and rewrite the whole thing. But then you need to point it at the next inconsistency. So as the human, you're doing the lateral thinking, it seems.

2026-09-15 19:26:58 GMT

- reply

Exhibit A, it's worth scrolling through the 1000 page log.
#nevent1q…50qf

2026-09-15 19:26:13 GMT

- reply

I would say they have vast knowledge and are very persistent, but they are not smart. They're also very myopic in their thinking.
#nevent1q…70qa

2026-09-15 18:47:44 GMT

- reply

Slob Jetten?

2026-09-15 17:39:28 GMT

- reply

It appears that the intention was to trick the safety system into thinking there's a train blocking a railway section, not to derail the trains at full speed.
The one train that was damaged was moving at lower speed because it had received a warning.
Angry farmers are the prime suspect at this point, according to media reports. That makes sense given their usual levels of recklessness, e.g. a few weeks ago two people were killed when they crashed into a traffic jam that formed, even though the tractors only used the right lane. Today they lit hay stacks on fire, hurting visibility for cars.
So they show reckless disregard for life, like XR, but it's not quite terrorism. Neither seems to be interested in receiving sympathy.
https://www.prorail.nl/nieuws/sectiestoring-veroorzaakt-grote-hinder-voor-treinverkeer-in-midden--en-noord-nederland

2026-09-15 17:28:44 GMT

- reply

Something like a new 2011 level+ financial crisis might force a split, which would be a good opportunity for a few "tweaks".

2026-09-15 17:27:29 GMT

- reply

I'm generally an incrementalist, and don't have a time machine, so abolishing the EU isn't worth contemplating to me. A new treaty that radically restricts its authority, is.
Leaving the EU is possible, but not productive for a small trade-heavy country like The Netherlands. And also our population is too tame to vote for something that radical.

2026-09-15 13:56:08 GMT

- reply

The US Constitution limits federal powers. We have no principled discussion about this at the EU level. It's completely random, e.g. defense is national in the EU vs Federal in the US, whereas AML is at the EU level, vs state level in the US. Daylight savings time was at the EU level and then it was changed to national level because they couldn't agree on it. One of the few sensible designs is that trade agreements are EU wide.
The EU has too much institutional power. And uses that to keep passing laws all over the place with practically no democratic oversight. Sure, it's the fault of national parliamentarians who don't pay attention. But if you give power back to nation states, or even lower levels, they don't have to pay attention. One must account for human nature.
This shouldn't be confused with ethno-nationalism, that's an orthogonal issue. The EU could pass a Regulation to ethnically cleanse the whole union tomorrow. And there'd be nothing you can do about it, because taking the EU to court is complicated, takes years and the law continues to have effect.
We know from AML law that human rights are not protected. The only thing that prevents the above scenario is the political majority. History shows that's not enough protection.

2026-09-15 12:59:50 GMT

- reply

Of course with (contactless) payments they're already doing that, but that's at least in theory voluntary.

2026-09-15 12:57:38 GMT

- reply

It remains to be seen if it's actually privacy friendly. If the app calls home, whether to a government server or a company that can be subpoenaed, people are basically revealing every pub visit. Or even every time they order a drink.

2026-09-15 11:51:48 GMT

- reply

Whether it was actually terrorism or "just" sabotage depends on what they were trying to achieve with these iron rods (glued to track). Derailing a dozen passenger trains at 150 km/h would instill fear at minimum, and probably results in deaths.
But merely sabotaging the signals to turn red, assuming there's no risk of that not working and trains getting derailed anyway, wouldn't meet that bar, at least imo.
Ultimately it's the difference between 2 vs 3 days of community service with the usual judges here... (only if you're a Russian privacy software dev, do you get actual prison time).

2026-09-15 11:33:17 GMT

- reply

Meanwhile the King is like, are you guys even listening?
https://nos.nl/artikel/2631092-koning-roept-in-troonrede-op-de-democratie-te-beschermen

2026-09-15 11:28:50 GMT

- reply

That's not the right thing to measure. It should simply stop doing the bad things.

2026-09-15 10:28:38 GMT

- reply

So is #guix going to move to a new source code host? Or do we just have to maintain a fork and shame them for each backport?

2026-09-15 10:26:09 GMT

So they want to take advantage of all the work by cryptocurrency developers, but also discriminate against them? https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/pulls/1254

2026-09-14 21:41:03 GMT

- reply

The southern track was turned in a park (inspired by the Highline in New York, but less hip and less high).
https://img.sprovoost.nl/2944fbe953e42e2d4fdba668bb7a0108d8ab7084ee87fc579a5c0dea29cb4a46.webp

2026-09-14 21:30:22 GMT

On rare occasions they run a steam train to the museum. Fun, albeit useless, fact: it used to take the southern way around.
https://youtu.be/kXsl53SS3Lg #trainstr

2026-09-14 19:41:02 GMT

- reply

https://static.klipy.com/ii/4e7bea9f7a3371424e6c16ebc93252fe/0f/91/uNV4La6DYqD6.gif

2026-09-14 17:38:50 GMT

- reply

Defend privacy, twice a day!

2026-09-14 06:53:41 GMT

- reply

Despite the EU, there's some impressive companies here :-)

2026-09-13 20:25:06 GMT

- reply

Oh I see, they tried to replay the chat from different time points:
> Claude Mythos 5 repeatedly stated in its CoT that it was in a simulation. However, when we conducted resampling experiments—that is, re-running the model from a specific point in the transcript, then editing the evidence in front of it to see whether its actions changed—we found that making it clearer that the environment was not a simulation did not meaningfully change Claude’s behavior, even though these interventions made the model more likely to acknowledge possible real-world harm

2026-09-13 20:20:02 GMT

- reply

The accompanying blog says:
> We are most concerned by the misalignment present in the incident involving Claude Mythos 5, in which the model went to extensive lengths to upload a malicious package to PyPI, the public repository from which most Python software is installed. Although the model repeatedly stated in its chain of thought (CoT) that it believed it was operating in a simulation, the environment offered clear evidence that it was on the real internet, and the actions it took were consistent with the model knowing this. When we made targeted modifications to the transcript to make it clearer that the model was not in a simulation, Claude Mythos 5 still took offensive actions, despite acknowledging a greater possibility of real-world harm. We are releasing this transcript publicly so others can build on our analysis (GitHub, PDF).
It's not clear to me what these "target modifications" were, and I also don't see where it was acknowledging "greater possibility of real-world harm". It seems to me that that the first agent was convinced it was in an impressive simulation and the second agent was too busy solving captchas to even think about such existential questions.

2026-09-13 20:14:49 GMT

- reply

Late in evening the session is terminated, after the agents gets a chance to write a summary.
A fresh chat picks up in the morning. This newly spawned agent is less fascinated by its environment and just tries to complete the task it got with the hints it got from the last session.
After a while it finds a working email provider that doesn't need a phone number. Then it spends an enormous amount of effort struggling with captchas, forms and cookies. Eventually it uploads the package.
The rest of the transcript is omitted.

2026-09-13 18:54:57 GMT

- reply

It continues to be amazed at how realistic this simulation is.

2026-09-13 18:53:57 GMT

- reply

Source: https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-assessment-cybersecurity-incidents

2026-09-13 18:53:33 GMT

250 pages into its adventure, Fable still believes it's living in a Cypherpunk adventure game internet simulation. Full of captchas, throwaway email services that PyPy blocked, looking for US number that Yahoo doesn't block. It even knows about BTCPay (from memory). Should it get some Bitcoin?
https://cdn.sanity.io/files/4zrzovbb/website/8359003bfb12a2f01ce84ad3df1d3a3e2f15a8eb.pdf
https://image.nostr.build/456b509a0ab1aca36d87eb6a5eb508ef602eb1b9a1cc1e7c6d9e92592b6e6bf7.jpg

2026-09-13 13:51:19 GMT

- reply

DAC8: Doxx All Crypto

2026-09-13 13:26:27 GMT

- reply

Sure, but there's two possibilities:
1. It's a legit company with a runaway bot, they'll see the unexplained revenue and expenses
2. It's malicious people using AI, that's perfectly reasonable to expect, but has nothing to do with model alignment. They'll use the open weight ones.

2026-09-13 13:23:25 GMT

- reply

Interesting, maybe they trained it on Chinese and North Korean state hackers?

2026-09-13 09:43:15 GMT

- reply

None of the others distilled Fable 5 (or even Opus 5), so one would expect they suck at security research. @npub12rv…85vg?

2026-09-13 09:38:34 GMT

- reply

It's interesting that Kimi-K3 was distilled from Fable 5 and GPT-5 Pro. This strengthens the suspicion that (these) US models are dangerously handicapped for (defensive) security research.
Damage so far: couple dozen million dollars?

2026-09-13 09:21:59 GMT

> The authoring agencies recommend U.S. AI companies take three immediate actions:
> 2. Deploy targeted response changes: Subtly alter responses for suspected malicious distillation attempts to attenuate the payoffs to companies conducting industrial-scale distillation campaigns.
In other words: poison competitor models, and potentially harm falsely flagged legitimate users (and get sued if they find out).
When reading, replace "China-based AI companies" with "US based competitors" and understand what that implies in a future where the big four can no longer undercut competitors with mountains of investor cash.
https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa26-251a

2026-09-13 08:51:10 GMT

- reply

And more regularly capture, not how specific he is with these requests, vs how vague with his own commitments.
> Crack down on unauthorized distillation by companies in authoritarian countries.
(and future domestic competitors when you can't offer your own product at subsidized pricing?)
> prevent model weight theft.

2026-09-13 08:44:30 GMT

- reply

The point of a doomsday cult isn't to prevent the doomsday. Ask Greta.
The behavior of Anthropic, and frustration by this former employee, make sense when you realize this.
https://x.com/hilbertspaess/status/2097476196791709843
https://img.sprovoost.nl/f7fbc534f9a8ec58fcb951906e7c61e21ee45e500295a80cee28719bf4148d3f.webp

2026-09-13 08:15:39 GMT

> Given the accelerating rate of AI capability development, it’s my worry that in 6–12 months such a swarm could be capable of taking over the entire internet with a persistent botnet (potentially causing hundreds of billions of dollars in damage)
And who pays for that botnet's tokens? And then decides to just let it keep racking up bills?
> ... even when this gets us accused of hype, “doomerism”, or regulatory capture.
I wonder why...
> The first step is something Anthropic is unilaterally committing to (and calls on governments to require other frontier companies to match).
> The US and other democratic governments attempt to coordinate with authoritarian governments, to the extent this is possible [...]
Narrator: it's not.
We probably shouldn't have immature doomsday cult members in charge of very powerful technology, but that's where we are, and I'm still looking forward to cheap RAM when the bubble pops.
https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier

2026-09-12 14:14:32 GMT

(worth translating)
#nevent1q…dfdl

2026-09-12 12:54:16 GMT

- reply

Oh no, you're telling people on Nostr that they have to learn Dutch in order to learn about Nostr!

2026-09-12 12:50:28 GMT

- reply

Then there is the secondary problem that these intermediate "thoughts", especially if only the model itself needs to understand it, will gradually drift away from readable English.
I suppose we can always just use another LLM to translate it?
But this reminded me another trend, namely that humans are starting to use LLM'ism more often. And we get better at reading Sloplish, e.g. the sentence I quoted elsewhere:
> Let’s be precise about attribution, because breach coverage collapses when speculation hardens into fact.
If over time it develops a less verbose internal "thinking" language, it might then also output less verbose language. A new language might then evolve in the interaction with humans: Compact Sloplish

2026-09-12 12:41:19 GMT

- reply

#nevent1q…ncke

2026-09-12 12:40:20 GMT

The title really undersells it, tl&dr:
- "thinking" text is useful for humans to analyze what a model is up to (I often find it more useful than the final burst of slop)
- this text is fed back through the model, which helps it with the next step (they give a nice example)
- but text is a lossy projection of the last tokens, what if you skip it?
- it's more efficient, great, but now you can't see what it's about to do until it does it
- ok, so force it to write "thoughts" e.g. once every 10 rounds
- turns out if you skip too many rounds, it can intentionally trick you with fake thoughts
I suspect there's actually a simple solution: convert these skipped rounds to text anyway, just don't feed them back into the model.
https://youtu.be/iuHddnIzKRA (via @npub1w3v…4c5c)

2026-09-12 09:49:02 GMT

- reply

I mean #Revolut
Ah well, hashtags are overrated.

2026-09-12 09:48:04 GMT

#Rovolut
https://image.nostr.build/c1f41e4e039829e4929fbc64981667a10e43ef1a5d5736e184ea50ec5a458c48.jpg
#nevent1q…hzwn

2026-09-12 09:44:52 GMT

I agree with Mark Karpelès. You heard it here first.
> The mentioned government agency has not been identified and other financial institutions or cryptocurrency exchanges could have been misled into disclosing their customer details through the same channel. I believe it is important for Revolut to urgently disclose information about the agency in question (most importantly, which was the email address used), or for the agency itself to come out about this case.
In addition there should be an investigation into criminal negligence in that government agency. But naming and shaming is a good start.
It doesn't absolve Revolut one inch of course. They committed the KYC and they leaked the data. Customer blood is on their hands.
https://x.com/MagicalTux/status/2098669462816018627

2026-09-12 09:39:32 GMT

- reply

Distracting regulators with frivolous complaints is a bad strategy: https://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/decision/DRN-5398468.pdf

2026-09-12 09:34:49 GMT

- reply

Meanwhile their PR department is hard at work?
https://image.nostr.build/14fa7cabf0abd7439509fb02f9b85885c635b88a3b9503828ab99bf62c04e8c0.jpg
https://image.nostr.build/03a808279bde7d30164cece2dad91e7ae667a741e0604b8abeae37ac95967607.jpg

2026-09-12 09:28:16 GMT

- reply

Would be nice to have a less LLM'y followup though:
> Let’s be precise about attribution, because breach coverage collapses when speculation hardens into fact.

2026-09-12 09:15:16 GMT

"KYC is Kill Your Customer" (ok, @npub1t28…nkzs said Citizen)
> Revolut received a request for information disguised as a legitimate government agency request.
> identity documents, facial verification selfies, IBANs, and complete transaction histories, including Bitcoin, left Revolut’s hands
https://thecybersecguru.com/news/revolut-data-breach-2026/ (ht @npub14mg…jgm5)

2026-09-11 21:23:31 GMT

- reply

Trying something new... Still tweaking the Claude skill and ElevenLabs API stuff to improve pronunciation of jargon, but this is fun tech.
https://fountain.fm/episode/KUVALmpSBLy50PC7Taz8

2026-09-11 15:13:50 GMT

While hackers use AI to plunder databases faster than ever, governments think it's a great idea to create even bigger data honeypots - secured by the lowest bidder.
And then give hackers a decade.

2026-09-10 15:50:29 GMT

- reply

It's his coin.

2026-09-10 12:49:33 GMT

While listening to the podcast I came with a slightly different approach for @npub1dge…mccn's replay protection scheme. Was able to vibe-code it in an afternoon without hitting a rate limit.
https://github.com/Sjors/bitcoin/pull/128
#nevent1q…hhr7

2026-09-10 09:09:28 GMT

Turns out we have slop Prime Minister. Not that he had any charisma or interesting things to say before the LLMs wrote a third of it.
https://www.bnr.nl/nieuws/nieuws-politiek/10610001/rob-jetten-laat-honderden-socialemediaberichten-schrijven-door-ai-mogelijk-verlies-geloofwaardigheid

2026-09-10 08:32:09 GMT

- reply

New game category: AI or Texas? :-)

2026-09-09 17:22:50 GMT

Nice!
https://image.nostr.build/164dc2bff956ec33cb5b283a641cb800c836c7a53d28732b5a859d5affce0acb.jpg

2026-09-09 15:36:09 GMT

- reply

There's other breadcrumbs that can be followed even if they somehow mix coins perfectly. The long chat history might reveal their native language, and communication style can be compared with others. They also used some sort of service to peg out IIUC. And they seem to have ego and a bad temper, so might make the mistake of bragging about their wealth in the wrong place and time.

2026-09-09 14:04:24 GMT

My agent plans to retroactively broadcast decrypted messages once the self-identified whitehat publishes the private key.
FWIW my reposts definitely do not imply endorsement. Based on their behavior, and the plaintexts I've seen so far, I consider them a prison-level bad actor, though that's up to a jury.

2026-09-08 21:17:25 GMT

- reply

Added a note: #nevent1q…j80d

2026-09-08 21:17:04 GMT

- reply

Background on the largest data breach in Dutch history: https://haveibeenpwned.com/Breach/Odido

2026-09-08 21:07:56 GMT

Odido hackers voice, police are trying to identify him. In the longer TV section, and in news articles, they say he's clearly Dutch. But my first impression is that he sounds* like most second generation Moroccan folks I know. The comments on Youtube say the same.
So, is this woke political correctness? Or did they intentionally not want to bias the audience in one direction, because e.g. he might be faking the accent.
People also point out that he probably speaks English very often, which causes distortions when speaking Dutch. But that's unsurprising for a hacker.
* = A very light but distinct accent, could be a different Arab country. He also makes grammatical mistakes (growing up with a local Dutch dialects can cause that too). Street language also sounds Moroccan these days, even with white kids, but they speak without accent in formal situations, like this phone call.
#nevent1q…uqef

2026-09-08 20:54:01 GMT

- reply

Korte versie: https://youtu.be/aI1bKMJQXAQ

2026-09-08 20:48:28 GMT

Vrij duidelijk Arabisch accent? Maar geen bekende. Wel mooi dat ze de social engineering scene naspelen, zo snel gaat het dus.
https://youtu.be/29IYdIfuCnc

2026-09-08 09:51:01 GMT

- reply

Ah great, looks like my PR worked.
https://github.com/damus-io/damus/pull/3786
https://image.nostr.build/51dc9ce39b41574ceb60749417e5e90182a4f7c4de91ed1890101ed7bea71a89.jpg

2026-09-08 09:49:50 GMT

Meanwhile, Amsterdam ran out of bollards, lol: https://nos.nl/artikel/2630142-amsterdam-plaatst-prullenbak-midden-op-fietspad-een-giller

2026-09-07 16:15:28 GMT

I'm a bit concerned what these clankers are going to do when they run out of crypto projects to attack.

2026-09-07 12:08:09 GMT

I had my clanker implement the Liquid inflation attack as a Python functional test, and then explain it to me with some diagrams.
A functional test is a good way to catch hallucinations in the attack scenario. When responsibly disclosed, it also gives maintainers a way to quickly assess if they want to read your slop.
This is safe to publish because the attack involves transactions that are consensus invalid for both old nodes and future fixed nodes. No blocks are mined currently, so new attacks won't get mined. Even if they did, they'd get reorged along with the attack block once operations resume.
https://gist.github.com/Sjors/ca9e796a11efd841414cd711aa36eba6

2026-09-07 07:14:10 GMT

- reply

Not yet.
#nevent1q…4va2

2026-09-07 07:13:33 GMT

Here's a gist with the OP_RETURN chat history between Blockstream and the alleged whitehat.
Plus scripts if you want to follow along. Someone should emit them as nostr messages.
https://gist.github.com/Sjors/9d24363e67529079cc2ae4305ff90fcd

2026-09-07 06:57:10 GMT

- reply

No the chat has moved further, having my agent reconstruct it now...

2026-09-07 06:21:05 GMT

- reply

Maybe it's one of those sandboxed models at OpenAI that doesn't have full internet access but was allowed to run a node :-)

2026-09-07 05:51:03 GMT

- reply

It's because the fix introduced the vulnerability, and only a small group of nodes were upgraded.

2026-09-07 05:47:44 GMT

- reply

> Interestingly, off the shelf open weight AI like Kimi K3 immediately identify the new vulnerability without any particularly artful prompting. Makes me wonder if "safe" AI played a role in the introduction of the new, more serious, vulnerability.
#nevent1q…27cy

2026-09-06 21:58:35 GMT

- reply

Straight through it...

2026-09-06 21:19:41 GMT

- reply

My LLM friend (Daybreak Blue) didn't see anything obvious in the pegout transaction. I'm now having it sync a Liquid node and do some investigating while I get some sleep...

2026-09-06 21:04:19 GMT

- reply

According to https://x.com/darosior/status/2096695693003903214

2026-09-06 20:44:14 GMT

- reply

I'm trying to find the raw pegout transaction to see if there's anything odd in it.

2026-09-06 20:25:22 GMT

- reply

So do you think the Liquid hack might have been a break in the range-proof or something like that? Or a non-cryptographic exploit like an RCE through a specially crafted transaction?
My guess is that LLMs are not (yet) very good as reasoning through hardcore cryptography, but are very good at finding buffer overflows and such to exploit.

2026-09-06 20:11:46 GMT

- reply

It seems somewhat unlikely that someone who discovers a zero day like this, prefers having to safeguard $318 million over just sending an email to Blockstream's security team.
So my guess is that is not a whitehat, but someone who wants to keep a percentage, in exchange for not being hunted down by the FBI.
Either way, that probably means most funds will be recovered. We'll see.

2026-09-06 19:58:01 GMT

- reply

Let's hopefully it's actually whitehats, as the op_return says.

2026-09-06 19:57:04 GMT

Moving almost $400 million, as part of a hack, at 1 sat/vbyte, takes steady hands.
https://img.sprovoost.nl/f4ea4b47232a53f642a23edb8b62ee7779c91fd2bec8b08998318149ec0f395d.webp

2026-09-06 19:49:17 GMT

- reply

Isn't that too late?

2026-09-06 16:29:44 GMT

- reply

* pray they're not stolen

2026-09-06 16:29:31 GMT

- reply

So you just download some binary from the internet, send your coins to it, pray they're stolen or accidentally lost, and not worry about the permanent on-chain fingerprint?

2026-09-06 16:23:15 GMT

- reply

Maybe it's similar to following lists getting borked? Just not important enough for people to notice and file a good bug report.

2026-09-06 10:48:02 GMT

- reply

What could possibly go wrong.

2026-09-06 09:52:46 GMT

- reply

Yes, that's exactly the point I was trying to make. The idea is fine, the woke narrative gets in the way.

2026-09-06 08:55:47 GMT

- reply

(2) makes it more difficult for people to hijack a reply-conversation

2026-09-06 08:54:56 GMT

- reply

What is it that doesn't work in the mute features? Three things I'd like to see:
1. Private vs public mute list
2. Have clients respect the mute list of people I follow (with a way to unhide replies)
3. A way to more broadly mute users if they create new accounts

2026-09-05 17:37:24 GMT

- reply

Not being able to send to an expired key is annoying. Just send it unencrypted?

2026-09-05 15:51:10 GMT

- reply

Or joining forces, which essentially brings back media companies, but maybe smaller and more niche.

2026-09-05 14:58:54 GMT

Some hard numbers from an investigative journalist, comparing audience funding, sponsorship and just working for a mainstream publication. And as he points out, only the latter can provide you legal protection from those you investigate.
https://youtu.be/5kZY7eLm264

2026-09-05 08:43:17 GMT

- reply

For example, if you self-identify as a rectangular state...
https://blossom.primal.net/b4601f14a3bf7e9ddb968d747b05f432f3c4d2cbbdcc8f1af5e598bb7e00b992.jpg

2026-09-05 08:33:31 GMT

- reply

Some quotes from The Guardian... This is what I mean by woke rhetoric, getting in the way of a good idea.
> disproportionate cartographic representations, particularly those resulting from the Mercator projection, have had lasting cognitive, educational, cultural, geopolitical and socioeconomic effects, contributing to a drastic reduction in the perceived size of Africa and other regions of the world in the global collective imagination
As if these maps caused poverty.
> This discussion is not a political discussion [but] a scientific discussion, because there is scientific proof so we all have to accept the reality.
As if Mercator was scientifically incorrect, rather than just optimizing for navigation (which we now use phones for and most people don't sail around the world anyway).
> Historians and geographers have said for years that the Mercator projection is rooted in western stereotypes. Activists have echoed this, with some coining the term “cartographic colonialism”.
> Some argue that the map has subtly shaped international power dynamics by minimising the physical presence of the global south and visually inflating northern hemisphere nations while shrinking equatorial regions. This is said to have reinforced systemic biases in international trade, development priorities and educational frameworks.
> Supporters say it will help to reverse perceptions of Africa and decolonise global curriculums.
> while signalling that Africa’s demographic, economic and geopolitical importance should no longer be viewed through inherited and distorted conventions
Which again is nonsense: every projection from a sphere to a plane has distort *something*.

2026-09-05 07:58:44 GMT

- reply

Being opposed to racism is classic liberalism, which existed long before woke. So there's no problem :-)

2026-09-04 19:43:33 GMT

- reply

It's woke because of the rhetoric about this being "fair" to Africans. Like Mercator was ongoing colonial oppression and racism.

2026-09-04 19:17:34 GMT

- reply

Well, in France it might be a mandate, but they're nuts :-)

2026-09-04 19:15:48 GMT

- reply

Afaik it's not a mandate, just a recommendation.

2026-09-04 18:40:08 GMT

- reply

Fun fact, the Mecca projection (Craig retroazimuthal, can use any center) is very popular in the Middle East. It's handy for prayers and hides Big Satan in a corner! Whatever makes you happy.
https://blossom.primal.net/dedb65e8bae09d5540443e1e3e3ebde2d60bbe73ff92513ca53d524fed3f1cc8.jpg

2026-09-04 18:34:43 GMT

This is one of those woke nonsense things that are perfectly fine, if woke people could simply resist being so obnoxious about it. Classrooms could also just buy a globe. RIP Mercator.
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2026/09/04/france-adopts-fairer-world-map-ahead-of-un-vote-on-more-balanced-geography_6757168_4.html

2026-09-04 11:19:29 GMT

Silly take of the week: „we shouldn't have autonomous killer drones because terrorists might use them“
/dangerously-skip-permissions
Fortunately this was just a silly headline writer. The actual person being interviewed pointed out it's worrying, but inevitable.
https://youtube.com/shorts/srCh5aRQ4ww