etxedu
AC

# Com-ste: common stellar
> "Stars exist in a wide range of colors. Many stars are grouped together, often sharing a common stellar history."
Movement focused on creating a fair future, based on ethics, science, education and art. With values such as freedom, equality and solidarity. Considering essentialism, social ecology and respect for all sentient beings, to contribute to the common good. Where everyone can live as they consider best, without negatively affecting another. Seeking the economy of free access and minimum consumption with maximum benefit.
#art #solarpunk

2023-05-27 04:53:17 GMT

- reply

http://nostrfiles.dev/uploads/pRvBi8gc2Oup65941PWb.jpg

2023-05-25 22:31:24 GMT

- reply

Can I get one? 🤩

2023-05-25 16:53:57 GMT

- reply

A primeira coisa seria educar, expor o problema. Ensine o que está errado e por que, muitas pessoas não estão cientes. Em relação à resistência, uma abordagem seria autogestão (priorizando o local), diminuindo (minimizando o uso de recursos) e o comunismo (focando nas necessidades de atendimento e opoyo mútuo na comunidade).

2023-05-25 15:28:07 GMT

http://nostrfiles.dev/uploads/7CcOdryOYKaV77FjPn5s.jpg
Absence of ruler?
Absence of government?
Absence of submission?
#anarchy

2023-05-25 15:07:58 GMT

- reply

They also have the great limitation of depending on the number of people who do. So the main thing would be to educate.

2023-05-24 23:47:01 GMT

- reply

In that you're right, the community is important. In the future with the increase of users I hope that in Nostr we can talk freely and discuss with respect in case of discrpancy.

2023-05-24 17:09:09 GMT

- reply

https://nostr.build/i/9a5386321931fd29da4e6142d88e5090a767b2028c4711cd4cbfa026374da049.gif
#nevent1q…gvge

2023-05-23 23:38:57 GMT

- reply

Something to clarify is that Nostr is a communication protocol that does not depend on Bitcoin, and currently many users have no interest in it or we are interested in others such as Monero. Some of us joined because of censorship on the networks, government control or simply to speak freely. It is a necessity at present that @npub180c…h6w6 has already commented on this.
#nevent1q…36e9
#nevent1q…ysh4

2023-05-23 23:37:13 GMT

- reply

2023-05-23 21:27:01 GMT

- reply

"A medida que pasen los años, cambiarás mucho, amarás lo que odias, odiarás lo que amas, olvidarás lo que te preocupa y te convertirás en alguien que nunca se parece a ti, no te preocupes, es tu alma evolucionando hacia algo mejor.”
#nevent1q…6una

2023-05-23 19:12:04 GMT

- reply

A note.

2023-05-23 15:56:08 GMT

- reply

We're on the same page, it's been nice talking too. 😁

2023-05-23 15:12:28 GMT

- reply

This
https://i.imgur.com/8K0rLok.jpg

2023-05-23 14:56:34 GMT

- reply

Why do you think communism is impossible? It promotes solidarity, mutual support and the satisfaction of needs. Besides, it would just require everyone to work together, on whatever they can and want. With today's technology, many tasks could be automated, which would free the way for leisure. Members who want more than they need, could get it by themselves or exchange it with others who wish to do so; those who do not want to collaborate, could not do so understanding that they would not get that benefit from the community.

2023-05-23 00:41:18 GMT

- reply

Thanks a lot for the information, it's nice to have a space to chat. Since this current conflicts with historical anarchism, for example, all the authors you mention were against private property. Since capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of productive goods for the creation of goods or services for commercial purposes; and liberalism (classical) is a philosophy that defends individual freedoms, private initiative, free market economy and the limitation of state powers. It would be appropriate to call it anti-state capitalism or radical liberalism. One detail is that in practice these positions could coexist in their communities, since both defend freedom of choice and, therefore, both are against state oppression.
https://media0.giphy.com/media/UvR0ajtt8xOzQCMnN0/giphy.gif

2023-05-22 23:11:24 GMT

- reply

Why the nineteenth century? I understood that this political current appeared during the second half of the twentieth century within libertarianism.
Source: Ronald Hamowy, Editor, The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism, SAGE, 2008, pp. 10-12, p. 195

2023-05-22 03:57:22 GMT

- reply

El mejor truco de vida para la felicidad: Trabaja en la mierda que importa.
No importa en lo que trabajes, enfrentarás luchas, días de mierda y (si tienes suerte) tendrás algunos momentos gloriosos.
Si vas a hacer el trabajo, haz que cuente como algo que empuja al mundo hacia adelante en la dirección que crees que debería ir. Hará que las partes duras se sientan menos duras y hará que la gloria sea mucho más dulce.
#nevent1q…gy77

2023-05-22 02:18:44 GMT

- reply

"Durante el último medio siglo de computación en red, un péndulo ha estado oscilando entre la computación del lado del cliente y del lado del servidor. Pasamos de mainframes y terminales tontos a potentes computadoras de escritorio, aplicaciones web y la nube. Quizás comencemos a ver un péndulo similar en esta arena también. Hemos pasado de un mundo en el que los protocolos dominaban a uno en el que las plataformas centralizadas controlaban todo. Llevarnos de vuelta a un mundo donde los protocolos son dominantes sobre las plataformas podría ser de gran beneficio para la libertad de expresión y la innovación en línea.
Tal movimiento tiene el potencial de devolvernos a la promesa inicial de la web: crear un lugar donde personas de ideas afines puedan conectarse sobre diversos temas en todo el mundo y cualquiera pueda descubrir información útil sobre una variedad de temas diferentes sin que se contamine por el abuso y la desinformación. Al mismo tiempo, podría permitir una mayor competencia e innovación en Internet, al tiempo que brinda a los usuarios finales un mayor control sobre sus propios datos y evita que las corporaciones gigantes tengan demasiados datos sobre un usuario en particular.
Pasar a protocolos, no a plataformas, es un enfoque para la libertad de expresión en el siglo XXI. En lugar de confiar en un "mercado de ideas" dentro de una plataforma individual, que puede ser secuestrado por aquellos con intenciones maliciosas, los protocolos podrían conducir a un mercado de ideales, donde la competencia se produce para proporcionar mejores servicios que minimicen el impacto de aquellos con intenciones maliciosas, sin cortar su capacidad de hablar por completo.
Representaría un cambio radical, pero que debería considerarse seriamente."
Fuente: Protocolos, No Plataformas: Un Enfoque Tecnológico para la Libertad de Expresión
- MIKE MASNICK, 2019
https://knightcolumbia.org/content/protocols-not-platforms-a-technological-approach-to-free-speech
#nevent1q…hjgx