nobody / nobody is on Nostr

"c52f97d87e16f1c6c47de3eba31a429c53c68d3bbbf90b8eed5b2d502b6e310fd3836db1c23dee231ef674fc2dfb50fe75d812bc1a44de8a01dc8a9225249c3a"

Last Notes

2026-06-30 13:47:31 GMT

- reply

You guys just closed my Bringin account out of the blue.
Now what?
https://blossom.primal.net/8e4c524917a3b6195f46e8a07e9ecce71a75377cac6cec03d06d24692dc3046c.png

2026-06-26 07:41:05 GMT

"People were priced out of owning a home, then sold a lifetime of monthly payments as if that was progress." — @nprofile…g4xq

2026-02-27 17:16:29 GMT

- reply

One more good explanation just dropped
https://youtu.be/JJwwVcdHlV0

2026-02-26 21:19:27 GMT

- reply

Ah, they used paper Bitcoin, that explains:
https://youtu.be/QW1YSktWBLQ

2026-02-26 10:41:24 GMT

- reply

It's surprising how easy it is to have an algorithm capable of gatekeeping the price of the best-performing asset globally. 🤔

2025-10-20 13:06:05 GMT

- reply

The biggest issue is that it doesn't let one delete their posts nor does it respect deleted posts.
NIP-09

2025-09-30 12:52:57 GMT

- reply

The bridge is from today’s reality - where most major expenses are still in fiat - to a future where you can pay directly in sats.
Pledging BTC just to borrow fewer BTC back makes no sense. The point of BTC-denominated credit isn’t to shrink your stack, it’s to escape fiat liabilities - first by repaying fiat loans in sats, and eventually by borrowing sats against non-BTC collateral in a true BTC economy.
It means you can borrow fiat if needed, but settle repayment in BTC at the agreed value - avoiding ballooning fiat liabilities, forced conversions, and escalating AML friction. Until salaries, property, and daily life can be settled directly in sats, that bridge matters.

2025-09-30 12:35:16 GMT

- reply

The bridge is from today’s reality - where most major expenses are still in fiat - to a future where you can pay directly in sats.
BTC-denominated credit means you can borrow fiat if needed, but repay in BTC at the agreed value - so you’re not stuck with ballooning fiat liabilities or forced conversions.
It’s not about pledging BTC just to get less BTC back - it’s about creating a credit market native to Bitcoin that avoids fiat rails, stablecoin chokepoints, and AML escalation.
Until salaries, property, and daily life can be settled in sats, that bridge matters.

2025-09-30 12:06:34 GMT

- reply

The bridge is from today’s reality - where most major expenses are still in fiat - to a future where you can pay directly in sats.
BTC-denominated credit means you borrow and repay in BTC, not fiat, so your liabilities don’t balloon with every refinancing.
It’s not about pledging BTC to get less BTC - it’s about creating a credit market native to Bitcoin that avoids fiat rails, stablecoin chokepoints, and AML escalation.
Until salaries, property, and daily life can be settled in sats, that bridge matters.

2025-09-30 06:04:25 GMT

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/6e7c43156649283ffe9d24d4dc0af9eb29851d2089f43260a0e182c1e1394e30.jpg

2025-09-29 22:40:29 GMT

- reply

If stealth is mainly to keep gangsters away, then you must be in a pretty high-crime environment - which raises its own question: why is crime higher there in the supposedly better new country you chose?
And about those “195 countries” - in reality, only a small fraction, maybe 10–20, are truly safe, civilized, and comfortable for raising a family with low crime and strong protections.
As for BTC-backed loans, they don’t solve the taxman or gangster issue.
You still need to show the loan agreement as the source of funds, and loans aren’t free - they come with interest.
If it’s just to fund expensive stuff, what exactly are you paying it back with?

2025-09-29 19:32:32 GMT

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/129b5752b487b6e8c5a34c4f6afa71f3f9ecc296498dfe77ef8feeeb2684c94e.jpg

2025-09-29 15:52:50 GMT

- reply

"Quietly opting out" sounds principled, but it's fragile in practice.
Tax authorities track mismatches between declared income and visible lifestyle - rent, utilities, travel, card use - and that's what triggers audits.
I don't deny the state's failures, but lawbreaking isn't a sustainable solution.
If my name looks real, that doesn't mean it's my legal name or mine.
It also doesn't rule out me having other pseudonymous identities.
People naturally prefer real names and photos.
That's why Snowden didn't hide - an anonymous account would have been ignored.
Sure, there are many valid reasons for pseudonyms: dissent under repressive regimes, protecting family or employees, or just valuing privacy.
But if the only reason is avoiding taxes, that's not real life, that's Sims - unless you're fine keeping a low profile your entire life just to avoid taxes.
The moment you want a better house than Sims, AML/KYC will ask for the source of funds.
Even if you buy property with BTC, your name goes into the register, and the mismatch with your tax declaration will trigger the authorities.
It's better to fight outside prison bars than from behind them. Freedom isn't about hiding, it's about living.

2025-04-15 09:30:36 GMT

💈Finally paid my barber in Bitcoin ⚡ Took me nearly two years to make it happen...
#OrangePilled