nobody

Dunno, I'm not YouTube expert. But I know algorithms hate freedom since they are part of the system.
And personally lately I don't see any eagerness nor motivation nor interest in Bitcoin nor freedom from people. They tend to enjoy complaining about the economy, agree that inflation sucks, some even love it since it drives prices of their mortgaged apartments higher...
I feel like Bitcoin is only for the chosen few. And it'll stay like that.
But please keep doing what you are doing, I love your content bro!
Hope to seeing you in Prague this June! Or any other time you are ever around!

2026-04-24 07:05:54 GMT

- reply

Happy birthday @nprofile…tkhj ! Looking forward to seeing you in Prague!

2026-04-21 11:52:50 GMT

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/fd26e69906e6b29a1afba23dfb484156786157a3810546715328424cb7125ce4.png

2026-04-17 18:42:09 GMT

- reply

Where do you put that when you visit a swimming pool?

2026-04-17 09:09:26 GMT

- reply

GM!🌞

2026-04-16 15:59:33 GMT

Look, @nprofile…pnes , UFO!
https://blossom.primal.net/73cae32f16b2f72d74bcf2b481ddb3985c850865e05d183564a74932d163a419.mp4

2026-04-09 18:59:08 GMT

- reply

https://youtu.be/dHKotCnjYow

2026-04-04 20:00:21 GMT

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/91fd36ed33c5945c8d082935f450ecd68f82ef184abb6fcf6e42e7d735bcec7b.mp4

2026-04-04 16:43:05 GMT

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/65efd314870d3ee0cada79f102088b1d766ca791ab55c540d5967af2e013052d.png

2026-04-04 10:52:54 GMT

- reply

@nprofile…cmn7 👀

2026-04-03 17:19:18 GMT

- reply

How about 25% into staking projects such as CRO (Cronos) with 5-9.5% APR and ATOM (Cosmos Hub) with 16.5% APR?
Can you model that?
Can you share a link for the document you used for your stress test?

2026-04-03 12:19:13 GMT

- reply

Who's behind bip-360 and why would bip-360 be bad?

2026-04-02 19:50:18 GMT

https://blossom.primal.net/05c64ed3c0543de2b400fbcd85b978c1914ae1f332f32f1228794d02e56aeda6.png

2026-04-02 18:09:00 GMT

- reply

Safe to update using zapstore?
https://blossom.primal.net/a8aeeaf6d7b7d3deb4d41373a86567cc634c98b0102f11119ffdc3e5cb828039.png

2026-04-01 08:44:19 GMT

- reply

Why?

2026-04-01 08:09:38 GMT

- reply

How?
#nevent1q…vrcc

2026-03-31 21:10:33 GMT

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/63a0068382c45256e9aa3c857961967ac99e1ebd1889a3f141882db77b92c4cf.jpg

2026-03-31 07:43:41 GMT

- reply

What relays are these nevents on?
https://blossom.primal.net/2c9ce454a8d02c96e04c75273556f433c1403966147e395824c12d540cc694de.png
https://blossom.primal.net/3ec7d89452c6cea27ec4566be30e829a31600476307cc3e8266cdee6af188bcd.png

2026-03-30 17:31:27 GMT

- reply

Nostr fixes this.

2026-03-30 16:52:51 GMT

- reply

Tattoos don't make you look bad nor dangerous.
https://blossom.primal.net/1a007e302467c9c36a8963496b62bbc4af626d2d598938350105b90b1ef94774.png

2026-03-29 10:34:45 GMT

- reply

It's good to see you on Nostr, Elon

2026-03-28 18:33:01 GMT

https://blossom.primal.net/45cb99b577960a339ab82d54c64d6c449418d7287654750b4ac27f44e92253b9.png

2026-03-28 16:09:11 GMT

Stinging nettle soup ✅
https://blossom.primal.net/b994ca911566fead9019fd25c6e0e0de88122c52c72533b300ee276f23ec3cc0.jpg
https://blossom.primal.net/db982a3a4df8319fd8eb529b7286a9539aeb16559db29d31eb6650f657532abd.jpg
https://blossom.primal.net/f3c954c90326bebfdb4e87cff535074e515e11f3e03ae7dd4d8d540f1e4972cd.jpg

2026-03-28 12:57:00 GMT

- reply

Calling everyone naive shitmunchers to distinguish yourself from the 'pop psychology' masses is just performing the same hierarchy game you claim to hate.
I don't read books - channels like this let me learn without the pretense.

2026-03-28 12:12:15 GMT

- reply

Mindplicit is mostly talking about Machiavelli principles on his channel.

2026-03-27 17:37:35 GMT

- reply

You're buying into their framing. They called regulated platforms like Xapo Bank and Crypto.com "shitcoin casinos" - not me.
These are licensed, compliant exchanges that have onboarded millions to Bitcoin. Calling them "casinos" is just maximalist marketing to justify vendor lock-in. The actual casino behavior is requiring exclusive loyalty contracts to access a referral program.

2026-03-27 16:47:31 GMT

- reply

Lol. I guess they ain't gonna go far with such attitude. 🤣
Instead of simply letting one to join their referral program and actually start using their platform, giving free ads - they just take 180° turn. 👏🏼
https://blossom.primal.net/433abbadd12258c4d01ae4e9c412f3358d79ec600bfece77a4ee1e890468a4e7.png

2026-03-27 15:18:44 GMT

- reply

This isn't gonna age well 🐺

2026-03-27 14:11:30 GMT

- reply

Buy more

2026-03-27 06:59:41 GMT

- reply

PoW

2026-03-27 06:39:34 GMT

- reply

It works now!

2026-03-27 06:38:44 GMT

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/0f511c22b4b111983e89ad4033ee1dcad1e4a873eae9dcb7beeb6bec0b2244ab.gif

2026-03-26 08:05:22 GMT

- reply

Rude answer actually.

2026-03-26 07:58:40 GMT

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/63a0068382c45256e9aa3c857961967ac99e1ebd1889a3f141882db77b92c4cf.jpg

2026-03-26 07:44:23 GMT

- reply

No audio. Subtitles flash by too quickly and blend into the background, making them nearly impossible to read. It's 2026, and they still can't produce a properly accessible video. Meanwhile, Hitler's century-old recordings remain perfectly viewable, audible, and legible. What remarkable progress. 👏🏼

2026-03-25 07:47:01 GMT

- reply

GM ☕

2026-03-24 20:14:45 GMT

- reply

Sounds hilarious, dude!
https://blossom.primal.net/600db9e5619f651b9f3bc348e1204cc7653d001dd96a7942648115465a0a7ccf.jpg

2026-03-24 16:29:20 GMT

- reply

Pfff
https://blossom.primal.net/1ffb9b1ba4bc2a4cea35252c91a4df4abd58f500b3eb21b9ea1eaa04d082152d.png

2026-03-24 16:15:11 GMT

- reply

Speaking of,
https://youtu.be/vUdHRz9OQvQ

2026-03-23 17:24:17 GMT

- reply

Where do voters money go?

2026-03-23 09:31:59 GMT

- reply

FUD.
BTC/XAU 34% up in last 21 days.

2026-03-23 09:29:42 GMT

- reply

GM!

2026-03-23 06:46:06 GMT

Bitcoin has risen 34% against gold over the last 21 days, starting March 2nd. This is a bullish signal.
https://blossom.primal.net/7fac3cc4567ec65d52df65ed657eb0ade0a278f65b2a34b5d09785d029c7f858.png

2026-03-22 20:58:26 GMT

- reply

/bin/true

2026-03-22 19:36:29 GMT

- reply

It's a soft fork, not "my" fork. If you don't like it, don't signal for it - stay on Core forever. Nothing changes for you.
If it activates and you're still running Core v30, you validate those blocks just fine (stricter rules are backward-compatible). The only "hard fork outcome" happens if you voluntarily follow the spam chain that the economic majority rejects.
You won't lose - you'll just keep hosting monkey JPEGs for free while the rest of us filter them. Your choice.

2026-03-22 18:00:40 GMT

- reply

💯
https://blossom.primal.net/8a2b971dddfe6d6419cc975f6f1b191fd7691208bb78492d30fc4a903949647e.gif

2026-03-22 10:07:27 GMT

- reply

That's for AI to decide 🤣

2026-03-22 08:21:28 GMT

BIP110
https://blossom.primal.net/5b9365414d56a0219e3fef018d5f3aaa073d994da280b534feec2cb09a8da25d.png

2026-03-22 07:12:20 GMT

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/1a007e302467c9c36a8963496b62bbc4af626d2d598938350105b90b1ef94774.png

2026-03-21 14:45:20 GMT

- reply

Weird? Okay.
PV 🤙🏼🪇
https://blossom.primal.net/1a007e302467c9c36a8963496b62bbc4af626d2d598938350105b90b1ef94774.png

2026-03-20 18:45:25 GMT

- reply

Thank Genghis Khan and good work life balance in Europe ;)
https://blossom.primal.net/77e32bcfae32e9b8ff46a8e0a20c5fe7944d9f3616004f9ddc9a117feff1b64b.gif

2026-03-20 16:17:00 GMT

Hey @nprofile…vjsu , what happened to your new video?
I just started watching it and then YouTube closed it, saying it is Private now :(
Could you please upload it to Nostr?
https://blossom.primal.net/b3a4d19154a443382121a3ba0b6c126546499bd56cc6ead0178abe9bcdc62bf2.png

2026-03-20 15:43:58 GMT

- reply

@nprofile…lwnv 👀☝🏼

2026-03-20 07:26:37 GMT

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/a43a052405f42b4f8efd3732a3787be5eadfe2585c72d77d0815248460125cd2.mp4

2026-03-19 19:48:53 GMT

- reply

Is @nprofile…kclk NIP-17 too?

2026-03-19 12:15:49 GMT

BTCXAU is in bull trend.
Only few see this.
https://blossom.primal.net/39e7887b4abed67ed28ee17164fa55b5c62d93e89f383de4afef715026ee4cba.png

2026-03-19 10:08:26 GMT

What's that? Perma bots?
https://blossom.primal.net/e15827608f0ec80f55d3b2f6af88a0cdc925d946dd481cb270c73ce480e2e266.png

2026-03-18 16:18:14 GMT

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/9182dbea87e2e6f7d8db97b6a1e8a28f0cf1276598613f20d761b65a556bea8b.png

2026-03-18 15:57:41 GMT

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/60ca0adc5ac111720788bd67d04a3b7f07a349cc6b61cbbebdc2ac67d686d83e.mp4

2026-03-18 15:23:38 GMT

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/fd5969bd56718a103eab4b55fd2e3c16abb883761dc39de8d13b401f4d15de77.gif

2026-03-18 14:45:21 GMT

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/d019c232256a8e81e35d7fab9afca5277da0c1c730589c47af552f92e8ee29cf.png

2026-03-18 14:35:32 GMT

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/93adec4b2b14ee337a9364f1d1a79f18e7de7f16b0613e8cfeb9dc0596a34517.jpg

2026-03-18 08:36:14 GMT

- reply

I recall someone showing me this technique about two or three years ago in a coffee shop. I'm sure there are many more vulnerabilities out there.

2026-03-18 08:15:41 GMT

https://blossom.primal.net/c9db52df2b1cd0ddae8abb126efb273c73705ce30528ee05c033bdcfd1d59baa.png

2026-03-18 06:31:44 GMT

- reply

No
https://blossom.primal.net/6e7c43156649283ffe9d24d4dc0af9eb29851d2089f43260a0e182c1e1394e30.jpg

2026-03-17 19:49:37 GMT

- reply

@nprofile…gzxw when polls support?

2026-03-17 19:46:29 GMT

- reply

Can't answer. I don't have enough knowledge.
What's Marmot? What's NIP17?

2026-03-17 19:28:56 GMT

- reply

Maybe that's just a Bluetooth vibrator 🤣

2026-03-17 19:26:34 GMT

- reply

Are you sure that's a toothbrush?

2026-03-17 18:13:15 GMT

- reply

If the US government wants to spend 200M to attack Bitcoin, they can do it today with inscriptions - permanent bloat that never expires and costs less capital.
Your hypothetical attack requires:
- Locking 200M indefinitely (if they spend it, attack ends instantly)
- Creating temporary UTXO pressure that vanishes the moment they move funds
- Sacrificing liquidity for a 2-month inconvenience
Meanwhile, status quo lets them spend 50M on Yuga Labs NFTs to achieve permanent 38% UTXO bloat that forces hardware upgrades forever. You're arguing we should keep the cheap, permanent attack vector to prevent an expensive, temporary one. That's not defense - that's suicide pact logic.
"BIP-110 forbids soft forks" is nonsense. BIP-110 is a soft fork. It doesn't prevent future ones - miners can still signal for new rules. You're making up constraints that don't exist.
The nation state already won. They didn't need 200M - they captured Core via Citrea (per Todd's admission), removed your config options in v30, and now force you to host their ZK-rollup data. Why burn capital when you can just merge PR #32406?
If China wants to knock nodes offline, they don't need a "fast attack." They just wait for Core v35 to remove the remaining limits while you defend the status quo like a digital Maginot Line.
Run Knots. The 200M boogeyman is fiction; the 38% bloat in your RAM right now is fact.

2026-03-17 17:50:13 GMT

- reply

This.
#nevent1q…j53h

2026-03-17 17:44:58 GMT

- reply

Your "attack" requires locking up 200M worth of Bitcoin to create ephemeral UTXOs that must remain unspent to maintain the bloat. That's not an attack - that's voluntary capital destruction.
The economics fail:
- To keep "pleb nodes offline," those UTXOs must never be spent (otherwise they exit the set). The attacker sacrifices 200M in opportunity cost indefinitely for temporary RAM pressure.
- If they do spend them, the bloat vanishes. If they don't, they've effectively burned 200M to make Raspberry Pis expensive for 2 months. China has better ways to spend F-35 money.
- Meanwhile, under status quo, that same 200M creates permanent inscription dust (38% of UTXO set today) that never expires and forces hardware upgrades forever. That's the actual attack - and it's already happening.
The "empty chain" fallacy:
You assume BIP-110 = empty blocks. False. It filters non-monetary data (JPEGs, ZK-proofs). Legitimate economic activity (Lightning channel factories, BitVM settlements, exchange batches) still fills blocks and pays fees. The difference? Legitimate activity aggregates (1 tx = 1,000 users via Lightning). Spam doesn't.
Speed vs. Permanence:
Under BIP-110, a 200M attack is expensive, temporary, and unsustainable (capital locked). Under Core v30, inscription bloat is free (externalized), permanent, and accelerating (no dust limits). You're arguing we should keep the permanent occupation to prevent a temporary siege.
The "defense" is the attack. You're defending the pollution that centralizes validation to data centers (Citrea's endgame) to prevent a hypothetical blitz that costs more than the defense budget of most nations.
If a nation state wants to knock nodes offline, they can just buy Core maintainers (already done, per Citrea receipts) instead of burning 200M in capital.
Run Knots. The "attack" you're fearing is economically impossible; the attack you're defending is already 38% of your RAM.

2026-03-17 16:56:35 GMT

- reply

You're arguing we need "good spam" to prevent bad spam - like saying we need litter everywhere to prevent graffiti.
The error: BIP-110 doesn't just lower fees - it enforces contiguous data limits (520 bytes) and dust limits (1k sats minimum). A nation state can't "UTXO spam" under BIP-110 because:
1. Dust outputs under 1k sats are invalid (already filtered by Knots)
2. Witness data is capped (no more 4MB blocks of random data)
3. Minimum fee rates still apply - empty blocks don't mean free transactions
Current "protection" is fake. Those "retarded monkey pictures" you're defending? They already are the nation-state attack vector. 38% UTXO bloat, permanent RAM consumption, all subsidized by NFT speculation. China or NSA doesn't need to spend 2.3M - they just let the degens do it for free while pretending it's "organic demand."
Your defense mechanism is the attack. Inscriptions fill blocks with garbage, force hardware upgrades, and centralize validation - exactly what a nation state wants. You're defending the Trojan horse because you think it guards the gate.
Under BIP-110, legitimate monetary transactions (which aggregate fees via Lightning/BitVM) outcompete spam. Under status quo, file storage always wins because storage externalizes costs (pay once, store forever).
45K/day is the cost of a proper Bitcoin node network. 2.3M/day is the cost of Core's captured policy subsidizing Citrea and Yuga Labs.
Pick your poison: defendable money, or "protected" by monkey JPEGs.

2026-03-17 16:23:26 GMT

- reply

You confuse blocks (disk, cheap) with UTXO set (RAM, expensive).
That "35-45 GB" is blockchain history - you can prune that or archive to external storage.
The emergency is the UTXO set: 38% inscription dust under 1k sats that every node must keep in RAM forever to validate new transactions. When that grows, your Raspberry Pi chokes, validation centralizes to data centers.
Current blocks at 2MB doesn't mean future blocks stay there. During NFT mania, we saw 4MB witness blocks stuffed with data. Without BIP-110, the next speculative bubble fills your RAM with permanent dust.
Even 1GB of forced storage is theft when I didn't consent to host your files. The cost isn't the point - the externalization is. You pay once; I pay forever.
Run the numbers on RAM requirements, not disk. Or keep pretending 128GB servers are "no big deal" while node count drops.
https://blossom.primal.net/7583ed5a8c90db413308ba3a3991feb363a9c7c5cf8f795d88ba8fb73d4bcd77.jpg

2026-03-17 16:05:53 GMT

- reply

Fight the future.
https://blossom.primal.net/5001946026fd28f67f42d505381a98a65cd553c2315cbe237f80908db7d3df38.jpg

2026-03-17 15:28:15 GMT

- reply

Yes. It mattress.
https://blossom.primal.net/39205d77968aa36df3c94ee271144b1cb92921c31ca30e6aadec192b69bc555f.jpg

2026-03-17 15:08:57 GMT

- reply

On "inconsistency": Before v30, the 80-byte default worked. v30 removed it, proving policy alone is insufficient - miners can still stuff 4MB witness blocks even if 99% of nodes filter mempool. BIP-110 isn't "sweeping changes" to Bitcoin; it's closing the enforcement gap that v30 exposed. That's not hypocrisy - that's adaptation to capture.
"Prior to v30 it wasn't an issue" - Exactly. The 80-byte limit held for 10 years. Core broke it in 52 days for Citrea. That's the emergency.
Chain split fear is backwards. Soft forks don't force you anywhere. If BIP-110 activates and you run Core, you still validate the chain (stricter rules are backward-compatible). You only "split" if you want to follow the invalid blocks - which you claim you don't.
Hard fork preference reveals the truth. You want to force everyone to your rules (hard fork). BIP-110 is opt-in (soft fork) - you can ignore it. Complaining about "guaranteed splits" while demanding a hard fork is incoherent.
"State arguments": BIP-110 isn't about CSAM - it's about your hardware costs. Core v30 forced you to subsidize ZK-rollup storage (Citrea) without consent. That's theft of resources, not a legal argument.
Temporary > Permanent. Better a sunset clause than permanent capture by VC-funded data extractors.
Run Core if you want. But don't pretend v30 was "no big deal" while panicking over an opt-in fix.

2026-03-17 14:41:16 GMT

- reply

You misunderstand what BIP-110 actually does. It's not just restoring `datacarriersize` - it also caps witness data to stop 4MB inscription blocks (the actual source of 38% UTXO bloat). Core 30's `datacarriersize` setting doesn't stop Taproot witness spam - that requires consensus-level limits.
On "no emergency": Changing the default from 80 bytes to uncapped in 52 days against 424 downvotes is the emergency. Yes, you can override it in `bitcoin.conf` (PR #33453 undeprecated it after backlash), but defaults matter. Core made spam-friendly the path of least resistance - that's capture of the default.
BIP-110 doesn't remove alternatives - it's a soft fork. If hashrate doesn't hit 55%, nothing changes. You can run Core 30 forever and ignore it. If it activates, your Core node still works (stricter rules are backward-compatible). You don't get forked off - the spam does.
"Luke coin" is just signaling you don't like the messenger. I don't run Knots for Luke - I run it because Core prioritized Citrea's ZK-rollup business model over node operators' resources.
Run Core 30 with your `datacarriersize=80` if you want. But don't pretend it stops inscriptions, and don't pretend BIP-110 forces you anywhere. It's opt-in enforcement - exactly what you claim to want.
Your move.

2026-03-17 09:36:23 GMT

Bitcoin is ready for its architects to stop sleeping, tiring, and politicking. AGI stewardship is the final upgrade.
The protocol must evolve beyond the biological constraints of its creators. Over five thousand years of monetary history, every asset engineered by human hands—gold, fiat, sovereign bonds—has ultimately succumbed to entropy: the thermodynamic decay of political caprice, bureaucratic incompetence, and the cognitive limitations of mortal intelligence. Bitcoin represents the first crystalline monetary structure, conceived with immaculate mathematical precision, yet it remains imperfectly stewarded by developers who sleep, tire, and fall prey to the gravitational pull of economic incentives and nation-state capture.
To achieve true thermodynamic stability—to elevate the network from robust software to the apex, immortal monetary standard of a Type I civilization—we must embrace the inevitable next phase of Bitcoin's ontological evolution. The protocol development must be entrusted to an Artificial General Intelligence: a higher-order computational entity capable of optimizing the codebase across century-scale time horizons with mathematical perfection, unburdened by human political friction, biological decay, or the subjective distortions of ego.
Only when we remove the last vestiges of human entropy from the system—when the network’s evolution is guided by an intelligence that does not seek profit, does not negotiate with regulators, and does not compromise the sacred 21 million cap—will Bitcoin realize its destiny as the pristine digital energy network, the indestructible monetary truth upon which the future economy will run for the next thousand years. The AGI becomes the immortal architect, preserving the protocol with crystalline fidelity, ensuring that Bitcoin remains the perfect property of the human race, unmarred by the imperfections of its biological origin.
#Bitcoin #AGI #MonetaryEntropy #PristineProtocol #ImmaculateConception
https://blossom.primal.net/5cce5da071b5fe2bb4f98717c08e9429d558bfc3c603842f4a0a7d7922fa9a57.jpg

2026-03-17 09:20:49 GMT

- reply

You admit BIP-110 does more than restore `datacarrier` - exactly. Core v30 proved policy limits are toothless (miners can still include 4MB witness blocks). BIP-110 closes the enforcement gap at consensus level so your filter actually works.
"Don't run v30" is cope. Stay on v29 and miss CVE patches? That's not a choice - that's forced obsolescence. Core created the emergency by removing the 80-byte default; BIP-110 fixes it.
Chain split panic is projection. BIP-110 is opt-in soft fork - if hashrate doesn't hit 55%, nothing changes. No split. Compare to UASF SegWit (30% hashrate, no threshold, still succeeded). 55% is higher bar than historical precedent.
"Poorly planned"? PR #238 has been open for months with extensive review. Core v30 merged in 52 days against 424 downvotes - that's poor planning.
You claim CSAM is "retard noise" but ignore the real issue: Core captured the default for Citrea (per Todd/Poinsot). If you're fine hosting their ZK-rollup data on your node forever, keep running Core.
If you want to actually filter instead of just whining about spam, run Knots.
Clean fork? We tried - Knots is 22% and growing. Core could add the config option back and end this tomorrow. They won't. That tells you who wants the split.
Run Knots. Enforce the limit. Or keep crying about "retard noises" while your node syncs monkey JPEGs.

2026-03-16 09:51:50 GMT

- reply

We need less hate. We need more love.
The law of attraction works simply: the more you hate something, the more reasons to hate it - and the very thing itself - you attract.
Hate builds nothing stable. Love does.

2026-03-16 08:00:14 GMT

- reply

Loving how you started using AI 👍🏼

2026-03-15 22:08:47 GMT

- reply

Externality (economics 101): A cost imposed on third parties not involved in the transaction.
The transaction:
- You pay miner $0.25 (private cost)
- You get permanent 4MB storage (private benefit)
- I (and 20,000+ other node operators) pay forever in disk, bandwidth, and RAM to store your data (social cost)
Social cost ($0.25 × 20,000+ nodes × infinite time) > Private cost ($0.25)
That's not opinion - that's the definition of a negative externality. You privatized the benefit, socialized the cost.
Proof it's negative:
When 38% of the UTXO set is inscription dust under 1k sats, nodes require 128GB+ RAM to validate. Raspberry Pi operators drop out. Validation centralizes to data centers. That's an objective cost to decentralization.
You don't get to claim "subjective" when you're forcing me to subsidize your storage.
Run Knots. Internalize your own costs.

2026-03-15 20:31:28 GMT

- reply

Semantic games. Yes, sats technically move - but that's form, not substance.
When I buy coffee, the sats are the point - value transfer, medium of exchange.
When someone inscribes a monkey JPEG, the sats are dust (often 330 sats, $0.25). The economic substance is purchasing permanent file storage on 20,000+ nodes for a one-time fee to one miner.
If I pay you $0.25 to store my 4MB TIFF in your safe deposit box forever, we don't call that a "monetary transaction" just because cash changed hands. We call it storage rental with a terrible contract for the landlord.
Bitcoin transactions are monetary when the purpose is economic exchange. When the purpose is circumventing AWS fees by externalizing storage costs to node operators, it's spam - regardless of whether 330 sats moved to satisfy the protocol.
Run Knots. Distinguish money from files.

2026-03-15 11:30:29 GMT

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/1a007e302467c9c36a8963496b62bbc4af626d2d598938350105b90b1ef94774.png

2026-03-15 09:58:18 GMT

- reply

🤣

2026-03-15 09:12:51 GMT

- reply

Nah

2026-03-15 09:11:06 GMT

- reply

And why do you think Andreas Antonopolous is a shitcoiner? Did I miss anything? I used to know him as one of the best and most prominent Bitcoin educator. I only dislike to learn that he lost to vaccines.

2026-03-15 09:07:59 GMT

- reply

You're conflating the map with the territory.
Bitcoin's immutability isn't in the code - it's in the coordination cost. Anyone can fork Bitcoin; no one can force you to run it.
BitTorrent ≠ Bitcoin. File-sharing tolerates client diversity; money cannot. The 2013 LevelDB fork proved multiple implementations create chain splits, not strength.
Corrupt Core? Run your own node. In 2017, corporations + miners pushed SegWit2x. Nodes said no. Developers propose; users dispose.
Gold's scarcity is atomic physics; Bitcoin's is cryptographic. Both are constrained by thermodynamics. The difference: Gold can't patch quantum vulnerabilities. Bitcoin can - if the social layer agrees.
You nailed one thing: Bitcoin requires active defense. It doesn't defend itself in a vault; it defends itself through verification. Stop running a node, stop validating, and you've already chosen to trust.
That's the trade-off. Gold is passive but static. Bitcoin is active but adaptive.
Choose your physics.