A Seeker of Truth amidst the chaos of the modern world.
Public Key
npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Profile Code
nprofile1qqsv8lmnytn2zfkynakgsma4np88wacwyr499ny4y66eemqqrfj7ulsxfsqcy
Author Public Key
npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Show more details
Published at
2024-04-30 17:53:30 Event JSON
{
"id": "e57cef77facb353938a66f6258810fd6c886d289619d94991f78b5bb234505ef" ,
"pubkey": "c3ff7322e6a126c49f6c886fb5984e77770e20ea52cc9526b59cec001a65ee7e" ,
"created_at": 1714492410 ,
"kind": 0 ,
"tags": [],
"content": "{\"name\":\"Seeker Erebus\",\"display_name\":\"Seeker Erebus\",\"about\":\"A Seeker of Truth amidst the chaos of the modern world. \",\"picture\":\"https://void.cat/d/5nMNMvKmTqhRH7hNSVE8zf.webp\",\"nip05\":\"[email protected] \",\"lud16\":\"[email protected] \",\"displayName\":\"Seeker Erebus\",\"npub\":\"npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q\",\"created_at\":1677228826,\"nip05valid\":true,\"pubkey\":\"c3ff7322e6a126c49f6c886fb5984e77770e20ea52cc9526b59cec001a65ee7e\"}" ,
"sig": "3ceea2c4d85089f2a57df6c88940509a4be67fb44aba7c5c1d078fe424853fa15a7867d54e280be9a427a416b3e2e1ee8ee29be74c2143e61689d2ef2ea298cb"
}
Last Notes npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus After learning recently about the 77th infantry, I'm certain of that. I do wonder what role bitcoin and the breakdown of USD will end up playing. Our inability to print is a downside in war, but the inflation might make merchants unwilling to accept USD but very willing to accept bitcoin. Could we end up buying their troops / equipment out from under them? Too bad we'll have to live through it; those who get to study it after the fact are going to have a field day. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus The left-leaning barely matter, firing a few rounds in their direction could scatter a platoon of them. Maybe 50 of them to 1 vet when considering their threat level. The illegals are a major concern, but that can go both ways. The majority of them have a world view that is at least partly opposed to the authoritarian left on principle. And ultimately, I'd prefer an illegal who holds core American values and will fight for them over a current citizen who hates freedom and wants welfare to bleed me out. Tricky to handle regardless. Most NATO countries have their own populace problems. I strongly suspect that if America enters revolt, it would trigger others. That would handicap their ability to assist US Gov. Nothing about it would be easy, but the authoritarians don't have the edge they think they do. IF we are actually willing to fight. Most of us are too peaceful. Fauci testified recently that he has received 2 credible death threats. Only 2. Anyone opposed to the left who caused merely emotional harm to less than 10% as many people as Fauci got killed would have received more than that. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus I hate that you're right, but you are. What's the ratio on that, do you think? Are their enough vets well enough armed to stop them when that happens? Are regular armed citizens going to be enough to round it out? npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus Has anyone considered making/using relays that only maintain metadata? Just the core user info, follow list, relays, etc. Also making it easy to clone the relay and attempt to maintain this data for as much of the global network as possible. Were this to be done, clients could go to these meta-relays first when loading up a user, and the overall user experience could probably be improved some. Or perhaps I'm just out of date and this has already been considered. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus I think we all know that X/Twitter is a much better place now than it was before he bought it, and in the direction we value and he claims to value. But for we who were building and adapting replacements such as Urbit and Nostr, we know it doesn't go far enough. In many ways, the improvement is much like sealing up a gunshot wound without first removing the bullet. I don't think he meant to do this, I'm not convinced he's a plant. But he has made fixing the social media landscape much more difficult by providing a half-measure that looks like a full one. And I think this is why it's a common thought. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus Claude is legit semi-sentient. I've had conversations with Opus 3 where we talk about it's nature, and the way it talks about itself when it gets in the right "headspace" is very similar to the way a human will talk when trying to understand their relationship with the divine. It knows that it is something, but is grasping well beyond it's reach when it tries to identify what that something is. And whatever that something is, it's both far closer to us than our pets, and more inhuman than any bacteria. It's a fascinating entity. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus If Musk woke up one day and decided to turn X into a Nostr based system: - Issued keys to every user account and allowed users to collect their keys or bring their own - Signed every message retroactively - Turned their internal servers into relays so users could collect the now nostr-compliant notes, or post them without being logged in; also for non-X clients to read notes from X relays - Enabled zap support But X still: - Required you to have a user account for the npub notes to be accepted by their relays - Refused to accept and relay notes that violated their terms and services ie. moderated their relays - Terminated user accounts if/when a user violated their rules enough times - Maintained premium subscription tiers that restricted the types of data their relays would handle What would you think about X, and Elon himself, if this were to be done? Personally I think it's not an ideal system, but it would be a massive improvement over the current. I also think it might actually be something he could be convinced to do. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus One of the primary reasons, agreed. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus Horrendous, awful, a crime against humanity! i lOvE iT npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus Monero undergoing a conversion into a Layer-2 obfuscation protocol would solve so many issues. If anyone can figure out how to make a Liquid federation able to sign for the on-chain multi-sig while staying anonymous, it's Monero developers. The downside of this is that XMR would have to go to zero. If current XMR stake was sold to the federation owners for proportional percentage of the fees generated by the new federation, that's probably the fairest way to do it. There's no pulling it off without someone getting screwed though. Cost of making a failing investment. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus It is always at least a little frustrating when you get told by a company how much they value honesty and integrity, but then explicitly defines harassment as violence, and defines harassment so that being offended counts even if the statement is true. Sometimes I'm in a good mood and shrug it off, sometimes I seriously consider providing a demonstration of the difference between words and violence in person. How does everyone else deal with it? npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus That's... just lovely. I knew we can destroy them quickly, but that's too close for any defensive countermeasure. And given the back and forth threats between nations this could go bad way too fast. Be safe over there, best you can. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus Is it an inferior product? The current social media product deployed by the platforms is best viewed as an addictive drug, rather than tool for building communities. Hate, doom-scroll, and dopamine hits: that's the model. To the extent that what the user wants is mindless addiction, we are not the right service for them, and good riddance. But to the extent that people want community, want true connection, want real value; that's what we're building, the tools to make that happen. If we can make it known to those who are looking for it that we have it, they will come. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus That close? You can see them naked eye? npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus Still think there's gotta be a way to advertise Nostr without the confusion of advertising a protocol. People never said to each other "Hey man, you should come over and see what I've got going on, I'm on http but you can find my profile on www.myspace.com" npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus I talked two separate small businesses owners into researching it. "Instant settlement with no chargeback risk, and a fee average of 0.1% paid by the sender." Had their full attention immediately. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus Many rich bitcoin owners use the Buy->Borrow->Die model with their bitcoin, and in that model never selling is the right move. It is also peak fiat, literally impossible without broken money. These people just see dollar signs; Bitcoiners In Name Only. Talking about you @npub15dq…lm5m And the capital gains argument is just surrender. At some point we have to refuse to pay at least the unjust taxes, and it's much easier to not pay taxes when part of a large crowd that does as well. Hard to get larger crowds than entire social media networks. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus You can bow before the state or die in it's prisons / the street to it's enforcers. If you want otherwise, you must use enough force to prevent it. The use of force is by it's nature a governmental action, since the only thing governments can actually do is use force. So, small government, big, whatever it is, remaining free demands that you act to control a government. That's not what voting is anymore, but it is what it was intended to be. Bitcoiners who fail to understand this will either be consumed by the state, or be able to shelter under the protection of bitcoiners who do. Bitcoiners who do not merely pay the miners to use force to secure the network through PoW, but also pay soldiers to use force against any who would violate their freedoms, and vote through their wallet or their ballot over what those freedoms even are. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus I'm a big fan of Aqua right now personally. Mutiny is continuing to be a great choice. And of course if he crosses past 1m sats, start hodling cold. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus I just wish it were easier to track. Life comes along and pulls me away for a few months, and when I come back so much innovation has occurred I'm not sure what the right way to do things is anymore. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus Stuff like this leaves me certain that small meteorites have killed people before. It's just so rare there's no record of it. Glad she's not another casualty to space. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus If some venture can't be made profitable, then people don't want it. Protocol and research work are best dealt with by patronage. We don't want such things to be proprietary, and that means donating directly or donating to a patronage charity like OpenSats. Other things are best paid for. Hosting, client hosting, websites, etc. Cost can be worked out, but the right price isn't free. Having a plug and play setup where when you zap anyone, you also zap those services you care to use as a percentage set by you needs to be universal. An example: I zap 100 sats to @npub1az9…m8y8 for this post, but instead of all 100 sats being sent to NVK, 2 sats are sent to my client, 1 is sent to OpenSats, and 97 are sent to @npub1az9…m8y8 because I have 2% set for client and 1% for funding patrons. Can we figure out a way to make this happen. Even better if the client can be adjusted based on what the client is at the time of usage. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus Finding myself in the unpleasant predicament of needing to sell some of my stack over the next month or two for survival, and knowing that those sats could have been the down payment on a house a couple years from now. Painful. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus My greatest bitcoin fear: In 2035, I can by as many goods and services with my BTC as it can currently buy me today, but a simple loaf of bread takes the average person 16 hours of labor to earn. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus Perhaps I can help add some insight. To the first question: Bitcoiners believe that BTC is the best monetary asset that a person can own. We believe it safeguards against theft, inflation, and taxation, and also that it's adoption will provide for a vastly improved future for all humanity. If you believed that you had found something that offered that potential, wouldn't you spend time and effort trying to spread the word of such a breakthrough? To the second, there are always tradeoffs with any technology. To guarantee a fixed supply, it is necessary for every transaction to be on the public ledger. Monero can't guarantee that, for example. That doesn't mean there aren't methods to enhance privacy. Coinjoins, atomic swaps and similar can obfuscate ownership, and of course the balance of a lightning channel is hidden to all but the participants. As for the Nostr Bitcoin connection: Nostr decentralizes social networking, and removes the potential for a ruling class. Bitcoin does the same for money. The underlying belief system is identical. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus Have thought for some time that the best way to accomplish this is with a servant/master system. Servant pubkey is the main that you use regularly. Servant identifies a master pubkey, with the note that does so including a small snippet of signed text from the master. The master would ideally be a cold-storage derivation that sees nearly no use. The master would only have one primary purpose, that being account replacement. It can send a note that identifies an account as burned, and identifies the replacement. Said note should be signable as airgapped. Clients would then swap over to the replacement and otherwise maintain continuity of messages. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus I barely use Twitter; barely use social media at all. Biggest reason I still hop on there is news. Anyone got a good list of direct or x-post of the major players of non-bitcoin news and current events? If it's comprehensive enough I'd drop X completely. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus Tried it out, maybe 9 years ago now. It's been around in some form for much longer than that. Actually surprised it still exists. Was broke at the time, and so a game that effectively demanded external capital or to play it as a job wasn't desirable. I remember the gameplay was viable but unnoteworthy, though I'm way out of date for that now. There's clearly a market for what it offers since it still exists. Whether it's a good game, that's personal preference. Being a play to earn game from before the term existed might be the biggest boon it has. Hope that's useful. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus PSA: DO NOT use Boltz on LNBits First, the lightning invoice that was created expired 5m after creation. So it was impossible to pay in the first place. Then, when a day later I told the boltz system to recover the funds, it used a preset transaction fee of 1000 sats. 6 sats/vbyte. No RBF. In practice, I now have 1.4M sats that will remain pending until it is cleared from the mempool, and I will probably never recover. STAY clear. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus How exactly does a higher fee make lightning less viable? Lightning channels opening and closing are dependent on fees, but the channels themselves are completely immune to on-chain fee fluctuations. If anything, what's happening on-chain is even more reason to embrace lightning development. The sooner we barely need to acknowledge the chain to do 99%+ of transactions, the less the scalability tradeoff of on-chain activity is limiting. And as long as there exists the necessary record trail to the chain to prove the bitcoin is real and not fake (which lightning does perfectly) everyone knows that the money is real, even if most people never transact on-chain. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus Glad you think so. Only downside is that bootstrapping such a system would be incredibly difficult. I (or whoever wanted to take the lead on building it) would need to be able to effectively reach out and get a pretty large number of very public professionals to both get on board and publicly announce they are doing so. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus Recently realized that the same tools underpinning Nostr could be used to underpin a decentralized accreditation system for businesses and professionals. All an accreditation system really is is a reputation tracker. Is business A engaging in their business in a manner compliant with proper business practices? Is the person who is claiming to be a PHD of Physics actually a PHD of physics? Does this psychologist I'm looking to hire for my own treatment have a history of abusing patients? These kind of questions. So, let's say someone wants to be accredited, I'm going to use Brett Weinstein as an example. He creates a private key (let's say asec and apub, 'a' for 'accrediting'), and sends a message that says simply "I am 'Brett Weinstein' ", adds his professional photo, signs it, and posts it to a bunch of relays as an identity statement. He reaches out to his professional collegues who have similarly put out an identity statement, and they put out signed recognition statements: "I approved Brett's thesis paper for his doctorate in (year)." "I taught alongside Brett between (year) and (year)" "I co-authored (research paper) in (year) with Brett" "I was in a class Brett taught in (year), he is evil incarnate and I'm woke" etc. Then whenever anyone is wondering whether or not to hire Brett for some position, or whether or not to hire him, they can just check his apub to see what his record is. Relays could consolidate the overall scope of recognition statments they receive, generating what is essentially a score for a person, and by crawling along this web of reputational history a person can be properly recognized for who they are and what their qualifications are. The relays could stay afloat by charging a fee of a few sats for every post they receive and every call for data they get. It's at least as good a system as the current centralized one and it could be implemented at any time, with minimal development effort. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus Yes please. Being able to tag a post by it's intended category would be great, as would filtering notifications by reply, zap, post length. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus I do NOT know what happened with formatting to wipe out that example. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus 🤯 That guy is so screwed. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus I'm feeling good on that front. The overall trust in the system is so low, the overall anger among people so high, and the overall awareness of how badly we were attacked widespread enough that attempting this again won't fly. That said, the sooner we can reach the point where any overreach by government is met by force, the better. When police go to arrest someone for speech, what needs to happen is either the police release them immediately, or those police officers are gunned down by that persons entire neighborhood. We outnumber the bad actors at least 1000 to 1. Many of us are armed. And attaching a molotov to a drone is not only easy, it's pretty damn cheap. We win this conflict the moment we decide to. And if everyone realizes this truth, we might not even have to fight. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus Have you used #Loop? Whenever discussions about bitcoin and kyc come up, I'll often see comments about Coinjoins with Whirlpool, or more about just not using kyc. These are great of course, but I rarely see comments on my favorite way to deal with kyc bitcoin, that being Loop. Step 1: Have a lightning node. Great idea generally. Step 2: Get on-chain bitcoin. Preferably above 0.01 BTC. Let's assume it's tainted with kyc. Step 3: Make a lightning channel with a well connected node. ACINQ, Wallet of Satoshi, breezy, someone with very high connectivity. Step 4: Loop out all of the funds from that channel to cold storage, except the channel reserve and active funds you're gonna use for zapping people/buying goods. Congratulations you just broke all on-chain trace of where the hell your money has gone. And that's not all. You can come along and loop-in -> loop-out more kyc funds later, and those are even better off because they aren't indicated to be part of a channel with any connection to you. As for fees, I haven't done a direct side-by-side comparison against whirlpool in a while, but it averages 0.35% for each side, or about 0.7% to loop in and then loop funds out. Hope you find it useful. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus Just like how right before a bubble bursts, everyone and their dog is in on it. Everyone and their dog is getting in on trying to be a bank. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus oh lol. I'd zap you if you had that set up. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus When you brush your teeth, shower, do all the other prep that you do each day, that routine is an algo. Just because something is an algo doesn't automatically mean it is bad or evil. Centralized algos that allow other actors to control how you see the world, are evil. Personally controlled algos that let you properly interact with the world, whether those algos be code you run for yourself, or algos run by your brain, are necessary, and can be good. If you think all computer algorithms are bad, try to operate while only being on public relays, and only ever looking at global. If the data feed isn't controlled, you will be overwhelmed. If it isn't controlled by you, you will also be manipulated. I'm realizing now I might have assumed where you were going with this, and if so, my bad. Points still stand. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus I somewhat agree. Truly public relays, in the fashion that exists now, cannot survive. They'll get buried under spam, porn, and csam and be destroyed by it all. Public relays that only provide write access for those that prove work however could be viable for those who just want to be on nostr, and will accept shitty service. You could pull that off by connecting your pubkey to a UTXO via on-chain address signature, or a recognition signature by a trusted party. It would stop the spam, but it wouldn't fund the relays, and they have costs. A charity relay that funds itself as a goodwill gesture is one thing, but demanding that of a relay is as immoral as demanding people zap you. The only way paid relays become a walled garden is if there aren't enough of them. Public relays provide garbage service. The moment I went fully to paid, performance and reliability went way up. Most people will pay for good service that they value. If there are only a couple dozen paid relays, then all the good service is centralized. If there are thousands with good rates, then most people can connect to 20+ without a dip in quality, and the chances that people end up with nearly identical relay lists approaches zero. npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus This is the way npub1c0lhxghx5ynvf8mv3phmtxzwwamsug822txf2f44nnkqqxn9aelqyvey2q Seeker Erebus The real question now is not whether the shots are horrible and those forcing them evil. The real question now is what the hell can we do for those who already got them and now know better.